Advertisement

Investigation on Surface Roughness During Finishing of Al-6061 Hybrid Composites Tube with Traces of Rare Earth Metals Using Magnetic Abrasive Flow Machining

  • V. K. SharmaEmail author
  • V. Kumar
  • R. S. Joshi
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes on Multidisciplinary Industrial Engineering book series (LNMUINEN)

Abstract

This paper studies the effect of magnetic abrasive flow machining process on internal finishing of the Al-6061-based hybrid composites tubes reinforced with SiC, Al2O3, and rare earth particulates. The characteristics of internal finishing for getting a mirror-like surface are influenced by the nature of magnetic abrasive particles. A novel systematic methodology to identify the optimal MAF process parameters is presented in present work. Moreover, effects of process parameters, namely, extrusion pressure and number of cycles on surface roughness, have also been investigated. An experimental study was carried out on Al-6061 hybrid composites containing wt% of SiC and Al2O3 from 5 to 15% and CeO2 from 0.5 to 2.0%. The results obtained from the roughness profile curve shows that at extrusion pressure of 20.68 bar least percentage improvement in surface roughness occurred whereas, at 48.26 bar, maximum improvement in surface roughness occurred with the use of magnetic field intensity.

Keywords

Magnetic Abrasive flow Machining Box–Behnken Design Finishing 

References

  1. 1.
    Jain, V.K., Singh, D.K., Raghuram, V.: Analysis of performance of pulsating flexible magnetic abrasive brush (P-Fmab). Mach. Sci. Technol. 12(1), 53–76 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Yin, S., Shinmura, T.: A comparative study: polishing characteristics and its mechanisms of three vibration modes in vibration-assisted magnetic abrasive polishing. Int. J. Mach. Tools Manuf. 44(4), 383–390 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Mulik, R.S., Pandey, P.M.: Ultrasonic assisted magnetic abrasive finishing of hardened AISI 52100 steel using unbonded SiC abrasives. Int. J. Refract. Met. Hard Mater. 29(1), 68–77 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Mulik, R.S., Pandey, P.M.: Experimental investigations and modeling of finishing force and torque in ultrasonic assisted magnetic abrasive finishing. J. Manuf. Sci. Engm. ASME 5(134), 1–12 (2012)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Singh, S., Shan, H.S., Kumar, P.: Wear behavior of materials in magnetically assisted abrasive flow machining. J. Mater. Process. Technol. 128, 155–161 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Kala, P., Pandey, P.: Comparison of finishing characteristics of two paramagnetic materials using double disc magnetic abrasive finishing. J. Manuf. Process. 17, 63–77 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Ko, S.L., Baron, Y.U., Park, J.I.: Micro Deburring for precision parts using magnetic abrasive finishing method. J. Mater. Process. Technol. 187, 19–25 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Zou, Y.H., Jiao, A.Y., Aizawa, T.: Study on plane magnetic abrasive finishing process-experimental and theoretical analysis on polishing trajectory. Adv. Mater. Res. 126, 1023–1028 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Yamaguchi, H., Shinmura, T., Ikeda, R.: Study of internal finishing of austenitic stainless steel capillary tubes by magnetic abrasive finishing. J. Manuf. Sci. Eng. 129(5), 885–892 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Mechanical EngineeringThapar Institute of Engineering & TechnologyPatialaIndia
  2. 2.Department of Mechanical EngineeringFaculty of Meerut Institute of Engineering & TechnologyMeerutIndia

Personalised recommendations