This chapter explores the infrastructures of audibility in bioacoustics field research, along with the transacoustic objects and communities that contribute towards catching an event, towards the capture of the imaginary organ. Grounded in field research with bioacoustics researchers and research technicians, the chapter explores two modalities of a familiar technical sounding object, the microphone, to illustrate the ways in which data collected morph into the shape of the instrument(s) used to collect data. That is, at once capturing a world and contributing towards its creation, new research instruments combine with old to make new multi-temporal worlds that fuse meaning between animals, technology, and researchers. I use the term “transacoustic community” to describe the technologies that carve out the edges of empirical data, crystallizing it in a moment of collective individuation.
- Adams, J. L. (2010). The place where you go to listen: In search of an ecology of music. Middletown, CT: Wesleyan University Press.Google Scholar
- Bruyninckx, J. (2012). Sound sterile: Making scientific field recordings in ornithology. In T. Pinch & K. Bijsterveld (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of sound studies (pp. 127–150). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
- Chion, M. (1999). The voice in cinema (C. Gorbman, Trans.). New York, NY: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
- Gabrys, J. (2016). Program earth: Environmental sensing technology and the making of a computational planet. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
- Grosz, E. (2008). Chaos, territory, art: Deleuze and the framing of the earth. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
- Latour, B. (1999). Pandora’s hope: Essays on the reality of science studies. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
- Mesaros, A., Heittola, T., & Virtanen, T. (2016, August). TUT database for acoustic scene classification and sound event detection. In 2016 24th European Signal Processing Conference (EUSIPCO) (pp. 1128–1132). IEEE.Google Scholar
- Stowell, D., Benetos, E., & Gill, L. F. (2017). On-bird sound recordings: Automatic acoustic recognition of activities and contexts. IEEE/ACM Transactions on Audio, Speech, and Language Processing, 25(6), 1193–1206.Google Scholar
- Thoreau, D. (1885). The writings of Henry David Thoreau (Vol. 6). Boston: Houghton Mifflin.Google Scholar
- Truax, B. (2001). Acoustic communication (Vol. 1). Westport: Greenwood Publishing Group.Google Scholar
- Vallee, M. (2018, September 17). Tour de Frank. Field notes at the Frank Slide site.Google Scholar
- Viel, J. M. (2014). Habitat preferences of the common nighthawk (Chordeiles minor) in cities and villages in southeastern Wisconsin (Doctoral dissertation). Retrieved from https://dc.uwm.edu/etd/516/. The University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee.
- von Uexküll, J. J. (1934/2010). A foray into the worlds of animals and humans: With a theory of meaning (J. D. O’Neil, Trans.). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
- Westerkamp, H. (2001). Speaking from inside the soundscape. In D. Rothenberg & M. Ulvaeus (Eds.), The book of music and nature: An anthology of sounds, words, thoughts. Middletown, CT: Wesleyan University Press.Google Scholar