Summary
The development of similarity methods for fast flexible ligand superposition has recently received considerable attention. These efforts have brought similarity methods to a level of performance comparable to the well established protein-ligand docking methods for binding mode assessment and molecular database screening. However, the strengths and intrinsic limitations of both methodologies have been also stressed out extensively. As the number of resolved ligand-bound protein structures increases, combining ligand-based and receptor-based approaches emerges as a consensus strategy to maximally exploit the structural information available and improve the results obtained with either of the methods alone.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Walters, P.A., Stahl, M.T. and Murcko, M.A., Drug Discov. Today, 3 (1998) 160.
Armstrong, R.W., Combs, A.P., Tempest, P.A., Brown, S.D. and Keating, T.A., Acc. Chem. Res., 29 (1996) 123.
Koltermann, A., Kettling, U., Bieschke, J., Winkler, T. and Eigen, M., Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 95 (1998) 1421.
VanDrie, J.H. and Lajiness, M.S., Drug Discov. Today, 3 (1998) 274.
Kubinyi, H., Curr. Opin. Drug Discov. Develop., 1 (1998) 16.
Ghose, A.K., Viswanadhan, V.N. and Wendoloski, J.J., In Parrill, A. and Reddy, M.R. (Eds.) Rational Drug Design, American Chemical Society, Washington, DC, 1998.
Clark, D.E., Drug Discov. Today, 5 (2000) 49.
Martin, J.L., Curr. Med. Chem., 3 (1996) 419.
Kuntz, I.D., Science, 257 (1992) 1078.
Böhm, H.-J., Curr. Opin. Biotechnol., 7 (1996) 433.
Kuntz, I.D., Blaney, J.M., Oatley, S.J., Langridge, R.L. and Femn, T.E., J. Mol. Biol., 161 (1982) 269.
Rarey, M., Kramer, B., Lengauer, T. and Klebe, G., J. Mol. Biol., 261 (1996) 470.
Welch, W., Ruppert, J. and Jain, A.N., Chem. Biol., 3 (1996) 449.
Jones, G., Willett, P., Glen, R.C., Leach, A.R. and Taylor, R., J. Mol. Biol., 267 (1997) 727.
Moms, G.M., Goodsell, D.S., Halliday, R.S., Huey, R., Hart, W.E., Belew, R.K. and Olson, A.J., J. Comput. Chem., 19 (1998) 1639.
Sun, Y., Ewing, T.J., Skillman, A.G. and Kuntz, I.D., J. Comput.-Aided Mol. Design, 12 (1998) 597.
Baxter, C.A., Murray, C.W., Clark, D.E., Westhead, D.R. and Eldridge, M.D. Proteins, 33 (1998) 367.
Wang, J., Kollman, P.A. and Kuntz, I.D., Proteins, 36 (1999) 1.
Trosset, J.Y. and Scheraga, H.A., J. Comput. Chem., 20 (1999) 412.
Fradera, X., Knegtel, R.M.A. and Mestres, J., Proteins Struct. Funct. Genet., 40 (2000) 623.
Ewing, T. and Kuntz, I.D., J. Comput. Chem., 18 (1997) 1175.
Vieth, M., Hirst, J.D., Dominy, B.N., Daigler, H. and Brooks III, C.L., J. Comput. Chem., 19 (1998) 1623.
Bush, B.L. and McCammon, J.A., Biophys. J., 72 (1997) 1047.
Ajay, and Murcko, M.A., J. Med. Chem., 38 (1996) 4953.
Raffa, R.B., Life Sci., 65 (1999) 967.
Friesner, R.A. and Beachy, M.D., Curr. Opin. Struct. Biol., 8 (1998) 257.
Monard, G. and Merz Jr., K.M., Acc. Chem. Res., 32 (1999) 904.
Vieth, M., Hirst, J.D., Kolinski, A. and Brooks III, C.L., J. Comput. Chem., 19 (1998) 1612.
Tame, J.R.H., J. Comput.-Aided Mol. Design, 13 (1999) 99.
Knegtel, R.M.A., Bayada, D.M., Engh, R.A., von der Saal, W., van Geerestein, V.J. and Grootenhuis, P.D.J. J. Comput.-Aided Mol. Design, 13 (1999) 167.
Muegge, I. and Martin, Y.C., J. Med. Chem., 42 (1999) 791.
Gschwend, D.A. and Kuntz, I.D., J. Comput.-Aided Mol. Design, 10 (1996) 123.
Leach, A.R., J. Mol. Biol., 235 (1994) 345.
Knegtel, R.M.A., Kuntz, I.D. and Oshiro, C.M., J. Mol. Biol., 266 (1997) 424.
Apostolakis, J., Pluckthun, A. and Caflisch, A,, J. Comput. Chem., 19 (1998) 21.
Sandak, B., Wolfson, H.J. and Nussinov, R., Proteins, 32 (1998) 159.
Blaney, J.M. and Dixon, J.S., Perspect. Drug Discov. and Design, 1 (1993) 301.
Jones, G. and Willett, P., Curr. Opin. Biotech., 6 (1995) 652.
Lengauer, T. and Rarey, M., Curr. Opin. Struct. Biol., 6 (1996) 402.
Sansom, C., Nat. Biotechnol, 16 (1998) 917.
Kirkpatrick, D.L., Watson, S. and Ulhaq, S., Comb. Chem. High-Through. Screen., 2 (1999) 211.
Knegtel, R.M.A. and Wagener, M., Proteins Struct. Funct. Genet., 37 (1999) 334.
Johnson, M.A. and Maggiora, G.M. (Eds.), Concepts and Applications of Molecular Similarity, Wiley, New York, NY, 1990.
Dean, P.M. (Ed.), Molecular Similarity in Drug Design, Blackie Academic, London, 1995.
Karelson, M., Lobanov, V.S. and Katritzky, A.R., Chem. Rev., 96 (1996) 1027.
Hansch, C., Hoekman, D. and Gao, H., Chem. Rev., 96 (1996) 1045.
Cramer III, R.D., Patterson, D.E. and Bunce, J.D., J. Am. Chem. Soc., 110 (1988) 5959.
Klebe, G., Perspect. Drug Discov. Design, 12/13/14 (1998) 87.
Kubinyi, H. (Ed.), 3D QSAR in Drug Design: Theory, Methods and Applications, ESCOM, Leiden, 1993.
Kubinyi, H., Folkers, G. and Martin, Y.C. (Eds.), 3D QSAR in Drug Design: Ligand-protein Interactions and Molecular Similarity, Perspect. Drug Discov. Design, 9/10/11 (1998).
Kubinyi, H., Folkers, G. and Martin, Y.C. (Eds.), 3D QSAR in Drug Design: Recent Advances, Perspect. Drug Discov. Design, 12/13/14 (1998).
Willett, P., Similarity and Clustering in Chemical Information Systems, Wiley, New York, NY, 1994.
Martin, E.J., Blaney, J.M., Siani, M.A., Spellmeyer, D.C., Wong, A.K. and Moos, W.K., J. Med. Chem., 38 (1995) 1431.
Hassan, M., Bielawaski, J.P., Hempel, J.C. and Waldman, M., Mol. Div., 2 (1996) 64.
Bayada, D.M., Hamersma, H. and van Geerestein, V.J., J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci., 39 (1999) 1.
Martin, E.J. and Critchlow, R.E., J. Comb. Chem., 1 (1999) 32.
Agrafiotis, D.K., Myslik, J.C. and Salemme, F.R., Mol. Div., 4 (1999) 1.
Barnard, J.M. and Downs, G.M., J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci., 32 (1992) 644.
Brown, R.D. and Martin, Y.C., J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci., 37 (1997) 1.
Matter, H., J. Med. Chem., 40 (1997) 1219.
Flower, D.R., J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci., 38 (1998) 379.
Xue, J., Godden, J.W. and Bajorath, J., J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci., 39 (1999) 881.
Cramer, R.D., Redl, G. and Berkhoff, C.E., J. Med. Chem., 17 (1973) 533.
Hagadone, T.R., J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci., 32 (1992) 515.
Van Drie, J.H., J. Comput.-Aided Mol. Design, 11 (1997) 39.
Pickett, S.D., Luttmann, C., Guerin, V., Laoui, A. and James, E., J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci., 38 (1998) 144.
Chen, X., Rusinko III, A., Tropsha, A. and Young, S.S., J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci., 39 (1999) 887.
Kearsley, S.K. and Smith, G.M., Tetrahedron Comput. Methods, 3 (1990) 615.
Good, A.C., Hodgkin, E.E. and Richards, G.W., J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci., 32 (1992) 188.
Jain, A.N., Dietterich, T.G., Lathrop, R.H., Chapman, D., Critchlow Jr., R.E., Bauer, B.E., Webster, T.S. and Lozano-Perez, T., J. Comput.-Aided Mol. Design, 8 (1994) 635.
Klebe, G., Mietzner, T. and Weber, F, J. Comput.-Aided Mol. Design, 8 (1994) 751.
McMartin, C. and Bohacek, R.S., J. Comput.-Aided Mol. Design, 9 (1995) 237.
Perkins, T.D.J., Mills, J.E.J. and Dean, P.M., J. Comput.-Aided Mol. Design, 9 (1995) 479.
Jones, G., Willett, P. and Glen, R.C., J. Comput.-Aided Mol. Design, 9 (1995) 532.
Lemmen, C., Hiller, C. and Lengauer, T., J. Comput.-Aided Mol. Design, 12 (1998) 491.
Mestres, J., Rohrer, D.C. and Maggiora, G.M., J. Comput. Chem., 18 (1997) 934.
Lemmen, C., Lengauer, T. and Klebe, G., J. Med. Chem., 41 (1998) 4502.
Miller, M.D., Sheridan, R.P. and Kearsley, S.K., J. Med. Chem., 42 (1999) 1505.
Klebe, G., In Kubinyi, H. (Ed.) 3D QSAR in Drug Design: Theory, Methods and Applications, ESCOM, Leiden, 1993, p. 173.
Mattos, C. and Ringe, D., In Kubinyi, H. (Ed.) 3D QSAR in Drug Design: Theory, Methods and Applications, ESCOM, Leiden, 1993, p. 226.
Bohm, H.-J. and Klebe, G., Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. Engl., 35 (1996) 2588.
Grootenhuis, P.D.J. and van Helden, S.P., In Wipff, G. (Ed.) Computational Approaches in Supramolecular Chemistry, Kluwer Academic, Dordrecht, 1994, p. 137.
Babine, R.E. and Bender, S.L., Chem. Rev., 97 (1997) 1359.
Tripos Inc., St. Louis, MO, U.S.A.
Meng, E.C., Shoichet, B.K. and Kuntz, I.D., J. Comput. Chem., 13 (1992) 505.
Rohrer, D.C., In Carb6 R. (Ed.) Molecular Similarity and Reactivity: From Quantum Chemical to Phenomenological Approaches, Kluwer, Amsterdam, 1995, p. 141.
Mestres J., Rohrer, D.C. and Maggiora, G.M., J. Mol. Graph. Model, 15 (1997) 114.
Mestres, J., Rohrer, D.C. and Maggiora, G.M., J. Comput.-Aided Mol. Design, 13 (1999) 79.
Mestres, J., Rohrer, D.C. and Maggiora, G.M., J. Comput.-Aided Mol. Design, 14 (2000) 39.
Gasteiger, J. and Marsili, M., Tetrahedron 36 (1980) 3219.
Sadowski, J., Gasteiger, J. and Klebe, G., Inf. Comput. Sci., 34 (1994) 1000.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2000 Kluwer Academic Publishers
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Mestres, J., Knegtel, R.M. (2000). Similarity versus docking in 3D virtual screening. In: Klebe, G. (eds) Virtual Screening: An Alternative or Complement to High Throughput Screening?., vol 20. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/0-306-46883-2_11
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/0-306-46883-2_11
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-0-7923-6633-1
Online ISBN: 978-0-306-46883-4
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive