Urban Grassroots Movements in Post-socialist Czechia: Spatial, Social, Cultural, and Political Context

  • Michaela Pixová


This chapter provides a conceptual, theoretical, and contextual introduction of the research this book is based on. It contextualizes the role of urban grassroots movements in cities undergoing neoliberal restructuring and outlines the advantages of the political process theory in researching the Czech situation. The following sections provide the spatial and sociocultural context of these movements, focusing on the characteristics of Czech cities under socialism and post-socialism, and of the civil society and political culture in Czechia. Czech urban grassroots movements are conceptualized here as an important challenge to the democratic deficit in Czech cities, whose perspectives reveal the defining features of Czech urban conflicts. Attention is paid to the problem of corporate capture of the Czech state and the way it affects urban processes.


Urban grassroots movements Neoliberal restructuring Democratic deficit State capture Post-socialism 


  1. Aslanidis, P. (2017). Populism and social movements. In C. R. Kaltwasser, P. Taggart, P. O. Espejo, & P. Ostiguy (Eds.), The oxford handbook of populism (pp. 1–24). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  2. Attoh, K. A. (2011). What kind of right is the right to the city? Progress in Human Geography, 35(5), 669–685.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bělohradský, V., et al. (2010). Kritika depolitizovaného rozumu: Úvahy (nejen) o nové normalizaci. Prague: Grimmus.Google Scholar
  4. Bouzarovski, S., Sýkora, L., & Matoušek, R. (2016). Locked-in post-socialism: Rolling path dependencies in Liberec’s district heating system. Eurasian Geography and Economics, 57(4–5), 624–642.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Brenner, N., Marcuse, P., & Mayer, M. (2009). Cities for people, not for profit: Critical urban theory and the right to the city. London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Brenner, N., & Theodore, N. (2003). Spaces of neoliberalism: Urban restructuring in North America and Western Europe. Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar
  7. Brenner, N., & Theodore, N. (2005). Neoliberalism and the urban condition. City, 9(1), 101–107.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Buden, B. (2013). Konec postkomunismu: Od společnosti bez naděje k naději bez společnosti. Prague: Rybka Publishers.Google Scholar
  9. Caiani, M., & Císař, O. (2018). Movements, parties, and ‘movement parties’ of the radical right. In M. Caiani & O. Císař (Eds.), Radical right movement parties in Europe (pp. 11–26). New York, NY: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Caren, N. (2006). Political process theory. In G. Ritzer (Ed.), Blackwell encyclopedia of sociology. New York: Blackwell.Google Scholar
  11. Castells, M. (1977). The urban question: A Marxist approach. London: Edward Arnold.Google Scholar
  12. Castells, M. (1983). The city and the grassroots: A cross-cultural theory of urban social movements. Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  13. Císař, O. (2008). Politický aktivismus v České republice. Sociální hnutí a občanská společnost v období transformace a evropeizace. Brno: CDK.Google Scholar
  14. Cooper, C., & Morpeth, N. (1998). The impact of tourism on residential experience in Central-Eastern Europe: the development of a new legitimation crisis in the Czech Republic. Urban Studies, 35(12), 2253–2275.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Della Porta, D., & Diani, M. (1999). Social movements. An Introduction: Blackwell.Google Scholar
  16. Domoradzka, A. (2017). Leveling the playfield: Urban movement in the strategic action field of urban policy in Poland. In J. Hou & S. Knierbein (Eds.), City unsilenced: Urban resistance and public space in the age of shrinking democracy (pp. 106–118). Abingdon: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Durnová, A. (2015). Planning through emotions: Political Lessons from the controversy between ‘fat cats’ and ‘stupid activists’ over rebuilding Brno railroad station. In E. Gualini (Ed.), Planning and conflict: Critical perspectives on contentious urban developments (pp. 259–278). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  18. Dvořáková, V. (2003). Civil society in the Czech Republic: ‘Impulse 99’ and “Thank You, Time To Go’. In P. Kopecky & C. Mudde (Eds.), Uncivil society? Contentious politics in post-communist Europe (pp. 134–156). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  19. Dvořáková, V. (2012). Rozkládání státu. Praha: Universum.Google Scholar
  20. Ekiert, G., & Foa, R. (2011). Civil society weakness in Post-communist Europe: A preliminary assessment (Carlo Alberto Notebooks 198). Moncalieri: Collegio Carlo Alberto.Google Scholar
  21. Gagyi, A. (2015). Social movement studies for east central Europe? The challenge of a time-space bias on postwar western societies: Intersections. East European Journal of Society and Politics, 1(3), 16–36.Google Scholar
  22. Gualini, E. (2015). Planning and conflict: Critical perspectives on contentious urban developments. New York: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Gualini, E., Mourato, J. M., & Allegra, M. (2015). Conflict in the city. Berlin: Jovis.Google Scholar
  24. Guasti, P. (2016). Development of citizen participation in Central and Eastern Europe after the EU enlargement and economic crisis. Communist and Post-Communist Studies, 49(3), 219–231.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Hadjiisky, M. (2001). The failure of the participatory democracy in the Czech Republic. West European Politics, 24(3), 43–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Harvey, D. (1982). The limits to capital. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
  27. Harvey, D. (1989a). The condition of postmodernity: An enquiry into the origins of cultural change. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
  28. Harvey, D. (1989b). From managerialism to entrepreneurialism: The transformation in urban governance in late capitalism. Geografiska Annaler: Series B, Human Geography, 71(1), 3–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Harvey, D. (2005). A brief history of neoliberalism. USA: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  30. Harvey, D. (2008). The right to the city. New Left Review, 53, 23–40.Google Scholar
  31. Harvey, D. (2012). Rebel cities. New York: Verso.Google Scholar
  32. Hellman, J. S., Jones, G., Kaumann, D. (2000). Seize the state, seize the day: State capture, corruption and influence in transition (World Bank Policy Research Working Paper No. 2444, pp. 2–3). Washington DC: World Bank.Google Scholar
  33. Hoffman, L., & Musil, J. (1999). Prague, tourism and the post-industrial city. Chicago: Great Cities Institute.Google Scholar
  34. Hoffman, L. M. (1994). After the fall: Crisis and renewal in urban planning in the Czech Republic. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 18(4), 691–702.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Holý, L. (2010). Malý český člověk a skvělý český národ: Národní identita a postkomunistická transformace společnosti. Praha: Slon.Google Scholar
  36. Horak, M. (2007). Governing the post-communist city: Institutions and democratic development in Prague. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Hou, J., & Knierbein, S. (2017). City unsilenced: Urban resistance and public space in the age of shrinking democracy. Abingdon: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Howard, M. M. (2003). The weakness of civil society in post-communist Europe. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Innes, A. (2013). The political economy of state capture in Central Europe. Journal of Common Market Studies, 52(1), 88–104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Innes, A. (2016). Corporate state capture in open societies: The emergence of corporate brokerage party systems. East European Politics and Societies: and Cultures, 30(3), 594–620.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Jacobsson, K. (2015). Urban grassroots movements in Central and Eastern Europe. Farnham: Ashgate.Google Scholar
  42. Jacobsson, K., & Saxonberg, S. (2013). Beyond NGO-ization: The development of social movements in Central and Eastern Europe. Farnham: Ashgate.Google Scholar
  43. Jehlička, P., & Kostelecký, T. (1995). Czechoslovak greens in a post-communist society. In D. Richardson & C. Rootes (Eds.), The green challenge: The development of green parties in Europe (pp. 208–231). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  44. Kaufmann, D., & Vicente, P. C. (2011). Legal corruption. Economics and Politics, 23(2), 195–219.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Klein, N. (2007). The shock doctrine: The rise of disaster capitalism. Toronto: Random House of Canada.Google Scholar
  46. Klíma, M. (2015). Od totality k defektní demokracii. Prague: Slon.Google Scholar
  47. Kňapová, K. (2013). The coverage of the June 2011 transportation union strike on Czech television. Mediální Studia, 1, 93–107.Google Scholar
  48. Knox, P., & Pinch, S. (1982). Urban social geography: An introduction. Harlow: Pearson Education.Google Scholar
  49. Köhler, B., & Wissen, M. (2003). Glocalizing protest: Urban conflicts and the global social movements. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 27(4), 942–951.Google Scholar
  50. Kupka, P., & Mochťák, M. (2014). Aféra Nagygate mezi korupcí a organizovaným zločinem: Korupční sítě a jejich možný vliv na kvalitu demokracie v České republice. Středoevropské Politické Studie, 16(4), 237–263.Google Scholar
  51. Lefebvre, H. (1996 [1967]). Writing on cities. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar
  52. Leontidou, L. (2010). Urban social movements in ‘Weak’ civil societies: The right to the city and cosmopolitan activism in Southern Europe. Urban Studies, 47(6), 1179–1203.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Lux, M. (2004). Housing the poor in the Czech Republic: Prague, Brno and Ostrava. In J. Fearn (Ed.), Too poor to move, too poor to stay (pp. 23–66). Budapest: Local Government Initiative.Google Scholar
  54. Lux, M., & Mikeszová, M. (2012). Property restitution and private rental housing in transition: The case of the Czech Republic. Housing Studies, 27(1), 77–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Madden, D., & Marcouse, P. (2006). In Defense of Housing: The Politics of Crisis. London: Verso.Google Scholar
  56. Maier, K. (1998). Czech planning in transition: Assets and deficiencies. International Planning Studies, 3(3), 351–365.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Maier, K. (2003). Sídliště: problém a multikriteriální analýza jako součást přípravy k jeho řešení. Sociologický časopis/Czech Sociological Review, 39(5), 653–666.Google Scholar
  58. Maier, K. (2005). Czech housing estates: Recent changes and new challenges. In E. Nowosielska & J. J. Parysek (Eds.), Geographia polonica: Cities in the transforming post-communist countries: Ten years of economic, social and spatial experience (pp. 39–51). Warszawa: Institute of Geography and Spatial Organization, Polish Academy of Sciences.Google Scholar
  59. Mainwaring, S. (2003). Introduction: Democratic accountability in Latin America. In S. Mainwaring & C. Welna (Eds.), Democratic accountability in Latin America (pp. 3–33). Oxford: Oxford Studies in Democratization, Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Marcuse, P. (2009). From critical urban theory to the right to the city. City, 13(2–3), 185–197.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Massey, D. (1984). Spatial divisions of labour: Social structures and the geography of production. Basingstoke: Macmillan.Google Scholar
  62. Mayer, M. (2009). The ‘Right to the City’ in the context of shifting mottos of urban social movements. City, 12(2–3), 362–374.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. McAdam, D. (1999 [1982]). Political process and the development of black insurgency, 1930–1970. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  64. McAdam, D., McCarthy, J. D., & Zald, M. N. (1996). Comparative perspectives on social movements: Political opportunities, mobilizing structures, and cultural framings. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. McCann, E. J. (2002). Space, citizenship and the right to the city: A brief overview. GeoJournal, 58(2–3), 77–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Merrifield, A. (2014). The new urban question. London: Pluto Press.Google Scholar
  67. Mert, P., & Krčál, J. (2014). (Neo)liberální governmentalita v České republice. Brno: Václav Klement.Google Scholar
  68. Mitchell, D. (2003). The right to the city. New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
  69. Müller, K. (2005). Koncept občanské společnosti, lobbování a veřejný zájem. Příčiny, podoby a důsledky demokratického deficitu v České republice. Sociální Studia, 1, 111–128.Google Scholar
  70. Myant, M. (2006). Klaus, Havel and the debate over civil society in the Czech Republic. Journal of Communist Studies and Transition Politics, 21(2), 248–267. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Naxera, V. (2015). Corruption perception in the Czech Republic. The Journal of the Central European Political Science Association, 11(1), 51–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Novy, J., & Colomb, C. (2012). Struggling for the right to the (creative) city in Berlin and Hamburg: New Urban social movements, new ‘Spaces of Hope’? International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 37(5), 1816–1838.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Orcígr, V., Nakládal, J., & Zahumenská, V. (2018). Analýza bytové situace v Praze: Co stojí za krizí bydlení a jaká jsou řešení? Praha: Arnika.Google Scholar
  74. Pickvance, C. (1996). Environmental and housing movements in cities after socialism: The cases of Budapest and Moscow. In G. Andrusz, M. Harloe, & I. Szelényi (Eds.), Cities after socialism: Urban and regional conflict in post-socialist cities (pp. 232–267). Oxford: Blackwell.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. Pickvance, C. (2003). From urban social movements to urban movements: A review and introduction to a symposium on urban movements. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 27(1), 102–109.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. Piotrowski, G. (2011). Squatted social centers in Central and Eastern Europe. Warsaw: International Center for Research and Analysis (ICRA).Google Scholar
  77. Pixová, M. (2018). The empowering potential of reformist urban activism in Czech Cities. Voluntas: International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations, 29(4), 670–682.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. Pixová, M., & Novák, A. (2016). Prague post-1989: Boom, decline, and renaissance. Baltic Worlds, 2, 34–45.Google Scholar
  79. Pixová, M., & Sládek, J. (2016). Touristification and awakening civil society in post-socialist Prague. In C. Colomb & J. Novy (Eds.), Protest and resistance in the tourist city (pp. 73–89). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  80. Potůček, M. (2000). The uneasy birth of Czech civil society. Voluntas: International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations, 11(2), 107–121.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  81. Purcell, M. (2002). Excavating Lefebvre: The right to the city and its urban politics of the inhabitant. GeoJournal, 58(2–3), 99–108.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  82. Purcell, M. (2003). Citizenship and the right to the city: Reimagining the capitalist world order. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 27(3), 564–590.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  83. Purcell, M. (2009). Resisting neoliberalization: Communicative planning or counter-hegemonic movements? Planning Theory, 8(2), 140–165.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  84. Rancière, J. (1999). Disagreement: Politics and philosophy. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
  85. Rutland, T. (2012). Activists in the making: Urban movements, political processes and the creation of political subjects. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 37(3), 989–1011.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  86. Simpson, F. (1999). Tourist impact in the historic centre of Prague: Resident and visitor perceptions of the historic built environment. The Geographical Journal, 165(2), 173–183.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  87. Skalník, P. (2009). Political anthropology of the postcommunist Czech Republic: Local-national and rural-urban scenes. In L. Kürti & P. Skalník (Eds.), Postsocialist Europe anthropological perspectives from home (pp. 227–251). Oxford: Berghahn Book.Google Scholar
  88. Skovajsa, M. (2008). Independent and broader civil society in East-Central European democratizations. Taiwan Journal of Democracy, 4(2), 47–73.Google Scholar
  89. Smith, N. (1984). Uneven development: Nature, capital and the production of space. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
  90. Smith, N. (1996). The new urban frontier: Gentrification and the revanchist city. New York, NY: Routledge.Google Scholar
  91. Smith, N. (2002). New globalism, new urbanism: Gentrification as global urban strategy. Antipode, 34(3), 434–457.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  92. Snow, D. A., & Benford, R. D. (1988). Ideology, frame resonance, and participant mobilization. In B. Klandermans, H. Kriesi, & S. Tarrow (Eds.), From structure to action (pp. 197–218). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.Google Scholar
  93. Spilková, J., & Šefrna, L. (2010). Uncoordinated new retail development and its impact on land use and soils: A pilot study on the urban fringe of Prague, Czech Republic. Landscape and Urban Planning, 94(2), 141–148.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  94. Staggenborg, S., & Ramos, H. (2015). Social movements. Canada: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  95. Stanilov, K., & Sýkora, L. (Eds.). (2014). Confronting suburbanization: Urban decentralization in postsocialist Central and Eastern Europe. Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar
  96. Streeck, W. (2011). The crisis of democratic capitalism. New Left Review, 71, 5–29.Google Scholar
  97. Swyngedouw, E. (2009). The antinomies of the postpolitical city: In search of a democratic politics of environmental production. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 33(3), 601–620.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  98. Swyngedouw, E. (2011). Interrogating post-democratization: Reclaiming egalitarian political spaces. Political Geography, 30(7), 370–380.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  99. Swyngedouw, E., Moulaert, F., & Rodriguez, A. (2002). Neoliberal urbanization in Europe: Large-scale urban development projects and the new urban policy. Antipode, 34(3), 542–577.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  100. Sýkora, L. (2006). Urban development, policy and planning in the Czech Republic and Prague. In U. Altrock, S. Günter, S. Huning, & D. Peters (Eds.), Spatial planning and urban development in the new EU Member states: From adjustment to reinvention (pp. 113–140). Aldershot: Ashgate.Google Scholar
  101. Sýkora, L. (2009). New socio-spatial formations: Places of residential segregation in Czechia. Tijdschrift voor Economische en Sociale Geografie, 100(4), 417–435.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  102. Sýkora, L., & Bouzarovski, S. (2012). Multiple transformations: Conceptualising the post-communist urban transition. Urban Studies, 49(1), 43–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  103. Sýkora, L., & Ouředníček, M. (2007). Sprawling post-communist metropolis: Commercial and residential suburbanisation in Prague and Brno, the Czech Republic. In M. Dijst, E. Razin, & C. Vazquez (Eds.), Employment deconcentration in European metropolitan areas: Market forces versus planning regulations (pp. 209–233). Dordrecht: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  104. Tarrow, S. G. (1998). Power in movement: Social movements and contentious politics. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  105. Zarycki, T. (2014). Ideologies of Eastness in Central and Eastern Europe. Abingdon: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  106. zIndex. (2011). Press Release, Prague 26 January (ZIndex, the public procurement monitoring project, is led by John Chvalkovská, Petr Jansky and Goerge Skuhrovec, based at the Institute of Economics, Faculty of Social Sciences, Charles University, Czech Republic) (Innes 2013).Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  • Michaela Pixová
    • 1
  1. 1.Institute of Sociological StudiesCharles UniversityPragueCzech Republic

Personalised recommendations