Skip to main content

Constitutional Liberty and Privacy: The Supreme Court and the Physician-Patient Relationship

  • Chapter
Strange Bedfellows
  • 141 Accesses

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Endnotes and References

  1. 405 U.S. 438 (1972).

    Google Scholar 

  2. 277 U.S. 438, 478 (1928) (Brandeis, J., dissenting).

    Google Scholar 

  3. It must be acknowledged at the outset that the Court has not openly embraced a right of personhood that incorporates liberty and privacy, prompting one commentator to observe that “it does not distinguish between privacy and autonomy and may be treating them both as aspects of ‘the right to be let alone.’” Louis Henkin, “Privacy and Autonomy,” Columbia Law Review (1974), 74: 1410–1433.

    Google Scholar 

  4. John Locke, An Essay Concerning Human Understanding, Peter H. Nidditch, ed., (Oxford: Cambridge University Press, 1975), Book II, Chapter 27, § 26.

    Google Scholar 

  5. For an important philosophical discussion of this point see Harry G. Frankfurt, “Freedom of the Will and the Concept of a Person,” Journal of Philosophy (1971), 68: 5–20.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Charles Taylor, Sources of the Self (Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1989), pp. 159–176.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Laurence H. Tribe, American Constitutional Law, 2nd ed., (Mineola, N.Y: Foundation Press, 1988), p. 1308. Laurence Tribe’s Chapter on “Rights of Privacy and Personhood” is an outstanding resource worthy of careful study.

    Google Scholar 

  8. For a detailed historical account of the events leading up to the litigation in Griswold see David J. Garrow, Liberty & Sexuality (New York: MacMillan Publishing Co., 1994), Ch. 4.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Griswold v. Connecticut, 381 U.S. 479 (1965).

    Google Scholar 

  10. 262 U.S. 390 (1923).

    Google Scholar 

  11. 268 U.S. 510 (1925).

    Google Scholar 

  12. 262 U.S. 390, 399 (1923).

    Google Scholar 

  13. 381 U.S. 479, 486–487 (1965).

    Google Scholar 

  14. 381 U.S. 479, 486–487 (1965).

    Google Scholar 

  15. 381 U.S. 479, 491, (1965) Goldberg, J., concurring.

    Google Scholar 

  16. 381 U.S. 479, 495, (1965) citing Prince v. Massachusetts, 321 U.S. 158, 166 (1944).

    Google Scholar 

  17. See, e.g., Henkin, note 3.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Randy E. Barnett, “Reconceiving the Ninth Amendment,” Cornell L. Rev. (1988), 74: 1–42, at 34–35.

    Google Scholar 

  19. 381 U.S. 479, 530, (1965) Steward, J., dissenting. For a contrary assessment see Barnett, note 19.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Even the Catholic journal Commonweal observed that “The entire round of court struggles was unnecessary, a dubious tribute to the power of a determined minority to impose their moral values on others.” Commonweal, June 25, 1965, pp. 427–428.

    Google Scholar 

  21. This dramatic change in attitude is pointed out in David J. Garrow, Liberty and Sexuality (New York: MacMillan Publishing Co., 1994).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2002 Kluwer Academic Publishers

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

(2002). Constitutional Liberty and Privacy: The Supreme Court and the Physician-Patient Relationship. In: Strange Bedfellows. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/0-306-46849-2_6

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/0-306-46849-2_6

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-0-306-46665-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-0-306-46849-0

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics