Abstract
The teat is the main entrance for pathogens into the mammary gland. It also acts as a sensory, motor and primary defence organ. This latter function is important in preventing intramammary infections while efficiency in preventing new infections is determined by teat tissue integrity. Machine milking may evoke mechanical and circulatory impairment in teat tissues. These local metabolic disorders may decrease the efficiency of the local immune defence mechanisms. Teat tissue changes can be estimated by measuring teat thickness before and after milking. Experimental and field studies showed a high correlation between changes in thickness and infection risk. Teats with >5% change in thickness have significantly increased teat duct colonisation rates and intramammary infection rates. The link between changes in teat thickness and infections should be found in changes in local immune defences and measurable changes in cytological and biochemical immune factors are expected. Indeed, the application of experimental milking conditions (i.e. no pulsation milking and positive pressure milking) showed to have a significant influence on some non specific immune factors in teat secretion. Positive pressure milking increases PMNs content and decreases macrophages content of teat secretion. Some enzymes such as NAGase and lysozyme were decreased by positive pressure milking, the concentration of the same enzymes were higher after no pulsation milking. A better knowledge on the interaction between the teat apex immune defense mechanisms and the machine milking process is necessary to reduce the new infection rate of the bovine mammary gland.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Blum, J.W., D. Schams And R. Bruckmaier (1989): Catecholamines, oxytocin and milk removal in dairy cows. J. Dairy Res. 56, 167–177
Bronzo, V., Hamann, J.& Zecconi, A.1995. Changes in anatomical, cytological and biochemical parameters of the teat associated with the use of three different milking units. Proc. 3rd Int.Mastitis SeminarTel Aviv, 1, 110–113.
Craven, N. & Williams, M. R. 1985. Defences of the bovine mammary gland against infection and prospects for their enhancement. Veterinary Immunology & Immunopathology 10 71–127
Du Preez, J.H. (1985): Teat canal infections. Kiel. Milchwirtschaftl. Forschungs-berichte, 267–273
Fox, L. K. and M. S. Cumming (1996): Relationship between thickness, chapping and Staphylococcus aureus colonization of the bovine teat tissue. J. Dairy Res. 63, 369–375
Hamann, J. 1985. Measurement of machine milking induced teat tissue reactions. Milchwissenschaft 40 16–18.
Hamann, J. 1987. Effect of machine milking on teat end condition—a literature review. IDF-Bulletin, No 215, 33–53
Hamann, J. and C. Burvenich 1994. Physiological status of the bovine teat. IDF-Bulletin NO 297, 3–12
King, J. S. 1981. Streptococcus uberis: A review of its role as a causative organism of bovine mastitis. II. Control of infection. Br. Vet. J. 137, 160–165
Morse, G. E. and J. Platonov 1964. Basic studies of bovine mastitis: I. The role of the teat canal as a barrier to udder infections with Streptococcus agalactiae. J. Dairy Sci. 47, 696–700
Nickerson, S. C. & Pankey, J. W. 1983. Cytologic obdervations of the bovine teat end. J. Vet. Res. 44 1433–1441.
Outerridge, P. M. & Lee, C. S. 1988 The defence mechanism of the mammary gland of domestic ruminants. Moving Frontiers in Veterinary Immunology. R. Pandey. Basel, Karger: 165–196.
Pankey, J. W., R. J. Eberhart, A. L. Cumming, R. D. Daggett, R. J: Farnsworth and C. K. Mcduff 1984. Uptake of postmilking teat antisepsis. J. Dairy Sci. 67, 1336–1353
Peeters, G., R. Coussens and G. Sierens 1949. Physiology of the nerves in the bovine mammary gland. Arch. Int. Pharmacodyn. Ther. 79: 75–82
Peeters, G., A. Houvenaghel, E. Roets, A.-M. Massart-Leen, R. Verbeke, G. Dhondt and F. Verschooten 1979. Electromagnetic blood flow recording and balance of nutrients in the udder of the lactating cow. J. Anim. Sci. 48: 1143–1153
SCHULTZE, W.D. and S.C. BRIGHT 1983. Changes in penetrability of bovine papillary duct to endotoxin after milking. Am. J. Vet. Res. 44: 2373–2375
Smith, A., H.G.J. Coetzee 1979. The survival of Staphylococcus aureus on teats and orifices of cows in the dry period. S. Afr. J. Dairy Technol. 11 79–81
Tagand, R. 1932. Anatomie des vaisseaux mammaires. Lait XII: 881–893
Zecconi, A., Hamann, J., Bronzo, V.& Ruffo, G. 1992. Machine-induced teat tissue reaction and infection risk in a dairy herd from contagious mastitis pathogens. J.Dairy Research 59 265–271.
Zecconi, A., Bronzo, V., Piccinini, R., Moroni, P.& Ruffo, G. 1996. Field study on the relationship between teat thickness changes and intramammary infections
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2002 Kluwer Academic Publishers
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Zecconi, A., Hamanno, J., Bronzo, V., Moroni, P., Giovannini, G., Piccinini, R. (2002). Relationship Between Teat Tissue Immune Defences and Intramammary Infections. In: Mol, J.A., Clegg, R.A. (eds) Biology of the Mammary Gland. Advances in Experimental Medicine and Biology, vol 480. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/0-306-46832-8_33
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/0-306-46832-8_33
Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA
Print ISBN: 978-0-306-46414-0
Online ISBN: 978-0-306-46832-2
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive