Skip to main content

Adaptive, Nonlinear, and Learning Techniques for the Control of Vehicle Ride Dynamics

  • Conference paper
Mechanics for a New Mellennium
  • 1011 Accesses

Abstract

The ride dynamics of road vehicles is concerned with the control of whole-body vibration, to provide comfort and vibration isolation for occupants and transported goods. Ride isolation from road unevenness is conventionally achieved through the pneumatic tire, coupled with a spring and damper in the suspension; however substantial benefits can be derived from active computer control of the suspension system. Active ride control also benefits from on-line adaptation, and similar advantage can be derived via nonlinear feedback control. This paper reviews the fundamental issues and considers the potential for future vehicles, against a background of increasing total system complexity and interaction, as well as the continuing need for robust, safe, and fault-tolerant operation. Consideration is also given to the use of “intelligent” control systems that adapt and learn in real-time on the vehicle.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Best, M. C. 1995. On the modelling requirements for the practical implementation of advanced vehicle suspension control, Ph.D. Thesis, Loughborough University.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Thompson, A. G. 1970. Design of active suspensions. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers (Part I) 185, 553–563.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Thompson, A. G. 1976. Active suspensions with optimal linear state feedback. Vehicle System Dynamics 5, 187–203.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Hac, A. 1992. Optimal linear preview control of active vehicle suspension. Vehicle System Dynamics 21, 167–195.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Yamashita, M., K. Fujimori, C. Uhlik, R. Kawatani, and H. Kimura. 1990. H control of an automotive active suspension. Proceedings of the 29th Conference on Decision and Control, 2244–2250.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Hedrik, J. K., and T. Butsuen. 1988. Invariant properties of automotive suspensions. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers International Conference on Advanced Suspensions, London.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Margolis, D. L. 1982. Semi-active heave and pitch control for ground vehicles. Vehicle System Dynamics 11, 31–42.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Fairgrieve, A., and T. J. Gordon. 2000. On-line estimation of local road gradient for improved steady-state suspension deflection control. Vehicle System Dynamics 33 (Supplement—Dynamics of Vehicles on Roads and Tracks), 590–603.

    Google Scholar 

  9. ElBeheiry, E. M., and D. C. Karnopp. 1996. Optimal control of vehicle random vibration with constrained suspension deflection. Journal of Sound and Vibration 189, 547–564.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Gordon, T. J., C. Marsh, and Q. H. Wu. 1993. Stochastic optimal control of active vehicle suspensions using learning automata. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers—Part I (Journal of Systems and Control Engineering) 207, 143–152.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Marsh, C., T. J. Gordon, and Q. H. Wu. 1995. The application of learning automata to controllerdesign in slow-active automotive suspensions. Vehicle System Dynamics 24, 597–616.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Frost, G. P., T. J. Gordon, M. N. Howell, and Q. H. Wu. 1996. Moderated reinforcement learning of active and semi-active vehicle suspension control laws. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers—Part I (Journal of Systems and Control Engineering) 210, 249–257.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Howell, M. N., G. P. Frost, T. J. Gordon, and Q. H. Wu. 1997. Continuous action reinforcement learning applied to vehicle suspension control. Mechatronics 7, 263–276.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Ono, E., S. Hosoe, H. D. Tuan, and Y. Hayashi. 1996. Nonlinear H control of active suspension. Vehicle System Dynamics 25 (Supplement—Dynamics of Vehicles on Roads and Tracks), 489–401.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Gordon, T. J., and R. S. Sharp. 1998. On improving the performance of automotive semi-active suspension systems through road preview. Journal of Sound and Vibration 217, 163–182.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Gordon, T. J., C. Marsh, and M. G. Milsted. 1991. A comparison of adaptive LQG and nonlinear controllers for vehicle suspension systems. Vehicle System Dynamics 20, 321–340.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Gordon, T. J., and M. C. Best. 1994. Dynamic optimization of nonlinear semiactive suspension controllers. Proceedings of the Institution of Electrical Engineers (IEE) 1994 International Conference “Control 94” (IEE Publication no. 389), Warwick, U.K., 332–337.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Sharp, R. S., and D. A. Wilson. 1990. On control laws for vehicle suspensions accounting for input correlations. Vehicle System Dynamics 19, 353–363.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Louam, N., D. A. Wilson, and R. S. Sharp. Optimization and performance enhancement of active suspensions for automobiles under preview of the road. Vehicle System Dynamics 21, 39–63.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Gordon, T. J. 1995. An integrated strategy for the control of complex mechanical systems based on sub-system optimality criteria. Proceedings of the IUTAM Symposium on Optimization of Mechanical Systems (Stuttgart, 1995) (D. Bestle and W. Schiehlen, eds.). Dordrecht: Kluwer, 97–104.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Gordon, T. J. 1996. An integrated strategy for the control of a full vehicle active suspension system. Vehicle System Dynamics 25 (Supplement—Dynamics of Vehicles on Roads and Tracks), 229–242.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Frost, G. P., M. N. Howell, T. J. Gordon, and Q. H. Wu. 1996. Dynamic vehicle roll control using reinforcement learning. Proceedings of the 1996 United Kingdom Automatic Control Council International Conference on CONTROL 96 (Exeter, U.K.), 1107–1118.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2001 Kluwer Academic Publishers

About this paper

Cite this paper

Gordon, T.J. (2001). Adaptive, Nonlinear, and Learning Techniques for the Control of Vehicle Ride Dynamics. In: Aref, H., Phillips, J.W. (eds) Mechanics for a New Mellennium. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/0-306-46956-1_20

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/0-306-46956-1_20

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-0-7923-7156-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-0-306-46956-5

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics