Advertisement

Alternative assessment for software engineering education

  • Jody Paul
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 750)

Abstract

In this paper we present a new architecture for assessment that involves the integration of hypermedia with key requirements for advancing students' education. The result is an interactive system for assessing student competence that fosters individualized progress through a given software engineering curriculum and provides instructors and administrators with quantitative, standardized assessments of confidence, states of knowledge, and problem-solving ability. We present preliminary results of our prototype development effort and describe an architecture and rationale for such systems.

Keywords

Knowledge State Intelligent Tutoring System Single Correct Answer Alternative Assessment Method Drawing Space 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    P. W. Airasian, Classroom Assessment. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1991.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    R. W. Sweezey, Individual Performance Assessment: An Approach to Criterion-Referenced Test Development. Reston: Reston Publishing Company, Inc., 1981.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    R. Freedle, ed. Artificial Intelligence and the Future of Testing. Hillsdale: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 1990.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    B. R. Gifford and M. C. O'Connor, eds. Changing Assessments: Alternative Views of Aptitude, Achievement and Instruction. Boston: Kluwer Academic Publishers, 1992.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    M. Priestley, Performance Assessment in Education and Training: Alternative Techniques. Englewood Cliffs: Educational Technology Publications, 1982.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    T. Kellaghan, G. F. Madaus, and P. W. Airasian, The Effects of Standardized Testing. Boston: Kluwer-Nijhoff Publishing, 1982.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    A. Dworkin and N. Dworkin, Problem Solving Assessment. Novato: Academic Therapy Publications, 1988.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    R. J. Sternberg, ”CAT: A Program of Comprehensive Abilities Testing,” in Changing Assessments: Alternative Views of Aptitude, Achievement and Instruction, B. R. Gifford and M. C. O'Connor, eds. Boston: Kluwer Academic Publishers, 1992. p. 213–274.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    K. McKeown. User-Oriented Explanation for Expert Systems. Department of Computer Science, Columbia University, CUCS-85-83, 1983.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    K. R. McKeown, M. Wish, and K. Mathews. Tailoring Explanations for the User. Department of Computer Science, Columbia University, COCS-172-85, 1985.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    B. J. Grosz, ”Discourse Analysis,” in Understanding Spoken Language, D. E. Walker, eds. Elsevier North-Holland, 1978. p. 235–268.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    P. H. Wood and P. D. Holt, Intelligent Tutoring Systems: An Annotated Bibliography. SIGART Bulletin, 1990. 1(1): p. 21–42.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    H. S. Nwana, Intelligent Tutoring Systems: An Overview. Artificial Intelligence Review, 1990. 4(4): p. 251–277.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    T. Murray and B. P. Woolf, A Knowledge Acquisition Tool for Intelligent Computer Tutors. SIGART Bulletin, 1991. 2(2): p. 9–21.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    J. A. Jensen and T. Nissen, Paedagogik, Psykologi, Hypermedier: Hypermediers paedagogiske potentiale i erkendelsesteoretisk og kognitionsteoretisk perspektiv. Psyke and Logos, 1988. 9(2): p. 419–442.Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    J. Paul, “Hypermedia-based Interactive Student-Assessment System (HISAS): Concept and Architecture,” in Educational Multimedia and Hypermedia Annual, 1993, H. Maurer, ed. Charlottesville: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education, 1993. p. 415–421.Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    M. C. O'Connor, ”Rethinking Aptitude, Achievement and Instruction: Cognitive Science Research and the Framing of Assessment Policy,” in Changing Assessments: Alternative Views of Aptitude, Achievement and Instruction, B. R. Gifford and M. C. O'Connor, eds. Boston: Kluwer Academic Publishers, 1992. p. 9–35.Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    L. B. Resnick and D. P. Resnick, “Assessing the Thinking Curriculum: New Tools for Educational Reform,” in Changing Assessments: Alternative Views of Aptitude, Achievement and Instruction, B. R. Gifford and M. C. O'Connor, eds. Boston: Kluwer Academic Publishers, 1992. p. 37–75.Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    L. A. Shepard, “What Policy Makers Who Mandate Tests Should Know About the New Psychology of Intellectual Ability and Learning,” in Changing Assessments: Alternative Views of Aptitude, Achievement and Instruction, B. R. Gifford and M. C. O'Connor, eds. Boston: Kluwer Academic Publishers, 1992. p. 301–328.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 1993

Authors and Affiliations

  • Jody Paul
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Computer Science and EngineeringUniversity of Colorado at DenverDenver

Personalised recommendations