Skip to main content

Medical Ethics and Medical Jurisprudence: The Conceptual Landscape

  • Chapter
Strange Bedfellows
  • 202 Accesses

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Endnotes and References

  1. Tom L. Beauchamp and James F. Childress, Principles of Biomedical Ethics, Fourth Edition (New York: Oxford University Press, 1994), p. 189.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Hippocrates, Decorum (2), William Jones, trans. (Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1967), p. 297.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Interestingly, one extensive commentary on Percival’s Medical Ethics argues that it is misnamed, since the work deals almost exclusively with what might more aptly be characterized as medical etiquette, which concerns the physician’s responsibilities toward other physicians, not toward patients. Chauncey D. Leak, ed., Percival’s Medical Ethics (Baltimore: Williams & Wilkins Co., 1927).

    Google Scholar 

  4. American Medical Association Code of Medical Ethics, (N.Y.: William Wood & Co., 2nd ed., 1868).

    Google Scholar 

  5. 63 Federal Register 16296.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Beauchamp and Childress, note 1, pp. 37–40.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Beauchamp and Childress, Beauchamp and Childress, note 1, pp. 111.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Olmstead v. United States, 277 U.S. 438, 478 (1928) (Brandeis, J., dissenting).

    Google Scholar 

  9. For a detailed discussion of utilitarianism see David Lyons, Forms and Limits of Utilitarianism (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1965).

    Google Scholar 

  10. For a general discussion of Kant’s moral philosophy see H. J. Paton, The Categorical Imperative (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1948).

    Google Scholar 

  11. Immanuel Kant, Fundamental Principles of the Metaphysics of Morals, · 1, ThomasKingsmill Abbot, trans., (London: Longmans Green, 1927).

    Google Scholar 

  12. Alasdair MacIntyre, After Virtue—A Study in Moral Theory, 2nd ed., (Notre Dame: University of Notre Dame Press, 1984).

    Google Scholar 

  13. MacIntyre, note 13, p. 191.

    Google Scholar 

  14. MacIntyre, note 13, p. 195.

    Google Scholar 

  15. For further discussion of the powerful influence of health care institutions on the virtues in medical practice see Leon Kass, “Practicing Ethics: Where’s the Action?” Hastings Center Report (1990), 20: 5–12.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Earl E. Shelp, ed., Virtue andMedicine (Dordrecht: Reidel, 1985).

    Google Scholar 

  17. Edmund D. Pellegrino and David C. Thomasma, The VirtuesinMedical Practice (New York: Oxford University Press, 1993).

    Google Scholar 

  18. MacIntyre, note 13, p. 220.

    Google Scholar 

  19. MacIntyre, After Virtue—A Study in Moral Theory, 2nd ed., (Notre Dame: University of Notre Dame Press, 1984) note 13, p. 218.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Carol Gilligan, In A Different Voice (Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1982).

    Google Scholar 

  21. For a more general discussion of the ethics of care see Nel Noddings, Caring: A Feminine Approach to Ethics and Moral Education (Berkeley: University of California Press, 1984).

    Google Scholar 

  22. See, e.g., Sara T. Fry, “The Role of Caring in aTheoryof Nursing Ethics,” in Helen Baccarat Holmes and Laura M. Pard, eds., Feminist Perspectives in Medical Ethics (Bloomington: Indiana University Press, 1992).

    Google Scholar 

  23. John Hardwig, “What About the Family?,” Hastings Center Report, (1990), 19(2): 5–10.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Karl Llewellyn, The Bramble Bush — On Our Law and Its Study (New York: Oceana Publications, Inc., 1950), p. 48.

    Google Scholar 

  25. The case to which they refer is not the physician-assisted suicide case, Quill v. Vacco, but the same Dr. Quill’s chronicle of his provision of a lethal prescription to his terminal patient Diane. Timothy E. Quill, Death and Dignity: Making Choices and Taking Charge (New York: Norton, 1993), Ch. 8.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Albert R. Jonsen and Stephen E. Toulmin, The Abuse of Casuistry: A History of Moral Reasoning (Berkeley: University of California Press, 1988), p. 10.

    Google Scholar 

  27. In the Matter of Karen Quinlan, 355 A.2d 647 (N.J. 1976).

    Google Scholar 

  28. See, e.g., Bennett B. Patterson, The Forgotten Ninth Amendment (Indianapolis: Bobbs Merrill, 1955); Luis Kutner, “The Neglected Ninth Amendment: The Other Rights Retained by the People,” Marquette L. Rev. (1968), 51: 121–142.

    Google Scholar 

  29. In Edwards v. California, 314 U.S. 160 (1841) Justice Jackson stated in a concurring opinion that “instances of valid ‘privileges or immunities’ must be but few” (p. 183).

    Google Scholar 

  30. Poe v. Ullman, 367 U.S. 497, 543 (1961) (Harlan, J., dissenting).

    Google Scholar 

  31. Meyer v. Nebraska, 262 U.S. 390 (1923).

    Google Scholar 

  32. Pierce v. Society of Sisters, 268 U.S. 510 (1925).

    Google Scholar 

  33. Skinner v. Oklahoma, 316 U.S. 535 (1942).

    Google Scholar 

  34. Rochin v. California, 342 U.S. 165 (1952).

    Google Scholar 

  35. Washington v. Glucksberg, 138 L.Ed.2d 772,797 (1997).

    Google Scholar 

  36. 138 L.Ed.2d 771, 830 (1997) (Souter, J. concurring).

    Google Scholar 

  37. See, e.g., Colo. Rev. Stat. §12-36-117(1.5)(a) (1997).

    Google Scholar 

  38. In Re Guess, 393 S.E.2d 833 (Sup. Ct. N.C. 1990).

    Google Scholar 

  39. 42 U.S.C.A. § 1395dd.

    Google Scholar 

  40. Barry R. Furrow, “An Overview and Analysis of the Impact of the Emergency Medical Treatment and Active Labor Act,” Journal of LegalMedicine (1995), 16:325–355, pp. 352–353.

    Google Scholar 

  41. 42 U.S.C.A. § 1395 cc.

    Google Scholar 

  42. Nancy C. Elder, F. David Schneider, Steven C. Zweig, Philip G. Peters, John W. Ely, “Community Attitudes and Knowledge about Advance Care Directives,” Journal of the American Board of Family Practice (1992), 5: 565–572.

    Google Scholar 

  43. The SUPPORT Principal Investigators, “A Controlled Trial to Improve Care for Seriously Ill Hospitalized Patients,” Journal of the American Medical Association (1995), 274: 1591–1598.

    Google Scholar 

  44. Social Security Act, § § 1128B(a); 42 U.S.C.A. §1320a-7b.

    Google Scholar 

  45. 31 U.S.C.A. §3729.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2002 Kluwer Academic Publishers

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

(2002). Medical Ethics and Medical Jurisprudence: The Conceptual Landscape. In: Strange Bedfellows. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/0-306-46849-2_2

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/0-306-46849-2_2

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-0-306-46665-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-0-306-46849-0

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics