Advertisement

Cryocoolers 11 pp 281-289 | Cite as

Investigation of Helium and Nitrogen Mixtures in a Pulse Tube Refrigerator

  • Z. H. Can
  • G. B. Chen
  • G. Thummes
  • C. Heiden
Chapter
  • 1.2k Downloads

Abstract

Normally, the working fluid used in regenerative cryocoolers is not condensed at any point in the working cycle. Helium is the popular working medium for such systems, rather than a gas mixture because ofits excellent thermodynamic and transport properties. However, our theoretical analyses indicate that pure helium is not the best working fluid for regenerative refrigerators near 80 K, either for the best cooling power, or for the best coefficient of performance (COP).

Motivated by the advantages of pulse tube refrigerators, which have no moving parts in the cold end, this paper describes an experimental investigation on a two-component, multi-phase helium and nitrogen gas mixture in a single-stage pulse tube refrigerator. The experimental results show that the COP and the cooling power can be increased to some extent near 80 K with the use of two-component gas mixtures with less than 25% nitrogen. A relatively stable temperature platform at the triple point of nitrogen (63.15K), which is independent of the nitrogen fraction, is obtained when the cooling power is below 7W.

Keywords

Cooling Power Pulse Tube Pure Helium Refrigeration Temperature Nitrogen Fraction 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Ishizaki, Y., et al., “Experimental Performance of Modified Pulse Tube Refrigerator Below 80K. Down 23K,” 7th Intl. Cryocooler Conf. Proceeding, Part 1 (1993), p. 140.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Wang, C., Thummes, G., and Heiden, C., “A Two-stage Pulse Tube Cooler Operating Below 4K,” Cryogenics, vol.37 (1997), p. 159.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Chen, G.B., Qiu, L.M., Zheng, J.Y., Yan, P.D., Gan, Z.H., Bai, X., and Huang, Z.X., “Experimental Study on a Double-orifice Two-stage Pulse Tube Refrigerator,” Cryogenics, vol. 37 (1997), p. 271.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Xu, M.Y., De Waele, ATAM., and Ju, Y.L., “A Pulse Tube Refrigerator below 2K,” Cryogenics, vol. 39, (1999), p. 865.ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Walker, G., “Stirling-Cycle Cooling Engine with Two-Phases, Two-Components Working Fluid,” Cryogenics, vol. 8 (1974), p. 459.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Patwardhan K.P. and Bapat S.L., “Cyclic Simulation of Stirling Cycle Cryogenerator Using Two Component Two Phase Working Fluid Combinations,” Proceedings of ICCR’98, Hangzhou, International Academic Publishers (1998), p. 397.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Zhao L., Chen, G.B., and Yu, J.P., “The possibility use with Gas Mixtures in Pulse Tube Refrigeration”, Cryogenics Engineering, 5 (1996), p. 15.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    McDonald, P.C., “Self-regulating Temperature Control of a Gifford-McMahon Refrigerator for Potential Use with Neon in High-Tc Power Applications,” Superconductor Science & Technology, 11 (1998), p. 817.ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Chen, G.B., Gan, Z.H., Thummes, G., and Heiden, C., “Thermodynamic Performance Prediction of Pulse Tube Refrigeration with Mixture Fluids,” Cryogenics, to be published.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    De Waele ATAM., Xu, M.Y., and Ju, Y.L., “Nonideal-gas Effect in Regenerators,” Cryogenics, vol.39 (1999), p. 847.ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 2002

Authors and Affiliations

  • Z. H. Can
    • 1
  • G. B. Chen
    • 1
  • G. Thummes
    • 2
  • C. Heiden
    • 2
  1. 1.Cryogenics Lab.Zhejiang UniversityHangzhouP.R.China
  2. 2.Institute of Applied PhysicsUniversity of GiessenGermany

Personalised recommendations