‘I Lived Through a Disaster’: Disaster Memories and Lived Experiences After the 2010 Leh Flash Floods

  • Shubhda AroraEmail author
Part of the Disaster Studies and Management book series (DSDM)


Dominant discourses in Indian disaster research have always focussed on studying disasters as an external and objective reality while ignoring the more subjective and experiential aspects of it. Majority studies have largely disregarded the exploration of lived experiences of disasters and the importance of memory and memorializing in rehabilitation work. However, disasters also have an ‘experiential’ reality, the memory of which creates a critical reflection of the past disaster for better preparedness in the present and for future disasters. Therefore, this paper turns its attention to the lived experiences of disaster affected individuals. Through a narrative ethnographic study in the district of Leh in 2013, three years after the disaster (flash floods), the paper argues that post-disaster experiences are socio-culturally shaped and that ‘certain memories’ allow for hope and better preparedness for a future disaster. An attempt has been made to examine post-disaster experiences to understand the role of various actors, spaces and narratives produced and reproduced in the context of relief and rehabilitation. The paper explores the varied kinds of memory works and memorializing practices adopted in a post-disaster context and the different temporal and spatial constructions of post-disaster memories. This gives insights into proposals for memory management and public commemoration of disasters. In conclusion, this paper is an anthropological study of disaster relief and rehabilitation which contributes to the understanding of social memory with respect to theories of risk, vulnerability and resilience.


  1. Alexander, C. J. (2004). Towards a theory of cultural trauma. In J. C. Alexander, R. Eyerman, et al. (Eds.), Cultural trauma and collective identity. California: UC Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Arora, S. (2018). Post-disaster memoryscapes: Communicating disaster risks and climate change after the Leh flash floods in 2010. Communication and the Public, 3(4), 310–321.
  3. Boano, C., Hunter, W. (2012). Architecture at risk (?): The ambivalent nature of post-disaster practice. Architectonica, 1(1), 1–13.Google Scholar
  4. Bruner, J. (1987). Life as narrative. Social Research, 54, 13–32.Google Scholar
  5. Chase, S. E. (1995). Taking narrative seriously: Consequences for method and theory in interview studies. In R. Josselson & A. Lieblich (Eds.), Interpreting experience: The narrative study of lives. California: Sage.Google Scholar
  6. Clandinin, D. J. (2007). Handbook of narrative inquiry: Mapping a methodology. Thousand Oaks: Sage.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Connelly, F. M., & Clandinin, D. J. (1990). Stories of experience and narrative inquiry. Educational Researcher, 19(5), 2–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Cutter, S. L. (1994). Environmental risks and hazards. New Jersey: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
  9. Cutter, S. L. (2005). Are we asking the right question? In R. W. Perry & E. L. Quarantelli (Eds.), What is a disaster? New answers to old questions. Philadelphia: Xlibris Corporation.Google Scholar
  10. Das, V. (1995). Critical events: An anthropological perspective on contemporary India. New Delhi: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  11. Denzin, N. K., & Lincoln, Y. S. (1994). Handbook of qualitative research. California: Sage.Google Scholar
  12. District Disaster Management Authority. (2011). Disaster management plan. Leh District: via Leh Deputy Commissioner Office. Accessed April 4, 2013.
  13. Dombrowsky, W. R. (1998). Again and again: Is a disaster what we call a ‘Disaster’? In E. L. Quarantelli (Ed.), What is a disaster? New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  14. Durkheim, É. (1912). Les formes élémentaires de la vie religieuse. English edition: Durkheim, É. (1915). The elementary forms of the religious life (Trans: Swain J). London: George Allen and Unwin.Google Scholar
  15. Erikson, K. T. (1994). A new species of trouble: The human experience of modern disasters. New York: W.W. Norton and Co.Google Scholar
  16. Fisher, W. (1987). Human communication as narration. Columbia: South Carolina University Press.Google Scholar
  17. Freeman, M. (1993). Rewriting the self: History, memory, narrative. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  18. Freeman, M. (2011). Stories, big and small: Toward a synthesis. Theory & Psychology, 21(1), 114–121.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Fritz, C. E. (1961). Disaster. In R. K. Merton & R. A. Nisbet (Eds.), Contemporary social problems. New York: Harcourt, Brace and World.Google Scholar
  20. Gregor, N. (2008). Haunted city: Nuremberg and the Nazi Past. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
  21. Heidegger, M. (1916). Der Zeitbegriff in der geschichtswissenschaft. Zeitschrift für Philosophie und philosophische Kritik (Vol. 161, pp. 173–188). [Heidegger, M. (1992). The concept of time (Trans: McNeill W)]. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
  22. Heidegger, M. (1927). Sein und Zeit [English edition: Heidegger, M. (1967). Being and Time, (Trans: Macquarrie J, Robinson E)]. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
  23. Hunt, J., Romero, P., & Good, J. (2006). Stories from the mobile workplace: An emerging narrative ethnography. In 18th Annual Psychology of Programming Interest Group (pp. 153–165).Google Scholar
  24. Kellet, P., & Moore, J. (2003). Routes to home: Homelessness and home-making in contrasting societies. Habitat International, 27(1), 123–141.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Kleinman, A. (1988). The illness narratives: Suffering, healing and the human condition. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
  26. Makkreel, R. A., Rodi, F. (2002). Wilhelm Dilthey: Selected works. The formation of the historical world in the human sciences Vol. 3. New Jersey: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  27. Mooney, E. (2005). The concept of internal displacement and the case for internally displaced persons as a category of concern. Refugee Survey Quarterly, 24(3), 9–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Noy, C. (2007). A narrative community: Voices of Israeli backpackers. Detroit: Wayne State University Press.Google Scholar
  29. Oliver-Smith, A., & Hoffman, M. S. (2002). Introduction: Why anthropologists should study disaster. In S. Hoffman & A. Oliver-Smith (Eds.), Catastrophe and culture: The anthropology of disaster. Santa Fe: School of American Research Press.Google Scholar
  30. Palttala, P., Boano, C., Lund, R., & Vos, M. (2012). Communication gaps in disaster management: Perceptions by experts from governmental and non-governmental organizations. Journal of Contingencies and Crisis Management, 20(1), 2–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Polkinghorne, D. E. (1988). Narrative knowing and the human sciences. New York: State University of New York Press.Google Scholar
  32. Ricoeur, P. (1980). Narrative time. Critical Inquiry, 7(1), 169–190.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Riessman, C. K. (2008). Narrative methods for the human sciences. California: Sage.Google Scholar
  34. Scott, A. (2003) H.-G. Gadamer’s truth and method. via Accessed May 1, 2013.
  35. Webster, L., Mertova, P. (2007). Using narrative inquiry as a research method: An introduction to using critical event narrative analysis in research on learning and teaching. Abingdon; UK: Routledge Falmer.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of CommunicationIndian Institute of ManagementLucknowIndia

Personalised recommendations