Skip to main content

Metaphysical Misgivings about “Brain Death”

  • Chapter
Beyond Brain Death

Part of the book series: Philosophy and Medicine ((PHME,volume 66))

  • 1110 Accesses

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Bibliography

  • Abbott, A.: 1997, ‘German law could boost prospects for organ transplants,’ Nature 3 July, 388, 4.

    Google Scholar 

  • Agich, G.J. and Jones R. P.: 1986, ‘Personal identity and brain death: A critical response,’ Philosophy & Public Affairs 15, 267–274.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aquinas, St. T.: 1947, Summa Theologiae. Blackfriars, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arnold, R.M. and Younger, S.J.: 1993, ‘The dead donor rule: Should we stretch it, bend it, or abandon it?’ Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal 3, 263–278.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beecher, H.K.: 1968, ‘A definition of irreversible coma. Report of the ad hoc committee of the Harvard Medical School to examine the definition of brain death,’ JAMA 205, 337–340.

    Google Scholar 

  • Becker, L.:1975, ‘Human being: The boundaries of the concept’ Philosophy and Public Affairs 4, 334–359.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bernat, J.L.: 1992, ‘How much of the brain must die in brain death,’ Journal of Clinical Ethics 3, no. 1, 21–26.

    Google Scholar 

  • Black, D., et al.: 1995, ‘Criteria for the diagnosis of brain stem death,’ Journal of the Royal College of Physicians, London 29, 381–382.

    Google Scholar 

  • Braine, D.: 1992, The Human Person: Animal and Spirit, University of Notre Dame Press, Notre Dame, Indiana.

    Google Scholar 

  • Byrne, P.A., O’Reilly, S., and Quay, P.M.: 1979, ‘Brain death: An opposing viewpoint,’ JAMA 242, 1985–1990.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Byrne, P.A. et al.: 1982/83, ‘Brain Death: The patient, the physician, and society,’ Gonzaga Law Review 18, no. 3, 429–516.

    Google Scholar 

  • Byrne, P.A. and Nilges, R.G.: 1993, ‘The brain stem in brain death: A critical review,’ Issues in Law and Medicine 9, no. 1, 3–21.

    Google Scholar 

  • Capron, A. and Kass, L.:1972, ‘A statutory definition of the standards for determining human death: An appraisal and a proposal,’ University of Pennsylvania Law Review 121, no. 1, 87–88.

    Google Scholar 

  • Capron, A. M.: 1987, ‘Anencephalic donors: Separate the dead from the dying,’ Hastings Center Report 17, no. 1, 5–9

    Google Scholar 

  • Capron, A.M.: 1993, ‘The tell-tale heart: Public policy and the utilization of non-heart-beating donors,’ Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal 3, 251–262.

    Google Scholar 

  • Catherwood, J.F.: 1992, ‘Rosencrantz and Guildenstern are “dead”?’ Journal of Medical Ethics 18, 34–39.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chagas, C.: 1986 (ed.), The Artificial Prolongation of Life and the Determination of the Exact Moment of Death, Pontifical Academy of Sciences, Vatican City.

    Google Scholar 

  • Conference of Medical Royal Colleges and their Faculties in the United Kingdom:1976, ‘Diagnosis of brain Death’ British Medical Journal 2, 1187–1188.

    Google Scholar 

  • Conference of Medical Royal Colleges and their Faculties in the United Kingdom: 1979, ‘Diagnosis of death,’ British Medical Journal 1, 332.

    Google Scholar 

  • Danish Council of Ethics: 1989, Death Criteria—A Report, The Danish Council of Ethics, Copenhagen.

    Google Scholar 

  • Evans, D.W. and Hill, D.J.: 1989, ‘The brain stems of organ donors are not dead,’ Catholic Medical Quarterly 40, no. 3, 113–120.

    Google Scholar 

  • Finnis, J.: 1980, Natural Law and Natural Rights, Clarendon Press, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fisher, A.: 1993, ‘On not starving the unconscious,’ New Blackfriars, 130–145.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fox, R.C.: 1993, ‘“An ignoble form of cannibalism”: Reflections on the Pittsburgh Protocol for procuring organs from non-heart-beating cadavers,’ Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal 3, 231–239.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gallagher, J.A.: 1990, Time Past, Time Future: An Historical Study of Catholic Moral Theology Paulist Press, New Jersey.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gillet, G.R.: 1986, ‘Why let people die?’ Journal of Medical Ethics 12, 83–86.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gillet, G.R.: 1990, ‘Consciousness, the brain and what matters ‘Bioethics 4, 181–198.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gillon, R.: 1990, ‘Death’ (editiorial), Journal of Medical Ethics 16, 3–4.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gormally, L.: 1993, ‘Definitions of personhood,’ Catholic Medical Quarterly 44, no. 4, 7–12.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gormally, L.: 1994, ‘The BMA Report on Euthanasia and the case against legalization’ in L. Gormally, (ed.), Euthanasia, Clinical Practice and the Law, The Linacre Centre for Health Care Ethics, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Green, M.B. and Wikler, D.: 1979, ‘Brain death and personal identity,’ Philosophy and Public Affairs 9, 105–133.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grisez, G. and Boyle, J.M.: 1979. Life and Death with Liberty and Justice. A Contribution to the Euthanasia Debate, University of Notre Dame Press, Notre Dame Indiana.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hardacre, H.: 1994, ‘Response of Buddhism and Shinto to the issue of brain death and organ transplantation,’ Cambridge Quarterly for Healthcare Ethics 3, 585–601.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hassaballah, A.M.: 1996, ‘Definition of death, organ donation and interruption of treatment in Islam,’ Nephrology Dialysis Transplantation 11, 964–965.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hassler, R.: 1977, ‘Basal ganglia systems regulating mental activity,’ International Journal of Neurology 12, 53–72.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoshino, K.: 1993, ‘Legal status of brain death in Japan: Why many Japanese do not accept “brain death” as a definition of death,’ Bioethics 7, 234–238.

    Google Scholar 

  • Iglesias, T.: 1991, ‘Death and the beginning of life,’ Ethics and Medicine 7, no. 2, 8–17.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jennett, B. and Plum, F.: 1972, ‘Persistent vegetative state after brain damage: A syndrome in search of a name,’ The Lancet 1, April 1, 734–737.

    Google Scholar 

  • John Paul II, Pope: 1995, EvangeliumVitae, Catholic Truth Society, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jonas, H.: 1974, ‘Against the stream.’ in H. Jonas, Philosophical essays: From Ancient Creed to Technological Man, Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey, pp. 132–140.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones, D.A.: 1995, ‘Nagging doubts about brain death,’ Catholic Medical Quarterly 47, no 3, 263–273.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaukinen, S., et al.: 1995, ‘Significance of electrical activity in brain-stem death,’ Intensive Care Medicine 21, 76–78.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kimura, R.: 1991, ‘Japan’s dilemma with the definition of death,’ Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal 1, 123–131.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lamb, D.: 1991, ‘Death in Denmark,’ Journal of Medical Ethics 17, 100–101.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lamb, D.: 1994, ‘What is death?’ in R. Gillon (ed.), Principles of Health Care Ethics, John Wiley and Sons, New York, pp. 1027–1040.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lamb, D.:1996, Death, Brain Death, and Ethics, Averbury, Brookfield, Vermont.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lizza, J.P.: 1993, ‘Persons and death: What’s metaphysically wrong with our current statutory definition of death?’ Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 18, 351–374.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lynn, J.: 1993, ‘Are the patients who become organ donors under the Pittsburgh Protocol for “non-heart-beating donors” really dead?’ Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal 3, 167–178.

    Google Scholar 

  • Matthews, G.B.: 1979, ‘Life and death as the arrival and departure of the Psyche,’ American Philosophical Quarterly 16, 151–156.

    Google Scholar 

  • McCullagh, P.: 1993, Brain Dead,Brain Absent Brain Donors. Wiley and Sons, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • McMahon, J.: 1995, ‘The metaphysics of brain death,’ Bioethics 9, 91–126.

    Google Scholar 

  • Olick, R.S.: 1991, ‘Brain death, religious freedom, and public policy: New Jersey’s landmark legislative initiative,’ Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal 1, 275–292.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pallis, C.: 1990, ‘Return to Elisinore,’ Journal of Medical Ethics 16, 10–13. Parfit, D.: 1986, Reasons and Persons, Oxford University Press, Oxford.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Parisi, J.E. et al.: 1982, ‘Brain death with prolonged somatic survival,’ New England Journal of Medicine 306, 14–16.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pentz, R.D.: 1994, ‘Veatch and brain death: A plea for the soul,’ Journal of Clinical Ethics, 5, 132–135.

    Google Scholar 

  • President’s Commission for the Study of Ethical problems in Medicine and Biomedicaland Behavioral Research: 1981. Defining Death: Medical, Legal and Ethical Issues in the Determination of Death, U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington.

    Google Scholar 

  • Puccetti, R.: 1988, ‘Does anyone survive neocortical death?’ in R. Zaner (ed.), Death: Beyond Whole Brain Criteria, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, The Netherlands, pp. 75–79.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rix, B.A.: 1990a, ‘Danish ethics council rejects brain death as the criterion of death,’ Journal of Medical Ethics 6, 5–7.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rix, B.A.: 1990b, ‘The importance of knowledge and trust in the definition of death,’ Bioethics 4, 232–236.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rothstein, J.: 1995, ‘Attending to transitions: A medical student’s encounter with transplantation,’ Making the Rounds in Health, Faith and Ethics 1, no 4, 1–5.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rutecki, G.W.: 1994, ‘Blurring distinctions between the dying and the dead: A call for discernment in organ donation,’ Ethics and Medicine 10, no 3, 60–67.

    Google Scholar 

  • Seifert, J.: 1992, ‘Is “brain death” actually death? A critique of redefining man’s death in terms of “brain death”,’ in R.J. White, H. Angstwurm, and I. Carrasco de Paula (eds.), Working Group on the Determination of Brain Death and its Relationship to Human Death, Pontifical Academy of Sciences, Vatican City, pp. 95–143.

    Google Scholar 

  • Seifert, J.: 1993, ‘Is “brain death” actually death?’ The Monist 76, 173–202.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shewmon, D.A.: 1985, ‘The metaphysics of braindeath,persistentvegetativestate and dementia,’ The Thomist 49, no 1, 24–80.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shewmon, D.A.: 1989, ‘“Brain death”: a valid theme with invalid variation, blurred by semantic ambiguity,’ in R. White, H. Angstwurm, and I. Carrasco de Paula (eds.), Working Group on the Determination of Brain Death and its Relationship to Human Death, Pontifical Academy of Sciences, Vatican City, pp. 23–51.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shewmon, D.A.: 1997, ‘Recovery from “brain death”: A neurologist’s apologia,’ Linacre Quarterly 64, 30–96.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shewmon, D.A., 1997. Cambridge Address.

    Google Scholar 

  • Singer, P.: 1995a, ‘Is the sanctity of life terminally ill?’ Bioethics 9, 327–343.

    Google Scholar 

  • Singer, P.: 1995b, Rethinking Life and Death, Oxford University Press, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Steinberg, A.: 1996, ‘Definition of death,’ Nephrology Dialysis Transplantation 11, 961–963.

    Google Scholar 

  • Submission to the Select Committee of the House of Lords on Medical Ethics by the Linacre Centre for Health Care Ethics: 1994, in Euthanasia, Clinical Practice and the Law, Linacre Centre, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Swinbanks, D.: 1997, ‘Japan reaches a compromise on organ transplants,’ Nature 387, 835.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tomlinson T.: 1984, ‘The conservative use of the brain death criteriona—critique.’ Journal of Medicine and Phylosophy 9, 377–394.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tomlinson, T.: 1990, ‘Misunderstanding death on a respirator,’ Bioethics 4, 253–264.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tomlinson, T.: 1993, ‘The irreversibility of death: Reply to Cole,’ Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal 3, 157–165.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tonti-Filippini, N.:1991, ‘Determining when death has occurred,’ Linacre Quarterly 58, no 1, 25–49.

    Google Scholar 

  • Troug, R.D.: 1997, ‘Is it time to abandon brain death?’ Hastings Center Report 27, no 1, 29–37.

    Google Scholar 

  • Veatch, R.M.: 1993. ‘The impending collapse of the whole-brain definition of death,’ Hastings Center Report 23, no 4, 18–24.

    Google Scholar 

  • Watanabe, Y.: 1994, ‘Why do I stand against the movement for cardiac transplantation in Japan?’ Japanese Heart Journal 35, 701–714.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weisbard, A.J.: 1993, ‘A polemic on principles: Reflections on the Pittsburgh Protocol,’ Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal 3, 217–230.

    Google Scholar 

  • White, R.J., Angstwurm, H., and Carrasco de Paula, I. (eds.). Working Group on the Determination of Brain Death and its Relationship to Human Death, Pontifical Academy of Sciences, Vatican City.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wikler, D.: 1993, ‘Brain death: A durable consensus?’ Bioethics 7, 239–246.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wiggins, D.: 1980, Sameness and Substance, BasilBlackwell, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams, B.: 1985, Ethics and the Limits of Philosophy, Fontana Press. London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wittgenstein. L.: 1953, Philosophical lnvestigations, translated by G.E.M. Anscombe, Basil Blackwell, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wreen, M.J.: 1987, ‘The definition of death,’ Public Affairs Quarterly 1, no 4, 87–99.

    Google Scholar 

  • Youngner, S.J. et al.: 1985, ‘Psychosocial and ethical implications of organ retrieval,’ New England Journal of Medicine 313, 321–324.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Youngner, S.J. et al.: 1989, ‘”Brain death and organ retrieval: a cross-sectional survey of knowledge and concepts among health professionals,’ JAMA 261, 2205–2210.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Youngner, S.J.: 1992, ‘Defining death: A superficial and fragile consensus,’ Archives of Neurology 49, 570–572.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2000 Kluwer Academic Publishers

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Jones, D.A. (2000). Metaphysical Misgivings about “Brain Death”. In: Beyond Brain Death. Philosophy and Medicine, vol 66. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/0-306-46882-4_3

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/0-306-46882-4_3

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-0-7923-6578-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-0-306-46882-7

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics