Advertisement

When the golden arches gang aft agley: Incorporating software engineering into computer science

  • Kenneth L. Modesitt
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 750)

Abstract

The incorporation of software engineering into an existing university computer science curriculum involves major cultural and content changes. Considerable persistence is required (note the golden arches), yet even the best laid plans do not always suffice (note quotation from famous poem by Burns). This is particularly true for those departments which have a strong mathematics emphasis — a common phenomenon in many comprehensive universities (M.S. granting) today. Despite the major challenges involved in such change, the rewards are many. The beneficiaries include: current students, graduates, employers, computer science faculty, the university, and society.

Keywords

Computer Science Software Engineering Assembly Language Current Student Data Flow Diagram 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    ACM, Curriculum '91, ACM Press, New York, 1991.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Boehm, B., Software Engineering Economics, McGraw-Hill, 1986.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Brooks, B., “No Silver Bullet: Essence and Accidents of Software Engineering”, Computer, IEEE, April, 1987, pp. 10–19.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Bruegge, B. “Teaching an Industry-Oriented Software Engineering Course”, Software Engineering Education, SEI Conference, Springer/Verlag, October, 1992.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Burns, R., “To A Mouse, on Turning Her up in her Nest with a Plough, November, 1785”, The Poems and Songs of Robert Burns, p. 125.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Computing Sciences Accreditation Board, “Criteria for Accrediting Programs in Computer Science in the United States”, June, 1992.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    DeMarco, T., Controlling Software Projects. Yourdon Press, 1982.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Frailey, D. “CS Employers: What They Want,” Syllabus on Computer Science, Syllabus Press, Sunnyvale, CA, Spring, 1992, pp. 8–9.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Gilb, T., Principles of Software Management. McGraw-Hill, 1989.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Hoare, C.A.R., “The Engineering of Software: A Startling Contradiction”, Computer Bulletin, December, 1975.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Johnson, D. W., R.T. Johnson, and K. A. Smith, Cooperative Learning: Increasing College Faculty Instructional Productivity. ASHE-ERIC Higher Education Report No. 4, 1991.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Kaufman, R., Identifying and Solving Problems. Third Edition, University Associates, San Diego, CA, 1982.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Koen, B., Definition of the Engineering Method. American Society for Engineering Education, Washington, D.C., 1985.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Koen, B., “The Engineering Method and the State-of-the-Art”, Engineering Education, April, 1986, pp. 570–674.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Modesitt, K., “Computer-based Learning, Expert Systems, and Software Engineering: Advanced Tools for Engineering Education Now and in 2001”, International Journal of Applied Engineering Education, Tempus Publications, vol. 7, No. 6, 1991, pp. 452–455. Also presented at the Frontiers in Education Conference, American Society for Engineering Education, Vienna, 1990, and at Bond University, Gold Coast, Queensland, Australia, 1990.Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Modesitt, K., Computer Science in the Real World: Expert Systems, Software Engineering, and Computer-based Learning: Engineering of Complex Reliable Software Systems, and How Computers Can Help People Learn to Build Them. Two-week series of invited lectures given to the Department of Computer Science and Engineering, University of Science and Technology, Beijing, People's Republic of China, June, 1991.Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Modesitt, K., “Computer Based Learning: Important Problems, Creative People, and Powerful Affordable Tools,” Journal of Computer-Based Instruction, Vol. 9, May, 1983, pp. 26–33. IEEE International Conference on Consumer Electronics, June, 1983, pp. 206–207. Also Association of Educational Data Systems (AEDS) National Conference, 1983, pp. 213–217; National Society for Performance and Instruction (NSPI) National Conference, 1983.Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Modesitt, K. “Software Engineering Training for TI Middle Management,” Invited Presentation for ACM National Conference, 1980.Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Moore F. and P. Purvis, “Meeting the Training Need of Practicing Software Engineers with the Defense System Electronics Group,” Texas Instruments Technical Journal, May–June, 1989, pp. 61–67.Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    NTU, “NTU Celebrating Five Years,” NTU UPLINK, National Technological University, Vol. 5., Num. 4, April, 1990.Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Pressman, R., Software Engineering: A Practitioner's Approach, Third Edition, McGraw-Hill, 1992.Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    SACS, Criteria for Accreditation: Commission on Colleges. Southern Association of Colleges and Schools, 1988.Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Shapiro, M., “Software is a product ... NOT!” IEEE Computer, September, 1992, p. 128.Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Taguchi, G. and M.S. Phadke, “Quality Engineering Through Design Optimization,” Proceedings of the Globecom 84 Meeting, IEEE Communication Society, 1984, pp. 1106–1113.Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Technology Reinvestment Project, “Program Information Package for Defense Technology Conversion, Reinvestment, and Transition Assistance, Arlington, VA March 10, 1993.Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Yourdon, E., Tools and Techniques of Modern Software Engineering. Yourdon Press, 1987.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 1993

Authors and Affiliations

  • Kenneth L. Modesitt
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Computer ScienceWestern Kentucky UniversityBowling Green

Personalised recommendations