Advertisement

Force and Thermal Variational Analysis by FE Approach on Dry Turning of Inconel 718

  • Bishal Das
  • Jibin T. Philip
  • Kore Mahesh
  • Basil KuriachenEmail author
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes on Multidisciplinary Industrial Engineering book series (LNMUINEN)

Abstract

In the present work, dry turning process of Inconel 718 was simulated using DEFORM software. The Johnson–Cook fracture model was implemented in the FEM platform to develop and to analyse the 2D turning process model. The existing dire needs to reduce environmental pollution, and production costs have forced the manufacturers to limit the use of cutting fluids. In view of the above, the process was simulated at dry machining condition to investigate the influence of the two critical input factors: cutting speed (at 125, 300 and 475 m/min) and feed rate (at 0.05, 0.10 and 0.15 mm/rev). The variational analysis of the predicted machining responses, viz. cutting force, feed force, workpiece and tool interfacial temperature showed an incremental trend with time and cutting speed, respectively. The temperature simulation results were in agreeable concordance with the experimental results, from existing literature, with a maximum error of only 3.38%.

Keywords

Dry turning Inconel 718 DEFORM FEM Simulation 

References

  1. 1.
    Hong, J.K., Park, J.H., Park, N.K., Eom, I.S., Kim, M.B., Kang, C.Y.: Microstructures and mechanical properties of Inconel 718 welds by CO2 laser welding. J. Mater. Process. Technol. 201(1–3), 515–520 (2008).  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2007.11.224CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Parida, A.K., Maity, K.: Effect of nose radius on forces, and process parameters in hot machining of Inconel 718 using finite element analysis. Eng. Sci. Technol. Int. J. 20(2), 687–693 (2017).  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jestch.2016.10.006CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Ramanujam, R., Venkatesan, K., Saxena, V., Joseph, P.: Modeling and optimization of cutting parameters in dry turning of Inconel 718 using coated Carbide Inserts. Procedia Mater. Sci. 5, 2550–2559 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Coelho, R.T., Silva, L.R., Braghini Jr., A., Bezerra, A.A.: Some effects of cutting edge preparation and geometric modifications when turning INCONEL 718™ at high cutting speeds. J. Mater. Process. Technol. 148(1), 147–153 (2004).  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2004.02.001CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Xue, C., Chen, W.: Adhering layer formation and its effect on the wear of coated carbide tools during turning of a nickel-based alloy. Wear 270(11–12), 895–902 (2011).  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wear.2011.02.018CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Pawade, R.S., Joshi, S.S.: Multi-objective optimization of surface roughness and cutting forces in high-speed turning of Inconel 718 using Taguchi grey relational analysis (TGRA). Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol. 56(1–4), 47–62 (2011).  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-011-3183-zCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Kitagawa, T., Kubo, A., Maekawa, K.: Temperature and wear of cutting tools in high-speed machining of Inconel 718 and Ti6Al6V2Sn. Wear 202(2), 142–148 (1997).  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0043-1648(96)07255-9CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Dudzinski, D., Devillez, A., Moufki, A., Larrouquere, D., Zerrouki, V., Vigneau, J.: A review of developments towards dry and high-speed machining of Inconel 718 alloy. Int. J. Mach. Tools Manuf 44(4), 439–456 (2004).  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0890-6955(03)00159-7CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Kumar, S.M., Reddy, S.R., Vasu, V.: A 3D simulation and experimental study of cutting forces in turning of Inconel 718, ICEMS 2016 (2017)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Coroni, D.A., Croitoru, S.M.: Prediction of cutting forces at 2D titanium machining. Procedia Eng. 69, 81–89 (2014).  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proeng.2014.02.206CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Reddy, S.R., Kumar, M.S., Vasu, V.: Temperature study in turning Inconel-718: 3D simulation and experimentation. Mater. Today: Proc. 4(9), 9946–9950 (2017).  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matpr.2017.06.299CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Uhlmann, E., von der Schulenburg, M.G., Zettier, R.: Finite element modeling and cutting simulation of Inconel 718. CIRP Ann. Manuf. Technol. 56(1), 61–64 (2007).  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cirp.2007.05.017CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Pathak, B.N., Sahoo, K.L., Mishra, M.: Effect of machining parameters on cutting forces and surface roughness in Al-(1-2) Fe-1V-1Si alloys. Mater. Manuf. Processes 28(4), 463–469 (2013).  https://doi.org/10.1080/10426914.2013.763952CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Mechanical EngineeringNational Institute of Technology MizoramAizawlIndia

Personalised recommendations