Advertisement

Chapter Ten: Promoting Health as a Form of Capital: The Transformation of the Danish Healthcare Field as Experienced By Private Healthcare Professionals

  • Kristian LarsenEmail author
  • Ivan Harsløf
Chapter

Abstract

The predominantly public Danish healthcare system offers free or heavily subsidised access to healthcare services. Yet, as part of a general reorientation of Danish society towards marketisation in recent decades, private sector medicine has gained some foothold. The expansion of private healthcare services has been stimulated by a dramatic increase in private health insurance and a fully-fledged adoption of new public management strategies. This chapter examines how the marketisation of healthcare services, and transformations in the field of employment, may have brought about a more general commodification of health, nurturing health as an object of individual investment. It presents an analysis of four cases revolving around health professionals’ experiences with peer pressure to engage in health-related activities, their reflections on patients’ motives for seeking private health services, as well as their own strategies for maintaining and improving their health status. We conclude that transformations of fields and interrelations between them promote health investments within healthcare institutions—including private healthcare institutions—among patients and the service staff themselves on different levels. The healthcare professionals display a high level of reflection on how to play the ‘health game’, navigating a field increasingly dominated by processes of commercialisation and individualisation.

References

  1. Andersen, P.T. and Jensen, J.J. (2010). Healthcare reform in Denmark. Scandinavian Journal of Public Health, 38(3), pp. 246–252.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Andreasen, M.N., Søgaard, J., Kjellberg, J., et al. (2009). Privat/offentlig samspil i sundhedsvæsenet [Private/Public Interplay in the Healthcare Services]. Copenhagen: Dansk sundhedsinstitut.Google Scholar
  3. Bourdieu, P. (1981). Ce que parler veux dire: L’économie des échanges linguistiques [That Talk Means: The Economics of Linguistic Exchanges]. Paris: Fayard.Google Scholar
  4. Bourdieu, P. (1999). The Weight of the World: Social Suffering in Contemporary Society. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
  5. Bourdieu, P. and Farage, S. (1994). Rethinking the state: genesis and structure of the bureaucratic field. Sociological Theory, 12, pp. 1–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bourdieu, P. and Wacquant, L.J.D. (1992). An Invitation to Reflexive Sociology. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
  7. Breidahl, K.N. and Larsen, F. (2015). Udfordringer og dilemmaer i det offentlige-private samspil på beskæftigelsesområdet: markedsgørelse i flere versioner [Challenges and dilemmas in public-private interplay in the area of employment]. Politika, 47, pp. 503–521.Google Scholar
  8. Collyer, F.M., Willis, K.F. and Lewis, S. (2017). Gatekeepers in the healthcare sector: knowledge and Bourdieu’s concept of field. Social Science and Medicine, 186, pp. 96–103.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Danish Regions. (2016). Regionernes resultater 2016 [The Results from the Regions 2016]. Copenhagen.Google Scholar
  10. Danish Ministry of Employment. (2012). Forslag til lov om ændring af lov om en aktiv beskæftigelsesindsats, lov om aktiv socialpolitik, lov om social pension og forskellige andre love [Proposal to Change the Law on Active Employment]. Copenhagen.Google Scholar
  11. Danish Ministry of Health and Domestic Affairs. (2007). Sundhedssektoren i tal [The Health Sector in Numbers]. Copenhagen.Google Scholar
  12. Glaser, B. (1978). Theoretical Sensitivity: Advances in the Methodology of Grounded Theory. Mill Valley: Sociology Press.Google Scholar
  13. Green-Pedersen, C. and Baggesen, K.M. (2009). Between economic constraints and popular entrenchment: The development of the Danish welfare state 1982–2005. In: K. Schubert, S. Hegelich and U. Bazant (eds.) The Handbook of European Welfare Systems. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  14. Harsløf, I. (2004). Enterprise Rehabilitation: Involving Enterprises in the Vocational Rehabilitation Efforts in Denmark. Paper presented at the 20th World Congress of Rehabilitation International, June. Lillestrøm.Google Scholar
  15. Harsløf, I., Søbjerg Nielsen, U. and Feiring, M. (2016). Danish and Norwegian hospital social workers’ cross-institutional work amidst inter-sectoral restructuring of health and social welfare. European Journal of Social Work, 20(4), pp. 1–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Hindhede, A.L. and Larsen, K. (2018). Prestige hierarchies of diseases and specialities in a field perspective. Social Theory and Health, 17(2), pp. 1–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Hornemann Møller, I. (2013). A liberalistic handling of new social risks – Danish experiences from three decades of social policy reform. In: I. Harsløf and R. Ulmestig (eds.) Changing Social Risks and Social Policy Responses in the Nordic Welfare States. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan. pp. 25–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Håvold, O.K., Harsløf, I. and Andreassen, T.A. (2017). Externalizing an ‘asset model’ of activation: Creative institutional work by frontline workers in the Norwegian Labour and Welfare Service. Social Policy and Administration, 52(1), pp. 178–196.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Kirkegaard, K.L. (2011). Fitnesskultur.dk Fitness sektorens historie, de aktive udøvere og breddeidrættens kommercialisering. Ph.d. University of Southern Denmark, Odense (The history of Fitness culture, active practitioners and the commercialization of mainstream sports).Google Scholar
  20. Kvist, J. and Harsløf, I. (2014). Workfare with welfare revisited: instigating dual tracks of insiders and outsiders. In: I. Lødemel and A. Moreira (eds.) Activation or Workfare? Governance and the Neo-Liberal Convergence. New York: Oxford University Press. pp. 47–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Larsen, K., Cutchin, M. and Harsløf, I. (2013). Health capital: new health risks and personal investments in the body in the context of changing Nordic welfare states. In: I. Harsløf and R. Ulmestig (eds.) Changing Social Risks and Social Policy Responses in the Nordic Welfare States. New York: Palgrave Macmillan. pp. 165–188.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Larsen, K., Harsløf, I., Højbjerg, K. and Hindhede, A.L. (2018). Health Capital: An Empirical Study of Danish Healthcare Professionals’ Bodily Investments. Paper XIX ISA World Congress of Sociology, Toronto, Canada. pp. 548–549.Google Scholar
  23. Møller Pedersen, K. (2005). Kommunal medfinansiering af sundhedsvæsenet: en idé på sandgrund?[Municipal Co-financing of the Healthcare Field: An Idea or on Sandbunf]. Odense: Syddansk Universitetsforlag.Google Scholar
  24. Møller Pedersen, K. (2010). Analyse: Afliv myterne om privathospitalerne [Analysis: the myths about the privat hospitals]. Politiken, 3 April.Google Scholar
  25. Nomesco, E.G. (2017). Health Statistics for the Nordic Countries 2017. Copenhagen: Copenhagen: NOMESCO-NOSOSCO.Google Scholar
  26. OECD. (2017a). Health at a Glance 2017. Paris: Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development.Google Scholar
  27. OECD. (2017b). OECD Employment Outlook 2017. Employment outlook. Paris: Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development.Google Scholar
  28. Pedersen, O.K. (2011). Konkurrencestaten [The Competition State]. Copenhagen: Hans Reizels forlag.Google Scholar
  29. Rosholm, M., Sørensen, K.L., Skipper, L., et al. (2018). Effektive sagsbehandlerstrategier i beskæftigelsesindsatsen [Effective Caseworker Strategies in the Employment Services]. Copenhagen: Væksthusets Forskningscenter.Google Scholar
  30. The Danish Patient Safety Authority. (2018). Udviklingen i brug af alternativ behandling i Danmark 1987–2010 [Development in Use of Alternative Treatment in Denmark 1987–2010]. Available at: https://www.srab.dk/service-menu/statistik/udviklingen-i-brug-af-alternativ-behandling-i-danmark-1987-2010/.
  31. Ugebrevet A4. (2008). Velstillede vælter sig i sundhedsforsikringer [The Affluent Are Rolling in Health Insurances]. 1 December.Google Scholar
  32. Vandenberghe, F. (1999). “The Real is Relational”: an epistemological analysis of Pierre Bourdieu’s generative structuralism. Sociological Theory, 17, pp. 32–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Vollaard, H., van de Bovenkamp, H.M. and Vrangbæk, K. (2013). The emerging EU quality of care policy: From sharing information to enforcement. Health Policy, 111(3), pp. 226–233.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Oslo Metropolitan UniversityOsloNorway
  2. 2.University Hospitals Centre for Health Research (UCSF)CopenhagenDenmark
  3. 3.Department of Public HealthCopenhagen UniversityCopenhagenDenmark

Personalised recommendations