Advertisement

Paradigm Shifts in the TFT-LCD Industry and Japan’s Competitive Position in East Asia

  • Kazuhiro AsakawaEmail author
Chapter

Abstract

This chapter analyzes Japan’s changing competitive position in the TFT-LCD industry over the past several decades. Based on the analysis of multiple factors that affected Japan’s decline, I identified paradigm shifts in the TFT-LCD industry that have directly or indirectly led to a change in Japan’s competitive position. The chapter shows that declining competitiveness of a country and a firm cannot be fully understood without closely relating it to the shifts in the paradigm of the industry. In addition, this chapter shows how the paradigm shifts of the industry, the changing competitive positions of a country and a firm, as well as the changing locus of innovation for a company, i.e. domestic vs. international and in-house versus collaborative, are aligned with one another.

Keywords

Paradigm shifts TFT-LCD industry Japan Competitive position Locus of innovation East Asia 

Notes

Acknowledgements

I would like to thank Stefanie Lenway and Thomas Murtha for their insights into the early stage of this research through our collaboration at Alfred P. Sloan Foundation Industry Studies Project. I thank RIETI for its generous support to conduct the early stage of this research. I also thank Keio Business School’s Mitsubishi Chairship Fund and the JSPS Grant-in-Aid (B) No. 15H03384 for the financial support.

References

  1. Akabane, J. (2004). The Taiwanese TFT-LCD industry: The role of Japanese companies and the Taiwanese government in the development process. Asian Studies, 50(4), 1–19 (in Japanese).Google Scholar
  2. Asakawa, K. (2007). Metanational learning in TFT-LCD industry: An organizing framework, RIETI Discussion Paper (07-E-029). Tokyo, Japan: Research Institute of Economy, Trade and Industry.Google Scholar
  3. Asakawa, K., & K. Kim (2007). Japan’s TFT-LCD Display Industry. Keio BusinessSchool Case #90-06-5225 (in Japanese).Google Scholar
  4. Asakawa, K., Park, Y., Song, J., & Kim, S. (2018). Internal embeddedness, geographic distance, and global knowledge sourcing by overseas subsidiaries. Journal of International Business Studies, 49(6), 743–752.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Cantwell, J., & Immarino, S. (2003). Multinational corporations and european regional systems of innovation. Oxfordshire: Routledge.Google Scholar
  6. Cantwell, J., & Mudambi, R. (2005). MNE competence-creating subsidiary mandates. Strategic Management Journal, 26(12), 1109–1128.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Doz, Y., Santos, J., & Williamson, P. (2001). From global to metanational. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.Google Scholar
  8. Everatt, D., Tsi, T., & Cheng, B. (1999). The Acer Group’s China manufacturing decision. Version A. Ivey Case Series #9 A99M009. Richard Ivey School of Business, University of Western Ontario.Google Scholar
  9. Hsieh, D. (2013, July 1). Sharp and CEC-Panda: The first Chinese-Japanese joint TFT LCD fab, rAVe Publications, online.Google Scholar
  10. Hsieh, D. (2016, March 31). HIS: Foxconn-sharp deal creates TFt-LCD production powerhouse, News Freedom, news online.Google Scholar
  11. Hu, M.-C. (2012). Technological innovation capabilities in the thin film transistor-liquid crystal display industries of Japan, Korea, and Taiwan. Research Policy, 41, 541–555.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. IHS Markit. (2018). Display market outlook for 2019, presentation by D. Hsieh at the Display Innovation China 2018, Beijing Summit.Google Scholar
  13. JB Press. (2018). Japanese firms are fighting a last-ditch battle in OLED falling behind the Korean (Kankokuzei ga senkousuru yuki-EL de nihonkigyou ga toru haisuinojin), in Japanese. Nikoniko News, 20180911, 06:00. JB press.Google Scholar
  14. Johnstone, B. (1999). We are buring: Japanese entrepreneurs and the forging of the electronic age. New York, NY: Basic Books.Google Scholar
  15. Kim, L. (1997). Immitation to innovation: The dynamics of korea’s technologial learning. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.Google Scholar
  16. Kojima, K. (2000). The “flying geese” model of Asian economic development: Origin, theoretical extensions, and regional policy implications. Journal of Asian Economics, 11(4), 375–401.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Lee, K. (2005). Making a technological catch-up: Opportunities and barriers. Asian Journal of Technology Innovation, 13(2), 97–131.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Lee, K., & Lim, C. (2001). Technological regimes, catching-up and leapfrogging: Findings from the Korean industries. Research Policy, 30(3), 459–483.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Lee, K., & Mathews, J. A. (2012). South Korea and Taiwan. In E. Amann & J. Cantwell (Eds.), Innovative firms in emerging market countries (pp. 223–245). Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Lehmberg, D. (2017). The process of industry exit in the Japanese context: Evidence from the flat panel display industry. Journal of Management & Organization, 23(1), 92–115.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Linden, G., Hart, J., Lenway, S., & Murtha, T. (1998). Flying geese as moving targets: Are Korea and Taiwan catching up with Japan in advanced displays? Industry and Innovation, 5(1), 11–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Mathews, J. A. (2005). Strategy and the crystal cycle. California Management Review, 47(2), 6–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Mathews, J. A. (2006). Catch-up strategies and the latecomer effect in industrial development. New Political Economy, 11(3), 313–336.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Mathews, J. A., & Lim, C. (2001). Technological regimes, catching-up and leapfrogging: Findings from the Korean industries. Research Policy, 30(3), 459–483.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Mathews, J. A., Hu, M. -C., & Wu, C. Y. (2011). Fast-follower industrial dynamics: The case of Taiwan’s emergent solar photovoltaic industry. Industry and Innovation, 18(2), 177–202.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Mudambi, R. (2017). Offshoring: Economic geography and the multinational firm. Journal of International Business Studies, 38(1), 206.Google Scholar
  27. Mudambi, R. (2018). Location, control and innovation in knowledge-intensive industries. Journal of Economic Geography, 8, 699–725.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Murtha, T., Lenway, S., & Hart, J. (2001). Managing new industry creation. Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
  29. Nakagawa, T., Kutsukake, T., & Nakashima, T. (2016). Materials industry under the radically changing competitive environment, (Kyosokankyou ga gekihensuru sozaisangyo), Chitekishisansouzou (Intellectual Asset Creation) February 2016), in Jpanese: 38–53.Google Scholar
  30. Nakata, Y. (2007). Japan’s competitiveness in TFT-LCD industry: Analysis on the decline and a proposal for core national management. RIETI DP (in Japanese).Google Scholar
  31. Nakata, Y. (2009). Inter-organizational knowledge creation from the aspect of industrial architecture: The analysis of competitive strategies from the cases of TFT-LCD, semiconductor, solar cells, and automobile industries. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Graduate School of Technology Management, Ritsumeikan University.Google Scholar
  32. Negishi, M. (2013). Sharp licenses advanced LD technology to its Chinese partner: The Japanese electronics maker will take a stake in a Nanjing factory. Wall Street Journal, June 27, 2013, 7:12 a.m. E.T.Google Scholar
  33. Nekar, A. (2003). Old is gold? The value of temporal exploration in the creation of new knowledge. Management Science, 49(2), 211–229.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Nikkei Shimbun. (2019a). The JDI negotiation reaching the finale (JDI Shien kosho odume), in Japanese. 3.31.Google Scholar
  35. Nikkei Shimbun. (2019b). JDI falling under the umbrella of the Chinese-Taiwanese group: The national TFT-LCD initiative came to a deadlock (JDI taichuzei sanka ni: hinomaruekishou ga tonza), in Japanese .4.4, p. 1.Google Scholar
  36. Nikkei Shimbun. (2019c). JDI falling under the umbrella of the Chinese-Taiwanese group: Complacency in TFT-LCD caused delay in its engagement in OLED (JDI taichuzei sanka ni: ekisho kashin yuki el deokure: ekishokashi yuki el dokure), in Japanese, April 4, p. 15.Google Scholar
  37. Nikkei Shimbun. (2019d, April 6). Samsung losing profit: Dark clouds looming over its counterattack (Samsung geneki: haakou ni kage), in Japanese, p. 10.Google Scholar
  38. Nikkei Business. (2016). Beyond the smile curve (sumairu kabu wo koero), in Japanese, Nikkei Business. 5.30: 38–39.Google Scholar
  39. Numagami, T. (1999). History of technological innovation in TFT-LCD display. In Japanese. Tokyo: Hakuto.Google Scholar
  40. Polgar, L. G. (2003). Flat panel displays. Business Economics, 38(4), 62–68.Google Scholar
  41. Shintaku, J., Kyo, K., & So, S. (2006). Development of Taiwanese TFT-LCD industry and corporate strategy. MMRC-J-84, Discussion Paper, The University of Tokyo.Google Scholar
  42. Shintaku, J., & Yoshimoto, T. (2009). TFT-LCD TV and panel industry: International division of labor. In J. Shintaku & H. Amano (Eds.), Global strategy of manufacturing management: Industrial geography in Asia (pp. 83–110). Tokyo: Yuhikaku.Google Scholar
  43. Semenza, P. (2012). The display industry: Fast to grow, slow to change. Information Display, 5&6(12), 18–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Song, J. (2006). Samsung and Korea’s Flat Panel Display industry, presentation at RIETI seminar, July 2006.Google Scholar
  45. Suarez, F., & Utterback, J. (1995). Dominant designs and the survival of firms. Strategic Management Journal, 16(6), 415–430.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Tabata, M. (2014). The rose of Taiwan in the TFT-LCD industry. Journal of Technology Management in China, 9(2), 190–205.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Graduate School of Business AdministrationKeio UniversityYokohamaJapan

Personalised recommendations