Advertisement

Introduction: Current Conflicts in Southeast Asia and Their Management in the Region’s Globalization

  • Mikio OishiEmail author
Chapter

Abstract

This introductory chapter provides the overall view of contemporary conflicts in Southeast Asia placed in the regional context of globalization. Three types of conflict in the region, that is, ethnic conflict, conflict over democracy, and cross-border environmental or resource conflict are identified as the objects of the investigation of the book, and it is discussed in general terms how the globalization of Southeast Asia impacts each type of conflict and its management. The chapter then introduces the conceptual framework of this book, consisting of the concepts of incompatibility management and mediation regime. With this framework, the conflicts in Southeast Asia chosen for this book and their management are to be analysed in the following chapters. Also discussed is another concept of good governance, which is to be employed to assess the performance of mediation regimes that are envisaged to manage the incompatibilities of respective conflicts.

Keywords

Conflict Southeast Asia Globalization Incompatibilities Incompatibility management Mediation regime Good governance 

References

  1. Anderson, B. (2006). Imagined communities: Reflections on the origin and spread of nationalism (Rev. ed.). London and New York: Verso.Google Scholar
  2. ASEAN Secretariat. (2012). Joint press statement special ASEAN foreign ministers meeting to issue The Declaration of Zone of Peace, Freedom And Neutrality Kuala Lumpur, 25–26 November 1971. http://asean.org/?static_post=joint-press-statement-special-asean-foreign-ministers-meeting-to-issue-the-declaration-of-zone-of-peace-freedom-and-neutrality-kuala-lumpur-25-26-november-1971. Accessed 4 Jan 2018.
  3. Askandar, K., Bercovitch, J., & Oishi, M. (2002). The ASEAN way of conflict management: Old patterns and new trends. Asian Journal of Political Science, 10(2), 21–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Ayoob, M. (1991). The security problematic of the third world. World Politics, 43(2), 257–283.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Baikoeni, E. Y., & Oishi, M. (2016). Ending a long-standing intrastate conflict through internationalisation: The case of Aceh in Indonesia. In M. Oishi (Ed.), Contemporary conflict in Southeast Asia: Towards a new ASEAN way of conflict management (pp. 19–44). Singapore: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bennis, W. G., Benne, K. D., & Chin, R. (1984). The planning of change (4th ed.). London: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.Google Scholar
  7. Bercovitch, J., & Oishi, M. (2010). International conflict in the Asia-Pacific: Patterns, consequences and management. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  8. Bigman, D. (2007). Globalization and the least developed countries: Potentials & pitfalls. Wallingford: CABI.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Caballero-Anthony, M. (2005). Regional security in Southeast Asia: Beyond the ASEAN way. Singapore: Institute of Southeast Asian Studies.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Davies, G., & Nyland, C. (2004). Views of globalization, empire and Asia: An introduction. In G. Davis & C. Nyland (Eds.), Globalization in the Asian region: Impacts and consequences (pp. 1–16). Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
  11. Druce, S. C. (2016). Not the “ASEAN Way”: The southern Philippines conflict and its internationalization. In M. Oishi (Ed.), Contemporary conflict in Southeast Asia: Towards a new ASEAN way of conflict management (pp. 45–60). Singapore: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. ESCAP. (2009). What is good governance? United Nations Economic and Social Commission for Asia and the Pacific. http://www.unescap.org/resources/what-good-governance. Accessed 15 Dec 2017.
  13. Fiorino, D. J. (2001). Environmental policy as learning: A new view of an old landscape. Public Administration Review, 61(3), 322–334.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Fisher, R., & Ury, W. (1981). Getting to yes. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.Google Scholar
  15. Hasenclever, A., Mayer, P., & Rittberger, V. (1997). Theories of international regimes. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. He, K. (2008). Institutional balancing and international relations theory: Economic interdependence and balance of power strategies in Southeast Asia. European Journal of International Relations, 14(3), 379–404.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Hegre, H., Gissinger, R., & Gleditsch, N. P. (2002). Globalization and internal conflict. A paper presented to a conference on “Polarization and conflict”, Barcelona, 15–16 December 2002.Google Scholar
  18. Kausikan, B. (2016). Bilahari Kausikan’s speech on ASEAN & US-China competition in Southeast Asia. 3rd IPS-Nathan Lecture, March 30. http://www.todayonline.com/print/1988361. Accessed 12 Apr 2016.
  19. Krasner, S. D. (1983). Structural causes and regime consequences: Regimes as intervening variables. In S. D. Krasner (Ed.), International regimes (pp. 1–22). Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
  20. Kratochwil, F. V., & Ruggie, J. G. (1986). International organization: A state of the art on an art of the state. International Organization, 40(4), 753–775.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Laue, J. H. (1990). The emergence and institutionalization of third-party roles in conflict. In J. Burton & F. Dukes (Eds.), Conflict: Readings in management and resolution (pp. 256–272). London: Macmillan.Google Scholar
  22. Lopez-Gonzalez, J., & Kowalski, P. (2015). Global value chain participation in Southeast Asia: Trade and related policy implications (ERIA discussion paper series). Jakarta: Economic Research Institute for ASEAN and East Asia.Google Scholar
  23. Mak, J. N. (2009). Sovereignty in ASEAN and the problem of maritime cooperation in the South China Sea. In S. Bateman & R. Emmers (Eds.), Security and international politics in the South China Sea: Towards a cooperative management regime (pp. 110–127). London/New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  24. Miall, H. (2004). Conflict transformation: A multi-dimensional task. Berlin: Berghof Research Center for Constructive Conflict Management.Google Scholar
  25. OECD. (2018). Economic outlook for Southeast Asia, China and India 2019: Towards smart urban transportation. Paris: OECD Publishing. https://www.oecd.org/development/asia-pacific/01_SAEO2019_Overview_WEB.pdf. Accessed 15 Feb 2019.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Oishi, M. (2011). Managing conflict in economic development: Southeast Asian experiences. Saarbrücken: LAP LAMBERT Academic Publishing.Google Scholar
  27. Oishi, M. (2016). Introduction: The ASEAN way of conflict management under challenge. In M. Oishi (Ed.), Contemporary conflict in Southeast Asia: Towards a new ASEAN way of conflict management (pp. 1–17). Singapore: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Oishi, M. (2017). Absorbing external shocks: ASEAN’s approach to regional stability (Working paper No. 34, 2017). Institute of Asian Studies, Universiti Brunei Darussalam. http://ias.ubd.edu.bn/assets/Files/WORKING.PAPER.SERIES.34.pdf. Accessed 15 Dec 2017.
  29. Oishi, M., & Ghani, N. (2016). Developing a way to influence the conduct of the government in intrastate conflict: The case of Myanmar. In M. Oishi (Ed.), Contemporary conflict in Southeast Asia: Towards a new ASEAN way of conflict management (pp. 89–110). Singapore: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Quang, N. M., & Oishi, M. (2016). Spiralling insurgency in the Deep South: Thailand’s unseen road to ethnic conflict management. In M. Oishi (Ed.), Contemporary conflict in Southeast Asia: Towards a new ASEAN way of conflict management (pp. 61–87). Singapore: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Ramsbotham, O., Woodhouse, T., & Miall, H. (2011). Contemporary conflict resolution (3rd ed.). Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
  32. Sivaraman, M. R. (2014). Governance and development. In C. S. Ramanathan & S. Dutta (Eds.), Governance, development, and social work (pp. 105–128). London/New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  33. Smith, A. (1981). The ethnic revival. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  34. Thakur, R., & Van Langenhove, L. (2008). Enhancing global governance through regional integration). In A. Cooper, C. Hughes, & P. De Lombaerde (Eds.), Regionalization and global governance: The taming of globalisations? (pp. 17–42). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  35. Weiss, T. G. (2013). Global governance: Why? what? whither? Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Universiti Malaysia SabahKota KinabaluMalaysia

Personalised recommendations