Investigation of Fracture Parameters of Jute/Glass Reinforced Hybrid Composite and Analysis by Using FEA

  • Venkata Sushma ChintaEmail author
  • P. Ravinder Reddy
  • Koorapati Eshwara Prasad
  • Krishna Sai Vadapally
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Mechanical Engineering book series (LNME)


These days the interest of people has shifted toward using natural fibers as reinforcement in the preparation of polymer composite material. Having superior properties such as lower density, higher stiffness, better mechanical properties and since the natural fibers are abundantly available, being renewable and biodegradable, the natural fiber-based composite preparation has become a wide area for research activity. This paper deals with the testing and analysis of the single edge notch bend specimen for the estimation of fracture toughness of the material. Six SENB hybrid composite specimens made of glass fibers, jute fibers and epoxy are prepared as per ASTM D-5045. Then, the models of hybrid composite are created in ANSYS to find J-integral and stress intensity factor. The purpose is to retain sufficient mechanical properties by adding layers of glass fiber, at the same time ensuring a lower cost and lower weight by reinforcing intermediate layers of jute fiber in it. Determining the mechanical characteristics of hybrid composite laminate was carried out by three-point bending test so as to compare it with ASTM D-5045 test method’s manual. Wherein, the results of the test specimens have satisfied the necessary conditions put forth by the test manual. Mechanical characteristics obtained with hybrid jute reinforced glass laminates enable the substitution of glass fiber by other natural fibers for moderately loaded applications to combine performance and economy.


Jute/glass fiber Hybrid composite SENB J-integral Stress intensity factor 


  1. 1.
    Muthuvel M, Ranganath G (2013) Characterization study of jute and glass fiber reinforced hybrid composite material. Int J Eng Res Technol 2(4):335–344Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Chinta VS, Nagini Y, Sandhya V (2018) Investigation of mechanical properties of bidirectional carbon/glass reinforced epoxy hybrid composites. Int J Mech Prod Eng Res Dev 8(3):449–456Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Sudeep D, Rangaswamy T (2014) Effect of fillers on E-glass/jute fiber reinforced epoxy composites. Int J Eng Res Appl 4(8):118–123Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Hamza B, Elhaddi H (2016) Hybrid jute/glass reinforced laminate mechanical properties. J Civil Environ Eng 6(4):1–5Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Mazharul I (2016) Fabrication and characterization of jute-glass fiber reinforced polyester hybrid composites. Int J Sci Eng Res 7(9):1708–1719Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Sanjay MR, Yogesha B (2016) Studies on mechanical properties of jute/E-glass fiber reinforced epoxy hybrid composites. J Miner Mater Charact Eng 4(1):15–25Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Harikrishnan KR, Deviprasad V (2015) Mode I fracture toughness of jute/glass fiber hybrid composite—an experimental and numerical study. Int J Eng Trends Technol 28(6):307–310CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Raghavendra, G., Ojha S (2013) Jute fiber reinforced epoxy composites and comparison with the glass and neat epoxy composites. J Compos Mater 48(20):2537–2547CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Maneesh T, Singh VK (2012) Evaluation of mechanical properties of Bagasse-glass fiber reinforced composite. J Mater Environ Sci 3(1):171–184Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Zhang Y, Li Y (2013) Tensile and interfacial properties of unidirectional flax/glass fiber reinforced hybrid composites. Compos Sci Technol 88(2013):172–177CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Bindal A, Singh S (2013) Development of glass/jute fibers reinforced polyester composite. Indian J Mater Sci 1–6Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Rafiquzzaman Md, Mahbuba Z (2017) Jute-glass fiber based composite for engineering application. Eur J Adv Eng Technol 4(7):510–515Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Ramesh M, PalaniKumar K (2013) Mechanical property evaluation of sisal-jute glass fiber reinforced polyester composites. Compos Part B Eng 48(48):1–9CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Ansar MA, Singh D (2013) Fatigue analysis of glass fiber reinforced composites. Int J Eng Res Appl 3(3):588–591Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Jagannatha TD, Harish G (2015) Mechanical properties of carbon/glass fiber reinforced epoxy hybrid polymer composites. Int J Mech Eng Robot Res 4(2):131–137Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Patil D (2013) Mechanical property of glass fiber reinforcement epoxy composites. Int J Sci Eng Res 1(4):6–9Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Natarajan K, Padma CB (2014) Study of mechanical and morphological properties of glass fiber reinforced modified epoxy composites. Int J Res Eng Technol 3(1):1–6CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    AkmSamsur R (2015) Thermal and mechanical properties of woven glass fiber reinforced epoxy composites with carbon nano tubes grown in-situ. The Int J Eng Sci 4(12):54–61Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    SrikanthRao D, Ravinder Reddy P (2016) Determination of mode 1 Fracture toughness of epoxy-glass fiber composite laminate. In: 11th international symposium on plasticity and impact mechanics, implast vol 173, pp 1678–1683Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Hana J, Yonjig K (2015) Mode 1 fracture toughness of carbon-glass/epoxy inter ply hybrid composites. J Mech Sci Technol 29(5):1955–1962CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Hatice T, Ayşegül A (2017) Development of carbon-glass fiber reinforced hybrid composites by vacuum infusion technique. J Turkish Chem Soc 1(2):35–42Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Bakker Ad (1982) Elastic-plastic fracture mechanics analysis of an SENB specimen. Int J Press Vessels Pip 10(6):431–449CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Cicero S, Madrazo V (2012) Estimation of fracture toughness by testing notched fracture specimens and applying the theory of critical distances. Int Sch Res Not 1–8CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    ASTM D-5045 Standard Test Methods for Plane Strain Fracture Toughness and Strain Energy Release Rate of Plastic MaterialsGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Sushma CV, Ravinder Reddy P, Rama Lakshmi P (2013) Investigation of fracture parameters of compact tension specimen by FEA. Int J Eng Res Technol 2(6):1587–1591 Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Sushma CV, RavinderReddy P, Rama Lakshmi P (2013) Investigation of stress intensity factor of aluminium plate by FEA. In: Proceedings of national conference on advances in mechanical engineering & renewable energy, March 2013, CBITGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  • Venkata Sushma Chinta
    • 1
    Email author
  • P. Ravinder Reddy
    • 1
  • Koorapati Eshwara Prasad
    • 2
  • Krishna Sai Vadapally
    • 1
  1. 1.Chaitanya Bharathi Institute of Technology (A)HyderabadIndia
  2. 2.Siddhartha Institute of Engineering and TechnologyHyderabadIndia

Personalised recommendations