Advertisement

Socioeconomic Vulnerability Assessment: A Case Study of Flood Prone Urban Communities of Pakistan

  • Irfan Ahmad RanaEmail author
  • Jayant K. Routray
Conference paper
Part of the Disaster Risk Reduction book series (DRR)

Abstract

Urban flooding has become a regular phenomenon in many cities in the developing countries over the past years. Pakistan is also facing severe urban flooding in recent years. Socioeconomic vulnerability is essential for reducing disaster risk. The main objective of this study is to assess the socioeconomic vulnerability of flood prone urban areas of Pakistan. Based on high flood risk zones classification by National Disaster Management Authority of Pakistan, three urban centres with different population size (metropolitan, medium city and town) were chosen as a case study. Household survey was conducted, and indices were developed for using on well-defined indicators. A sample size of 210 were collected. The methodology for socioeconomic vulnerability assessment was tested and found operational. The households from medium town were found to be more vulnerable as compared to other two communities. This method can be replicated irrespective of spatial scales, and can be modified for other disasters by streamlining hazard specific indicators.

Keywords

Socioeconomic vulnerability Flood Urban Pakistan Disaster risk reduction 

References

  1. Adelekan IO (2011) Vulnerability assessment of an urban flood in Nigeria: Abeokuta flood 2007. Nat Hazards 56:215–231.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-010-9564-zCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Adger W (1999) Social vulnerability to climate change and extremes in coastal Vietnam. World Dev 27:249–269.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0305-750X(98)00136-3CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Adger WN (2006) Vulnerability. Glob Environ Chang 16:268–281.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2006.02.006CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Ahsan MN, Warner J (2014) The socioeconomic vulnerability index: a pragmatic approach for assessing climate change led risks-A case study in the south-western coastal Bangladesh. Int J Disaster Risk Reduct 8:32–49.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijdrr.2013.12.009CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Armaş I (2012) Multi-criteria vulnerability analysis to earthquake hazard of Bucharest, Romania. Nat Hazards 63:1129–1156.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-012-0209-2CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Balica SF, Douben N, Wright NG (2009) Flood vulnerability indices at varying spatial scales. Water Sci Technol 60:2571.  https://doi.org/10.2166/wst.2009.183CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Birkmann J, Cardona OD, Carreño ML et al (2013) Framing vulnerability, risk and societal responses: the MOVE framework. Nat Hazards 67:193–211.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-013-0558-5CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Briguglio L (1995) Small island developing states and their economic vulnerabilities. World Dev 23:1615–1632.  https://doi.org/10.1016/0305-750X(95)00065-KCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Chadha RK, Papadopoulos GA, Karanci AN (2007) Disasters due to natural hazards. Nat Hazards 40:501–502.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-006-9010-4CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Chakraborty J, Tobin GA, Montz BE (2005) Population evacuation: assessing spatial variability in geophysical risk and social vulnerability to natural hazards. Nat Hazards Rev 6:23–33.  https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1527-6988(2005)6:1(23)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Cochran W (1977) Sampling techniques, 3rd edn. John Wiley and Sons, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  12. Cutter SL, Boruff BJ, Shirley WL (2003) Social vulnerability to environmental hazards. Soc Sci Q 84:242–261.  https://doi.org/10.1111/1540-6237.8402002CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Federal Flood Commission (2012) Annual Flood Report 2012. IslamabadGoogle Scholar
  14. Flanagan BE, Gregory EW, Hallisey EJ et al (2011) A social vulnerability index for disaster management. J Homel Secur Emerg Manag 8:1–22.  https://doi.org/10.2202/1547-7355.1792CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Fuchs S, Birkmann J, Glade T (2012) Vulnerability assessment in natural hazard and risk analysis: current approaches and future challenges. Nat Hazards 64:1969–1975.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-012-0352-9CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Hahn MB, Riederer AM, Foster SO (2009) The livelihood vulnerability index: a pragmatic approach to assessing risks from climate variability and change-a case study in Mozambique. Glob Environ Chang 19:74–88.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2008.11.002CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. IPCC (2012) Managing the risks of extreme events and disasters to advance climate change adaptation: special report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, Field. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, C.BGoogle Scholar
  18. Jamshed A, Rana IA, Birkmann J, Nadeem O (2017) Changes in vulnerability and response capacities of rural communities after extreme events: case of major floods of 2010 and 2014 in Pakistan. J Extrem Events 04:1750013.  https://doi.org/10.1142/S2345737617500130CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Khan S (2012) Vulnerability assessments and their planning implications: a case study of the Hutt Valley, New Zealand. Nat Hazards 64:1587–1607.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-012-0327-xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Kirsch TD, Wadhwani C, Sauer L et al (2012) Impact of the 2010 Pakistan floods on rural and urban populations at six months. PLoS Curr.  https://doi.org/10.1371/4fdfb212d2432CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Mustafa D (2008) Structural causes of vulnerability to flood hazard in Pakistan. Econ Geogr 74:289–305.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1944-8287.1998.tb00117.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Pelling M (2003) Tracing the roots of urban risk and vulnerability. In: The vulnerability of cities: natural disasters and social resilience. Earthscan, LondonGoogle Scholar
  23. Phung D, Rutherford S, Dwirahmadi F et al (2016) The spatial distribution of vulnerability to the health impacts of flooding in the Mekong Delta. Vietnam. Int J Biometeorol 60:857–865.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00484-015-1078-7CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Punjab Bureau of Statistics (2014) Punjab Development Statistics 2014. LahoreGoogle Scholar
  25. Rana IA, Routray JK (2016) Actual vis-à-vis perceived risk of flood prone urban communities in Pakistan. Int J Disaster Risk Reduct 19:366–378.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijdrr.2016.08.028CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Rana IA, Routray JK (2018) Integrated methodology for flood risk assessment and application in urban communities of Pakistan. Nat Hazards 91:239–266.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-017-3124-8CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Rygel L, O’sullivan D, Yarnal B (2006) A method for constructing a social vulnerability index: an application to hurricane storm surges in a developed country. Mitig Adapt Strateg Glob Chang 11:741–764.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11027-006-0265-6CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Shah AA, Ye J, Abid M et al (2018) Flood hazards: household vulnerability and resilience in disaster-prone districts of Khyber Pakhtunkhwa province. Pakistan. Nat Hazards 1–19:147–165.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-018-3293-0CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Su S, Pi J, Wan C et al (2015) Categorizing social vulnerability patterns in Chinese coastal cities. Ocean Coast Manag 116:1–8.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ocecoaman.2015.06.026CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. UNISDR (2004) Living with risk: a global review of disaster reduction initiatives. UNISDR, GenevaGoogle Scholar
  31. UNISDR (2009) UNISDR terminology on disaster risk reduction. GenevaGoogle Scholar
  32. Willroth P, Revilla Diez J, Arunotai N (2011) Modelling the economic vulnerability of households in the Phang-Nga Province (Thailand) to natural disasters. Nat Hazards 58:753–769.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-010-9635-1CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Wisner B, Blaikie P, Cannon T, Davis I (2004) At risk: natural hazards, people’s vulnerability and disasters, 2nd edn. Routledge, LondonGoogle Scholar
  34. Yoon DK (2012) Assessment of social vulnerability to natural disasters: a comparative study. Nat Hazards 63:823–843.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-012-0189-2CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Urban and Regional Planning (URP), School of Civil and Environmental Engineering (SCEE)National University of Sciences and Technology (NUST)IslamabadPakistan

Personalised recommendations