Advertisement

Global Social Contract Theory

  • Takashi Inoguchi
  • Lien Thi Quynh Le
Chapter
Part of the Trust book series (TRUST, volume 3)

Abstract

This chapter describes the nature and potentials of Rousseau’s and Locke’s social contract theories to be reformulated as global social contract theory. Despite their limits attributed to the seventeenth and eighteenth century western Europe where they lived their lives like Rousseau’s geo-cultural exclusion of Mediterranean and eastern Europe and Locke’s socio-religious exclusion of those without status and piety, we summarize those subsequent democratic developments in Rosseauesque direct democracy driven by empathy and compassion and in Lockean representative democracy driven by human reasoning and pragmatism. Citing Immanuel Kant’s Eternal Peace in comparing the year of 1912 when Norman Angell expressed optimism on the basis of free trade-derived peace and prosperity and the year of 2019 when international organizations, democracy and free trade have reached their peaks and the beginnings of a stall.

References

  1. Abbott, K., & Snidal, D. (1998). Why states act through formal international organizations. Journal of Conflict Resolution, 42(1), 3–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Abbott, K., Genschel, P., Snidal, D., & Zangl, B. (Eds.). (2015). International organizations as orchestrators. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  3. Abbott, K., Green, J., & Keohane, R. (2016). Organizational ecology and institutional change in global governance. International Organization, 70(2), 247–277.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Achen, C., & Bartels, L. (2016). Democracy for realists: Why elections do not produce responsible government. Princeton: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Angell, N. (1912). The great illusion: A study of the relation of military power to national advantage, paperback edition. New York: Bottom of the Hill Publishing.Google Scholar
  6. Azuma, H. (2014). General Will 2.0: Rousseau, Freud, Google, New York: Vertical.Google Scholar
  7. Badie, B. (2000). The imported state: The westernization of the political order. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
  8. Barber, B. (2004). The death of communal liberty: A history of freedom in a Swiss Mountain Canton. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  9. Barber, B. (2014). If mayors ruled the world: dysfunctional nations, rising cities. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
  10. Budge, I. (1996). The new challenge of direct democracy. Cambridge: Polity.Google Scholar
  11. Dahl, R. (2006). A preface to democratic theory, expanded edition. New Haven: Yale University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Dalton, R., & Welzel, C. eds. (2015). The civic culture transformed: From allegiance to assertive citizens. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  13. Diderot, D., & le Rond d’Alembert, J. (1751–1772). Encyclopédie ou Dictionnaire Raisonné des Sciences, des Arts et des Métiers (Vol. 28). Sydney: Wentworth Press.Google Scholar
  14. Dunn, J. (2005). Setting the people free: The story of democracy. London: Atlantic Books.Google Scholar
  15. Farr, J., & Williams, D. L. (Eds.). (2015). The general will: The evolution of a concept. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  16. Fenno, R. (2002). Home style: House members in their districts. New York: Pearson; Longman Classics edition.Google Scholar
  17. Freud, S. (2010). The interpretation of dreams: The complete and definitive text. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
  18. Grigorescu, A., & Baser, C. (2019). The choice between intergovernmentalism and nongovernmentalism: Projecting domestic preferences to global governance. World Politics, 71(1), 88–125.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Habermas, J. (1991). The structural transformation of the public sphere: An inquiry into category of bourgeois society. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  20. Hobbes, T. (2014). Thomas Hobbes: Leviathan. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1st edition of Clarendon Edition of the Works of Thomas Hobbes.Google Scholar
  21. Inoguchi, T. (2017, January 27). Non-US and US citizens’ polling in US presidential election 2016: A hierarchical Bayesian model. In Paper prepared for the conference organized by Asian journal of comparative politics (SAGE publications). Tokyo: International House of Japan.Google Scholar
  22. Inoguchi, T., & Le, L. T. Q. (2016). Toward modelling a global social contract: Jean-Jacques Rousseau and John Locke. Japanese Journal of Political Science, 17(03), 489–522.  https://doi.org/10.1017/S1468109916000207.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Jain, P. (forthcoming). Asian subnational governance in foreign affairs. In T. Inoguchi (Ed.), The Sage handbook of Asian foreign policy, Vol. 1, Chapter 16. London: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
  24. Jesper, K. (2019). “Japan is back as a top global contender.” The Japan Times, Feb. 3.Google Scholar
  25. Johnston, H., & Almeida, P. (Eds.). (2006). Latin American social movements: Globalization, democratization, and transnational networks. New York: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers.Google Scholar
  26. Kant, I. (2013). Eternal peace and other internal essays. New York: The Classicus.us.Google Scholar
  27. Keane, J. (2009). The life and death of democracy. London: Simon and Schuster.Google Scholar
  28. Kriesi, H., Lavenex, S., Esser, F., Matthes, J., Bühlmann, M., & Bochsler, D. (2013). Democracy in the age of globalization and mediatization. Basingstoke, Hampshire: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Le, T. Q. L., Mikami, Y., & Inoguchi, T. (2014). Global leadership and international regime: Empirical testing of cooperation without hegemonic paradigm on the basis of 120 multilateral conventions deposited to the United Nations System. Japanese Journal of Political Science, 15(4), 523–601.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Locke, J. (1993). Two treaties of government. New York: Everyman Paperback.Google Scholar
  31. Mair, P. (2013). Ruling the void: The hollowing of Western democracy. London: Verso.Google Scholar
  32. Martin, S., Saafeld, T., & Strøm, K. (2016). The Oxford handbook of legislative studies. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  33. Mizuno, K. (2014). Shihonshugi no Shuen to Rekishino Kiki (The end of capitalism and the crisis of history). Tokyo: PHP Institute.Google Scholar
  34. Ockham, W., & Brown, S. (1990). Ockham-philosophical writings: A solution. New York: Hackett Publishing Company.Google Scholar
  35. Putnam, R. (2000). Making democracy work: Civic traditions in modern Italy. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  36. Redman, E., & Newstadt, R. (2001). The dance of legislation: An insider’s account of the workings of the United States Senate. Seattle: University of Washington Press.Google Scholar
  37. Rosanvallon, P. (2008). Counter-democracy: Politics in an age of distrust. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Rousseau, J.-J., & Cranston, M. (1968). The social contract. London: Penguin Classics.Google Scholar
  39. Russett, B. M., & Oneal, J. (2001). Triangulating peace: Democracy, interdependence, and international organizations. New York: Norton.Google Scholar
  40. Shkler, J. (1973). General will. In P. Wiener (Ed.), Dictionary of the history of ideas (p. 275). New York: Charles Scribner’s Sons.Google Scholar
  41. Tallberg, J., Sommerer, T., Squatrito, T., & Jonsson, C. (2013). The opening up of international organizations: Transnational access in global governance. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Tarrow, S. (2011). Power in movement: Social movements and contentious politics. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. The Economist. (2016a). “Caste in India: Backward ho!” February 27–March 4, pp. 21–22.Google Scholar
  44. The Economist. (2016b). “How to win friends and influence people” April 9–15, p. 18.Google Scholar
  45. Whitehead, L. (2002). Democratization: Theory and practice. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. WIN-Gallup International. (2016). Global poll on the American election: Region-wise results, demographics-wise results and U.S. results, Vienna: WIN-Gallup International.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  • Takashi Inoguchi
    • 1
  • Lien Thi Quynh Le
    • 2
  1. 1.Institute of Asian CulturesJ.F. Oberlin UniversityTokyoJapan
  2. 2.College of EconomicsHue UniversityHueVietnam

Personalised recommendations