Skip to main content

Transport of Trichloroethylene (TCE) in Natural Soil by Electroosmosis

  • Chapter
Physicochemical Groundwater Remediation

Abstract

Contamination in low permeability soils poses a significant technical challenge to in situ remediation, primarily due to low mobilization of the contaminants and difficulty in uniform delivery of treatment reagents. An alternative approach using electroosmosis (EO) is used to mobilize Trichloroethylene (TCE) in soil. However, the EO approach causes significant chemical changes in the soil which may affect transport and/or chemical transformation of TCE. Laboratory experiments and mathematical modeling were used to characterize the transport and chemical transformation of TCE in undisturbed soil cores during EO. A contamination zone (CZ) were located 1 cm below the anode. Electroosmotic fluid flow was vertically downwards from anode to cathode. A voltage gradient of 1.4 V/cm was applied to the soil for 4 weeks. More than 95% of the TCE was mobilized toward the cathode in the soil over a period of 672 hrs. The advective velocity of TCE was approximately 1.3×10−5 cm/sec and the dispersion coefficient is two times the diffusion coefficient of 6.9×10−6 cm2/sec We observed dichloroethylene (cis-1,2-DCE) indicating dechlorination of TCE. Dechlorination occurred in parts of the soil column where reducing conditions (Eh-pH conditions) are dominant. The most significant reductive dechlorination of TCE occurred near the cathode, a source of electrons during electroosmosis. Results show the need to include a decay term in the transport equations. The results show that potential chemical transformation of chlorinated organic compounds could enhance the remediation efficiency during EO.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Bibliography

  • Acar, Y. B., Alshawabkeh, A. N., and Gale, R. J., (1992). “A review of fundamentals of removing contaminants from soils by electrokinetic soil processing.” Proceedings of the Mediterranean Conference on Environmental Geotechnology, May 25–27, 1992, Cesme, Turkey, Balkema Publishers, Inc., Amsterdam, Holland.

    Google Scholar 

  • Acar, Y. B., Gale, R. J., Alshawabkeh, A. N., Marks, R. E., Puppala, S., Bricka, M., and Parker, R., (1995). “Electrokinetic remediation: Basics and technology status.” Journal of Hazardous Materials, 40, 117–137.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Bruell, C. J., Segall, B. A., and Walsh, M. T. (1992). “Electroosmotic removal of gasoline hydrocarbons and TCE from clay.” Journal of Environmental Engineering, 118(1), 68–83.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Chen, J.-L., Al-Abed, S. R., Bryndzia, L. T., and Murdoch, L. C. (1999) “Cation Transport and Patitioning During a Field Test of Electroosmosis.” Water Resources Research, 35(12), 3841–3851.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Eyklot, G. R., and Daniel D. E. (1994). “Impact of System Chemistry on Electroosmosis in Contaminated Soil.” J. Geotech. Eng., 120(5), 797–815.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fetter, C. W. (1993). Contaminant Hydrogeology. Macmillan Pub., New York, NY, 458 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fischer, H. B., List, E. J., Koh, R. C. Y., Imberger, J., and Brooks, N. H. (1979). Mixing in Inland and Coastal Waters. Academic Press, New York, NY, 483pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fusillo, T. V., Hochreiter, J. J., Jr., and Lord, D. G. (1985). “Distribution of Volatile Organic Compounds in a New Jersey Costal Plain Aquifer System.” Groundwater, 23, 354–360.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hamed, J., Acar, Y. B., and Gale R. J. (1991) “Pb(II) Removal from Kaolinite by Electrokinetics.” J. Geotech. Eng. 117, 241–271.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ho, S. V., Sheridan, W, Athmer, C. J., Heitkamp, M. A., Brackin, J. M., Weber, D., and Brodsky, P. H. (1995). “Integrated In Situ Soil Remediation Technology: The Lasagna Process.” Environmental Science and Technology. 29, 2528–2534.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ho, S. V., Athmer, C. J., Sheridan, W, Sheridan P. W., Orth, R., Macenzie D., Brodsky, P. H., Shapiro A., Thornton R., Salvo J., Schultz D., Landis R., Griffith R., and Shoemaker S. (1999). “The Lasagna Technology for In situ Soil Remediation. 1. Small Field Test.” Environmental Science and Technology. 29, 2528–2534.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jackson, M. L. Soil Chemical Analysis, Prentice Hall, Inc., Englewood Cliffs, N.J., 1958.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mercer, J. W., Sipp, D. C., and Giffm, D. (1990). “U.S. Environ. Protect. Agency Report”EPA/600/8-90/003.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pamukcu, S., and Wittle, J. K., (1992). “Electrokinetic removal of selected heavy metals from soil.” Environmental Progress, 11(3), 241–250.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Probstein, R. F., and Hicks, R. E., (1993). “Removal of contaminants from soil by electric fields.” Science, 260, 498–503.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Runnells, D., and J. L. Larson. (1986). “A Laboratory Study of Electromigration as Possible Field Techniques for the Removal of Contaminants from Groundwater.” Ground Water Monitoring Review. 6(3), 85–88.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Segall, B. A., and Bruell, C. J., (1992). “Electoosmotic contaminant removal processes.” Journal of Environmental Engineering, 118(1), 84–100.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Shapiro, A. P., Renaud, P. C., and Probstein, R. F. (1989). “Preliminary studies on the removal of chemical species from saturated porous media by electroosmosis.” PhysicoChemical Hydrodynamics, 11(5/6), 785–802.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Shapiro, A. P., and Probstein, R. F. (1993). “Removal of contaminants from saturated clay by electroosmosis.” Environmental Science and Technology, 27, 283–291.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • USEPA, (1992). “A Technology Assessment of Soil Vapor Extraction and Air Sparging.” EPA/600/R-92/173.

    Google Scholar 

  • USEPA, (1990). “Ground Water Volume I: Groundwater and Contamination.” EPA/625/6-90/016a.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Genuchten, M. Th., and Parker, T. C. (1984). “Boundary Conditions for Displacement Experiments through Short Laboratory Soil Columns.” Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J., 48, 703–708.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2002 Kluwer Academic Publishers

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Al-Abed, S.R., Chen, JL. (2002). Transport of Trichloroethylene (TCE) in Natural Soil by Electroosmosis. In: Smith, J.A., Burns, S.E. (eds) Physicochemical Groundwater Remediation. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/0-306-46928-6_5

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/0-306-46928-6_5

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA

  • Print ISBN: 978-0-306-46569-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-0-306-46928-2

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics