Mechanical Characterization and Process Optimization of PolyJet 3D Printing Using Digital ABS with Different Part Geometries

  • B. N. Sontakke
  • B. B. AhujaEmail author
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes on Multidisciplinary Industrial Engineering book series (LNMUINEN)


Last few decades have seen a rapid growth in additive manufacturing (AM) owing to its adaptability to new manufacturing requirement and trends. In PolyJet technology, a popular method in AM, parts are manufactured by depositing layer upon layer and, simultaneously, each layer is cured using ultraviolet energy. This process exhibits the structured approach of layered manufacturing process which produces state-of-the-art products with superior quality. The process has shown promising technological development in the field of design and manufacturing. This work aims at improving the performance characteristic and process optimization through the application of design of experiment approach. The response parameters viz. the storage modulus, loss modulus, loss factor, glass transition temperature, and surface roughness have been individually assessed. The statistical technique has been used to study the effect of process parameters and their significance. Gray relation grade analysis has been used for process optimization.


Additive manufacturing PolyJet Design of experiment Dynamic mechanical analyzer Surface roughness 


  1. 1.
    Wohlers, T.: Wohlers Report—Annual Worldwide Progress Report—Additive Manufacturing and 3D Printing State of the Industry. Wohlers Associates (2014)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Santos, E.C., Shiomi, M., Osakadaa, K., Laoui, T.: Rapid manufacturing of metal components by laser forming. Int. J. Mach. Tools Manuf. 46, 1459–1468 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Mellor, S., Hao, L., Zhang, D.: Additive manufacturing: a framework for implementation. Int. J. Prod. Econ. 149, 194–201 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Clemon, L., Sudradjat, A., Jaquez, M., Krishna, A., Rammah, M., Dornfeld, D.: Precision and energy usage for additive manufacturing, volume 2A: advanced manufacturing. USA: ASME International Mechanical Engineering Congress and Exposition, San Diego, California(2013)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Gibson, I., Rosen, D. W., Stucker, B.: Additive manufacturing technologies—rapid prototyping to direct digital manufacturing. Springer (2010)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Dimitrov, D., van Wijck, W., Schreve, K., de Beer, N.: Investigating the achievable accuracy of three-dimensional printing. Rapid Prototyp. J. 12(1), 42–52 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Brajlih, T., Valentan, B., Balic, J., Drstvensek, I.: Speed and accuracy evaluation of additive manufacturing machines. Rapid Prototyp. J. 17(1), 64–75 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Anand, S., Ratnadeep, P.: Optimal part orientation in Rapid Manufacturing process for achieving geometric tolerances. J. Manuf. Syst. 30, 214–222 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Pham, D., Gault, R.: A comparison of rapid prototyping technologies. Int. J. Mach. Tools Manuf. 38, 1257–1287 (1998)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Production Engineering and Industrial ManagementCollege of Engineering PunePuneIndia

Personalised recommendations