Finite Element Analysis of Sheet Thickness and Force Variation in AA6063 During Single Point Incremental Forming

  • Saurabh Rai
  • Hreetabh Kishore
  • Harish Kumar Nirala
  • Anupam AgrawalEmail author
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes on Multidisciplinary Industrial Engineering book series (LNMUINEN)


The single point incremental forming (SPIF) using aluminum alloy-based sheets is widely used in automobile and aerospace industries due to its high strength to weight ratio. SPIF is one of the evolving manufacturing processes due to its potential for die-less forming of metallic sheets. The maximum allowable formability of AA-6063 is limited to the elongation ranging from 12 to 30%. This process generally uses hemispherical end-shaped forming tool which traces the generated CNC code path to acquire the desired shape. In this study, a conical geometry is formed through experiments and simulations using SPIF. This study presents a comparative finite element analysis (FEA) between implicit- and explicit-based computational techniques for SPIF using Abaqus®. In this study, output responses include sheet thickness variation, Von-Mises stress distribution, fracture limit curve and solver time for each computational method. Implicit computational method proves its advantages over explicit for accuracy.


SPIF FEA Tool path Explicit and implicit computational method ABAQUS 


  1. 1.
    Martins, P.A.F., Bay, N., Skjoedt, M., Silva, M.B.: Theory of single point incremental forming. CIRP Ann. Manuf. Technol. 57(1), 247–252 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Karbowski, K.: Application of incremental sheet forming. Manag. Prod. Eng. Rev. 6(4), 55–59 (2015)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Singh, A., Agrawal, A.: Experimental and numerical investigations on structural thinning, thinning evolution and compensation stratagem in deformation machining stretching mode. J. Manuf. Process. 26, 216–225 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Dixit, P.M., Dixit, U.S.: Plasticity Fundamentals and Application. CRC Press, Taylor and Francis Group, London (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Jeswiet, J., Micari, F., Hirt, G., Bramley, A., Duflou, J., Allwood, J.: Asymmetric single point incremental forming of sheet metal. Ann. CIRP 54(2), 623–650 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Filice, L., Fratini, L., Micari, F.: Analysis of material formability in incremental forming. CIRP Ann. Manuf. Technol. 51(1), 199–202 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Allwood, J.M., Shouler, D.R., Tekkaya, A.E.: The increased forming limits of incremental sheet forming processes. Key Eng. Mater. 344, 621–628 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
  9. 9.
    Pandit, D., Srinivasan, S.M.: An incremental approach for spring back analysis of elasto-plastic beam undergoing contact driven large deflection. Int. J. Mater. Sci. 115–116, 24–33 (2016)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Nirala Harish, K., Agrawal, A.: Sheet thinning prediction and calculation in incremental sheet forming. Sheet Thinning Prediction and Calculation in Incremental Sheet Forming by S. S. Pande, U. S. Dixit, Precision Product-Process Design and Optimization. Lecture Notes on Multidisciplinary Industrial Engineering, pp. 391–410. Springer, Singapore (2018)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Mechanical EngineeringIndian Institute of Technology RoparRupnagarIndia

Personalised recommendations