This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Executive Office of the President, Officeof Science and Technology Policy, Climate Change: State of Knowledge (October 1997) This document summarizes conclusions of the 1995 report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, the most comprehensive and thoroughly reviewed assessment of climate change science ever produced, representing the work of more than 2,000 of the world’s leading climate scientists.
Mobil Corporation, Climate: Technology and Carbon Dioxide Emissions: A Global Review and Assessment, (1999)
Nakicenovic, et al Global Energy Perspectives, IEA (1998)
Institute for Energy and Environmental Research, Science for Democratic Action (July 1999). Statement in masthead of publication, page 2.
Bastin, Clinton, letter to Naresh Chandra, India’s Ambassador to the United States (June 12, 1998) Copies of that letter and replies from Ambassador Chandra and the US National Security Council can be obtained from the author.
USAEC Division of Civilian Application Summary Report: AEC Reference Fuel-Processing Plant, WASH-743 (October 1957)
ibid, page 1
AEC official accountability records of enriched uranium shipped from ICPP, reviewed by the author in 1973.
Low, Lawrence D., Director, Division of Compliance, US Atomic Energy Commission, letter to R N. Miller, President, Nuclear Fuel services, Incorporated (March 16, 1972)
Reed, C. E., Senior Vice President-Corporate Studies and Programs, et al, General Electric Company Midwest Fuel Recovery Plant Technical Study Report (July 5, 1974)
Hewlett, Richard G, and Anderson, Oscar E., Jr., The New World-1939/1946 (Volume I of a History of the United States Atomic Energy Commission), page 91.
Hewlett, Richard G, and Anderson, Oscar E., Jr., The New World-1939/1946 (Volume I of a History of the United States Atomic Energy Commission) and Rhodes, Richard, The Making of the Atomic Bomb.
Jolley, Robert L, Genung, Richard K., McNeese, LE. (Gene), and Mrochek, John E., The ORNL Chemical Technology Division: 1950–1994, page 1–23.
Etter, DeLores M. (Deputy Under Secretary of Defense, Science and Technology), letter to Clinton Bastin, (June 22, 1999)
Same as reference 4.
DuPont Company Report to the Department of Energy “Response to Environmental Policy Institute Report on Savannah River Plant High-Level Waste Management,” DPSP-86-1164, (December 31, 1986)
Bastin, Clinton, Letter to Editor, Technology Review (April 1989) This letter included information from the DuPont Company report (Reference 13). A “response from the authors” was also published. Note that the authors misquoted from the letter in order to refute the claims of misinformation.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2002 Kluwer Academic Publishers
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Bastin, C. (2002). Nuclear Technology: Need for New Vision. In: Kursunoglu, B.N., Mintz, S.L., Perlmutter, A. (eds) The Challenges to Nuclear Power in the Twenty-First Century. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/0-306-47105-1_4
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/0-306-47105-1_4
Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA
Print ISBN: 978-0-306-46491-1
Online ISBN: 978-0-306-47105-6
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive