Advertisement

An Approach for Traffic Management Over G.983 ATM-based Passive Optical Networks

  • Maurice Gagnaire
  • Sašo Stojanovski
Part of the The International Series in Engineering and Computer Science book series (SECS, volume 557)

Abstract

A new generation of access networks is necessary for the provision of broadband services. ATM Passive Optical Networks (APON) are considered as a promising alternative among other numerous technologies based either on copper pairs, coaxial cables or wireless infrastructures. An APON is a point-to-multipoint broadcast system in the downstream direction and a multipoint-to-point shared medium in the upstream direction. A Medium Access Control (MAC) protocol has to be used for the upstream traffic in order to arbitrate concurrent access. The aim of this paper is first to describe the APON system architecture and the physical layer frame format as standardized by ITU-T in the G.983 recommendation. We then propose a possible approach for traffic management over such systems considering three aspects: MAC protocols, service disciplines and buffer management. Two types of traffic are considered, stream and elastic. Stream traffic refers to flows generated by real-time applications such as voice or video, whereas elastic traffic refers to TCP/IP flows. In the last part of our paper, we evaluate the performance of this approach by means of computer simulations.

Keywords

ATM GFR MAC protocols service disciplines buffer management 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. [1]
    J. Angelopoulos and E. Fragoulopoulos and I. Van de Voorde and I. Venieris and P. Vetter, “Efficient Control of ATM Traffic Accessing Broadband Core Networks via SuperPONs”, SPIE Journal, Vol.2357, 34–43, 1996.Google Scholar
  2. [2]
    L. Georgiadis and R. Guérin and K. N. Sivarajan Lacey, “Efficient Network QoS Provisioning Based on per Node Traffic Shaping”, IEEE/ACM Transactions on Networking, Vol.4, No.4, 1996.Google Scholar
  3. [3]
    Abhay K. Parekh and Robert G. Gallager, “A Generalized Processor Sharing Approach to Flow Control in Integrated Services Networks: The Single Node Case”, IEEE/ACM Transactions on Networking, Vol.1, No.3, 1993.Google Scholar
  4. [4]
    Juha Heinanen and Kalevi Kilkki, “A Fair buffer allocation scheme”, unpublished manuscript, 1995.Google Scholar
  5. [5]
    J. C. R. Bennet and H. Zhang, “Hierarchical Packet Fair Queueing Algorithms”, IEEE/ACM Transactions on Networking, Vol.5, No.5, 1997.Google Scholar
  6. [6]
    J. Roberts and U. Mocci and J. Virtamo, “Broadband Network Teletraffic”, Final Report of Action, COST 242, Springer Verlag, 1996.Google Scholar
  7. [7]
    M. Mathis and J. Mahdavi and S. Floyd and A. Romanow, “TCP Selective Acknowledgement Options”, IETF RFC 2018, April 2018.Google Scholar
  8. [8]
    Tom Henderson and Sally Floyd, “The NewReno Modification to TCP’s Fast Recovery Algorithm”, IETF draft-ietf-tcpimpl-newreno, November 1998.Google Scholar
  9. [9]
    B. Suter and T. V. Lakshman and D. Stiliadis and A. Choudhury, “Efficient Active Queue Management for Internet Routers”, Proceedings of the Networld+Interop Engineers Conference, May 1998.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 2002

Authors and Affiliations

  • Maurice Gagnaire
    • 1
  • Sašo Stojanovski
    • 1
  1. 1.ENST InfResParisFrance

Personalised recommendations