Animating Frankenstein Lands: The Place of Landscape Art in Post-mining Lands

  • Penny DunstanEmail author


The created lands of rehabilitated post-mining landform must transition from mountains of overburden to a living ecosystem, but at what point can we claim rehabilitation success? I argue that it is when relations between the human and non-human worlds are reinstated and the newly created lands become loved and storied once again. Landscape art is uniquely positioned to bring land into relationship with people, to co-create stories of beginning and enact conversations about futures. Three Australian artists, who co-create with land are examined; Susan Purdy, John Wolseley and myself, Penny Dunstan. Collaborative landscape art embodies the unspeakable connections between land and people, finding the poetry that may animate our Frankenstein lands.


  1. Bolt, B. (2008). A performative paradigm for the creative arts. Working Papers in Art and Design, 5. Retrieved March 10, 2019, from
  2. Clewell, A. F., & Aronson, J. (2013). Ecological restoration: Principles, values, and structure of an emerging profession. Washington, DC: Island Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Haraway, D. (2011). Speculative fabulations for technoculture’s generations: Taking care of unexpected country. Australian Humanities Review Issue, 50(2011), 95–118.Google Scholar
  4. Instone, L. (2015). Walking as respectful wayfinding. In D. B. Rose, K. Gibson, & R. Fincher (Eds.), Manifesto for living in the anthropocene (pp. 133–138). Brooklyn, NY: Punctum.Google Scholar
  5. National Museum of Australia. (2016). Evidence of first peoples: At least 52,000 years ago: Archaeological evidence of first peoples on the Australian continent. Retrieved May 10, 2016, from
  6. NSW Mining Website: NSW Minerals Mine Rehabilitation Fact Sheet. (n.d.). Retrieved February 27, 2019, from
  7. Orchard, C. (2017). Epistemology, aesthetics and mediation: Photographic reflections on landscape change in regional Australia. In N. Holmes & S. Taffel (Eds.), Ecological entanglements in the anthropocene (ecocritical theory and practice) (pp. 143–158). London: Lexington Books.Google Scholar
  8. Pattenden, R. (2018, May–November). Altar/d – Art installation series, Adamstown Uniting Church. University of Newcastle Gallery. Retrieved from
  9. Plumwood, V. (2008). Shadow places and the politics of dwelling. Australian Humanities Review, 44, 139–150.Google Scholar
  10. Purdy, S. (2014). Susanpurdy.Net. Retrieved from Also see the Alternative Methods Photographic Seminar in Trentham Victoria run by Gold Street Studios.
  11. Rose, D. B. (2015). The ecological humanities. In D. B. Rose, K. Gibson, & R. Fincher (Eds.), Manifesto for living in the anthropocene (pp. 1–6). Brooklyn, NY: Punctum.Google Scholar
  12. Rose, D. B. (2016). Thinking like a Mantis? In Love at the edge of extinction, August 13. Retrieved from
  13. Wollstonecraft (Godwin) Shelley, M. (1818). Frankenstein; or, the modern prometheus, 1818. First Published 1823. Now Open Access.Google Scholar
  14. Wylie, J. (2007). Landscape. London and New York: Routledge.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.University of NewcastleCallaghanAustralia

Personalised recommendations