Advertisement

Integrating Flood Education Miniature and Interactive E-Learning in a Prototype of Flood Learning Kit for Knowledge Resilience Among School Children

  • Vivien HowEmail author
  • Ezza Sabrina Binti Azmi
  • Nur Farihah Binti Mohd Zaki
  • Khairuddin Bin Othman
Conference paper
Part of the Disaster Risk Reduction book series (DRR)

Abstract

Children are highly vulnerable to climate change and disaster impacts, while those living in marginal environments and situations of poverty are the most vulnerable. Schools that are supposed to create a safe learning environment for students have become a vulnerable place when hit by flood during school hours. Children would be in danger if facing with a flood situation without parents or adults with them to help and lacking in the knowledge and preparation in response toward flood disaster. This paper discusses the potential of developing a personalized child-focused and child-led disaster risk reduction educational approaches and techniques. This was done by intervening the customized flood education miniature and interactive e-learning into a disaster educational module to evaluate the school children’s flood preparedness knowledge levels. A quasi-experimental study was carried out among 110 schoolchildren whose school and house are located at the flood-prone areas. The prototype learning kit was integrated with both (hardware) miniatures learning kit and (software) interactive e-learning modules to provide a low-cost, portable and interactive hands-on learning platform to the treatment group, whereas the control group was not provided with any learning platform. This prototype is designed by integrating four sub-elements: (i) general flood knowledge, (ii) flood warning, (iii) assemble flood preparedness kit, (iv) readiness of response to flood. The result of this study shows that there is no significant difference in the baseline knowledge level on flood preparedness between treatment and control group during the pre-intervention program. Following the intervention program, the pretesting score of the treatment group was adjusted, the (i) “general flood knowledge” shows no significant effect of the prototype learning kit to the treatment group (p = 0.270). However, “flood warning” (p < 0.001), “assemble flood preparedness kit” (p < 0.001) and “readiness of response to flood” (p < 0.031) show a significant increase in knowledge level after introducing the learning kit to the treatment group. Since school has a tangible role in building a resilience community, it is recommended to initiate the disaster education at school with the flood learning kit that encourages interactive problem-based learning with imaginary simulations of different case scenarios to facilitate knowledge transfer. In conclusion, this study showed that it is positive to integrate knowledge, innovation and education into personalized disaster risk learning approach to initiate a culture of disaster resilience and enhance risk awareness among school children.

Keywords

Knowledge transfer Flood preparedness Learning kit School children 

Notes

Acknowledgements

We would like to thank the Ministry of Education, Malaysia for supporting this research. Most of all, we would like to thank all of the elementary schools involved in this study, as well as teachers and parents who encourage the schoolchildren for participating in this study.

References

  1. Ahern M, Kovats RS, Wilkinson P et al (2005) Global health impacts of floods: epidemiologic evidence. Epidemiol Rev 27(1):36–46CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Avianto A, Deanne KB, Kevin R, Katharine H, Briony T (2017) Disaster risk reduction education in Indonesia: challenges and recommendations for scaling up. Nat Hazards Earth Syst Sci 17:595–612CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Clerveaux V, Spence B, Katada T (2008) Using game technique as a strategy in promoting disaster awareness in Caribbean multicultural societies: the disaster awareness game. J Disaster Res 3(5):321–333CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Djordjevic B, Dworzecka M, Kinser J (2015) Active learning classroom effectiveness compared to traditional lecture. In: Innovations in teaching & learning conference, vol 7, no 1Google Scholar
  5. Erikson EH (1963) The Golden Rule and the cycle of life. In: White RW (ed), Bruner KF (Col) The study of lives: essays on personality in honor of Henry A. Murray. Atherton Press, New York, xxi, pp 412–428Google Scholar
  6. Hackathorn J, Solomon ED, Blankmeyer KL, Tennial RE, Garczynski AM (2011) Learning by doing: an empirical study of active teaching techniques. J Eff Learn 11(2):40–54Google Scholar
  7. Johnson VA, Ronan KR, Johnston DM, Peace R (2014) Evaluations of disaster education programs for children: a methodological review. Int J Disaster Risk Reduct 9:07–123CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Keim ME (2011) Preventing disasters: public health vulnerability reduction as a sustainable adaptation to climate change. Disaster Med Public Health Prep 5(02):140–148CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Kumar A, Kumar P, Basu SC (2001) Student perceptions of virtual education: an exploratory study. In: Proceedings of the 2001 information resources management association international conference, Toronto, Ontario, pp 400–403Google Scholar
  10. Lawshe C (1975) A quantitative approach to content validity. Pers Psychol 1:563–575CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Loo YY, Billa L, Singh A (2015) Effect of climate change on seasonal monsoon in Asia and its impact on the variability of monsoon rainfall in Southeast Asia. Geosci Front 6(6):817–823CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Mudavanhu C, Manyena SB, Collins AE et al (2015) Taking children’s voices in disaster risk reduction a step forward. Int J Disaster Risk Sci 6(3):67–281CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Mutch C (2014) The role of schools in disaster preparedness, response and recovery: what can we learn from the literature? Pastor Care Educ 32(1):5–22CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Muzenda-Mudavanhu C (2016) A review of children’s participation in disaster risk reduction. Jàmbá J Disaster Risk Stud 8(1)Google Scholar
  15. Rieber LP (1996) Seriously considering play: designing interactive learning environments based on the blending of micro worlds, simulations, and games. Educ Tech Res Dev 44(2):43–58CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Ronan KR (2014) Advances and continuing challenges towards HFA2 and post-2015: background chapter. Background paper prepared for the 2015 global assessment report on disaster risk reductionGoogle Scholar
  17. School Flood Safety Programme (SFSP) (2009) Flood risk preparedness and reduction. Teacher information booklet, 2nd edn, October 2009. Flood Emergency Management Strengthening Component 4—Mekong River Commission (MRC)’s Flood Management and Mitigation ProgramGoogle Scholar
  18. Shiwaku K, Shaw R (2007) Future perspective of school disaster education in Nepal. Disaster Prev Manage 16(4):576–587CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Tuladhar G, Yatabe R, Dahal RK, Bhandary NP (2014) Knowledge of disaster risk reduction among school students in Nepal. Geomatics Nat Hazards Risks 5(3):190–207CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Tung FW, Deng YS (2007) Increasing social presence of social actors in e-learning environments: effects of dynamic and static emoticons on children. Displays 28(4–5):174–180CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. UN Office for Disaster Risk Reduction (2007) Hyogo framework for action 2005–2015. Building the resilience of nations and communities to disasters, ISDR, Geneva. Viewed 22 Oct 2011, from http://www.unisdr.org/we/inform/publications/1037
  22. UNISDR (2005) Hyogo framework for action 2005–2015: building the resilience of nations and communities to disasters. UNISDR, GenevaGoogle Scholar
  23. UNISDR (2007) Towards a culture of prevention: disaster risk reduction begins at school - good practices and lesson learned. United Nations International Strategy for Disaster Reduction. Geneva, Switzerland, p 143Google Scholar
  24. UNISDR (2015) Sendai framework for disaster risk reduction 2015–2030, UNISDRGoogle Scholar
  25. United Nations (1994) Yokohama strategy and plan of action for a safer world: guidelines for natural disaster prevention, preparedness and mitigation. United Nations, Yokohama, JapanGoogle Scholar
  26. Zhou Z, Chang JSK, Pan J, Whittinghill D (2016) Alternate reality game for emergency response training: a review of research. J Interact Learn Res 27(1):77–95 (Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE), Chesapeake, VA)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  • Vivien How
    • 1
    Email author
  • Ezza Sabrina Binti Azmi
    • 1
  • Nur Farihah Binti Mohd Zaki
    • 1
  • Khairuddin Bin Othman
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of Environmental and Occupational Health, Faculty of Medicine and Health SciencesUniversiti Putra MalaysiaSerdangMalaysia
  2. 2.Department of Community Support and ServicesMalaysian First Aid SocietyKuala LumpurMalaysia

Personalised recommendations