Conclusion
The non coherent imaging technique does not aim at the same goal as the coherent synthesis. With the non coherent process, the overall resolution is not much increased with respect to the theoretical performance of the physical array. However, the image quality is definitively improved at a low computational expense, and without stringent requirements about the accuracy of the antennae trajectory and attitude.
The main interests for the non coherent synthesis are: 1) Reduction of the side lobe levels, together with a slight improvement of the resolution in azimuth; 2) Drastic reduction of the speckle effect so that objects whose size is close to the theoretical longitudinal resolution of the physical antennae can be detected; 3) Robustness of the image quality with respect to the trajectory and attitude artefacts; 4) Robustness of the image quality with respect to the vehicle speed as long as the redundancy factor remains larger than 5, which authorizes surveys at high coverage rate; 5) Improvement of bathymetric measurements through the redundancy factor. This effect will be shown in an other paper. We are looking now for an experiment carried from a vessel, in order to verify and to quantify the capabilities of this technique at larger ranges, i.e. in actual operational conditions.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
F.R. Castella, Application of one-dimensional holographic techniques to a mapping sonar system, Acoustical Holography, Vol. 3, 1970, pp. 247–271.
L.J. Cutrona, Comparison of sonar system performance achievable using synthetic aperture techniques with the performance achievable by more conventional means, J.A.S.A., Vol. 58, no 2, August 1975, pp. 336–348.
J. Chatillon, M.E. Zakharia, M.E. Bouhier, Self-focusing of synthetic aperture sonar: validation from sea data, Proc. 2nd European Conference on Underwater Acoustics, Lyngby, Denmark, July 1994, pp. 727–731.
V. Tonard, J. Chatillon, Acoustical imaging of extended targets by means of synthetic aperture sonar technique, Acustica, Acta Acoustica, Vol. 83, 1997, pp. 992–999.
D. Billon, F. Fohanno, Theoretical performance and experimental results for synthetic aperture sonar self-calibration, Oceans’98, Septembre 1998, Nice, France.
G. Kossoff, Progress in pulse echo techniques, Proc. 2nd World Congress Ultrasonics in Medicine, Rotterdam 1974, pp. 37–48.
M.P. Hayes, P.T. Gough, Broad band synthetic aperture sonar, IEEE Journal of Oceanic Engineering, Vol. 17, no 1, Janvier 1992.
G. Shippey, T. Nordkvist, Phased array acoustic imaging in ground coordinates, with extension to synthetic aperture processing, IEEE Proc. Radar Sonar Navigation, Vol. 143, no 3, Juin 1996.
B.L. Douglas, H. Lee, C.D. Loggins, A multiple receiver synthetic aperture active sonar imaging system, Oceans’92, Conf. Records MTS, IEEE, 1992, pp. 300–305.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2002 Kluwer Academic Publishers
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Alais, P., Cervenka, P., Challande, P., Lesec, V. (2002). Noncoherent Synthetic Aperture Imaging. In: Lee, H. (eds) Acoustical Imaging. Acoustical Imaging, vol 24. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/0-306-47108-6_1
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/0-306-47108-6_1
Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA
Print ISBN: 978-0-306-46518-5
Online ISBN: 978-0-306-47108-7
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive