Advertisement

Leadership for Teacher Professional Learning: A Case Study of Two ‘New-High-Quality’ Primary Schools in Shanghai

  • Jie CaoEmail author
  • Nicholas Sun-keung Pang
Chapter

Abstract

This study involving qualitative case studies of two primary schools in Shanghai, China, investigates how principals lead to support teacher professional learning in response to an education reform agenda. The findings show key effective leadership strategies in response to the education changes. They include providing professional learning opportunities and resources; distributed leadership for collaborative learning; monitoring the effectiveness of teacher learning, and committing teachers to professional learning. The findings are consistent with the evidence in the Western literature but with varying unique characteristics. This study contributes to the understanding of the relationship between school leadership and teacher professional learning especially in context to significant shifts in education policies.

Notes

Acknowledgements

The work described in this chapter was supported by a grant from the Research Grants Council of Hong Kong Special Administrative Region, China (RGC Ref. No. CUHK 14408814).

References

  1. Akkerman, S. F., & Bakker, A. (2011). Boundary crossing and boundary objects. Review of Educational Research, 81(2), 132–169.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bass, B. M., & Bass, R. (2008). The Bass handbook of leadership: Theory, research, and managerial applications. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
  3. Bryk, A., Camburn, E., & Louis, K. S. (1999). Professional community in Chicago elementary schools: Facilitating factors and organizational consequences. Educational Administration Quarterly, 35(5), 751–781.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Buttram, J. L., & Farley-Ripple, E. N. (2016). The role of principals in professional learning communities. Leadership and Policy in Schools, 15(2), 192–220.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Cheng, K. M. (2010). Shanghai and Hong Kong: Two distinct examples of education reform in China. In OECD (Ed.), Strong performers and successful reformers in education: Lessons from PISA for the United States (pp. 83–115). http://dx.doi.org/10.1787/9789264096660-en.
  6. Clement, M., & Vandenberghe, R. (2001). How school leaders can promote teachers’ professional development. An account from the field. School Leadership and Management, 21(1), 43–57.Google Scholar
  7. Dello-Iacovo, B. (2009). Curriculum reform and ‘quality education’ in China: An overview. International Journal of Educational Development, 29(3), 241–249.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. DuFour, R., & Berkey, T. (1995). The principal as staff developer. Journal of Staff Development, 16(4), 2–6.Google Scholar
  9. Engeström, Y., Engeström, R., & Kärkkäinen, M. (1995). Polycontextuality and boundary crossing in expert cognition: Learning and problem solving in complex work activities. Learning and Instruction, 5(4), 319–336.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Evans, L. (2014). Leadership for professional development and learning: Enhancing our understanding of how teachers develop. Cambridge Journal of Education, 44(2), 179–198.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Fullan, M. (1992). Teacher development and educational change. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  12. Goddard, R., Goddard, Y., Kim, E. S., & Miller, R. (2015). A theoretical and empirical analysis of the roles of instructional leadership, teacher collaboration, and collective efficacy beliefs in support of student learning. American Journal of Education, 121(4), 501–530.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Guan, Q., & Meng, W. J. (2007). China’s new national curriculum reform: Innovation, challenges and strategies. Frontiers of Education in China, 2(4), 579–604.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Gumus, S., Bulut, O., & Bellibas, M. S. (2013). The relationship between principal leadership and teacher collaboration in Turkish primary schools: A multilevel analysis. Education Research and Perspectives, 40(1), 1–29.Google Scholar
  15. Hairon, S., & Dimmock, C. (2012). Singapore schools and professional learning communities: Teacher professional development and school leadership in an Asian hierarchical system. Educational Review, 64(4), 405–424.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Hallinger, P. (2003). Leading educational change: Reflections on the practice of instructional and transformational leadership. Cambridge Journal of Education, 33(3), 329–352.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Hallinger, P. (2005). Instructional leadership and the school principal: A passing fancy that refuses to fade away. Leadership and Policy in Schools, 4(3), 221–239.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Hallinger, P. (2011). Leadership for learning: Lessons from 40 years of empirical research. Journal of Educational Administration, 49(2), 125–142.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Hallinger, P., & Heck, R. H. (1998). Exploring the principal’s contribution to school effectiveness: 1980–1995. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 9(2), 157–191.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Hallinger, P., & Lu, J. F. (2014). Modelling the effects of principal leadership and school capacity on teacher professional learning in Hong Kong primary schools. School Leadership and Management, 34(5), 481–501.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. House, R. J., Hanges, P. J., Javidan, M., Dorfman, P. W., & Gupta, V. (2004). Culture, leadership, and organizations: The GLOBE study of 62 societies. Thousand Oaks, Calif.: Sage publications.Google Scholar
  22. Hu, X. H. (2015). Xin youzhi xuexiao zhuiqiu shenme? [What do new-high-quality schools pursue?]. Shanghai jiaoyu keyan, 3, 5–6.Google Scholar
  23. Ke, Z., Chen, S. Y., & Ren, Y. Q. (2013). Zhongdian xuexiao yu fei zhongdian xuexiao de xiaozhang lingdao xingwei bijiao [Comparison of principals’ leadership behaviors in the key and the ordinary schools]. Beijing daxue jiaoyu pinglun, 11(1), 63–82.Google Scholar
  24. Lee, J. C. K., & Yin, H. B. (2011). Teachers’ emotions and professional identity in curriculum reform: A Chinese perspective. Journal of Educational Change, 12(1), 25–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Leithwood, K. (1994). Leadership for school restructuring. Educational Administration Quarterly, 30(4), 498–518.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Leithwood, K., & Duke, D. (1999). A century’s quest to understand school leadership. In J. Murphy & K. Louis (Eds.), Handbook of research on educational administration (pp. 45–72). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
  27. Leithwood, K., & Jantzi, D. (2005). A review of transformational school leadership research 1996–2005. Leadership and Policy in Schools, 4(3), 177–199.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Leithwood, K., Patten, S., & Jantzi, D. (2010). Testing a conception of how school leadership influences student learning. Educational Administration Quarterly, 46(5), 671–706.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Li, Q., & Ni, Y. J. (2011). Impact of curriculum reform: Evidence of change in classroom practice in mainland China. International Journal of Educational Research, 50(2), 71–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Little, J. W. (1993). Teachers’ professional development in a climate of educational reform. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 15(2), 129–151.Google Scholar
  31. Liu, S. N., Hallinger, P., & Feng, D. M. (2016). Learning-centered leadership and teacher learning in China: Does trust matter? Journal of Educational Administration, 54(6), 661–682.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Murphy, J., Elliott, S. N., Goldring, E., & Porter, A. C. (2007). Leadership for learning: A research-based model and taxonomy of behaviors. School Leadership and Management, 27(2), 179–201.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. OECD. (2011). Strong performers and successful reformers in education: Lessons from PISA for the United States. http://dx.doi.org/10.1787/9789264096660-en.
  34. Oplatka, I. (2004). The principalship in developing countries: Context, characteristics and reality. Comparative Education, 40(3), 427–448.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Pang, N. S. K. (1996). School values and teachers’ feelings: A LISREL model. Journal of Educational Administration, 34(2), 64–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Pang, N. S. K. (1998). The binding forces that hold school organizations together. Journal of Educational Administration, 36(4), 314–333.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Pang, N. S. K. (2003). Binding forces and teachers’ school life: A recursive model. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 14(3), 293–320.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Patton, M. Q. (1990). Qualitative evaluation and research methods (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
  39. Printy, S. M. (2008). Leadership for teacher learning: A community of practice perspective. Educational Administration Quarterly, 44(2), 187–226.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Qian, H. Y., Walker, A., & Li, X. J. (2017). The west wind versus the east wind: Instructional leadership model in China. Journal of Educational Administration, 55(2).Google Scholar
  41. Qian, H. Y., Walker, A., & Yang, X. W. (2016). Building and leading a learning culture among teachers: A case study of a Shanghai primary school. Educational Management Administration and Leadership, 45(1), 101–122.Google Scholar
  42. Robinson, V. M. J., Lloyd, C. A., & Rowe, K. J. (2008). The impact of leadership on student outcomes: An analysis of the differential effects of leadership types. Educational Administration Quarterly, 44(5), 635–674.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Spillane, J. P. (2006). Distributed leadership (1st ed.). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
  44. Strauss, A., & Corbin, J. (1998). Basics of qualitative research. Thousands Oaks: CA: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
  45. Suchman, L. (1993). Working relations of technology production and use. Computer Supported Cooperative Work, 2(1–2), 21–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Sun, J. P., & Leithwood, K. (2012). Transformational school leadership effects on student achievement. Leadership and Policy in Schools, 11(4), 418–451.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Thoonen, E. E. J., Sleegers, P. J. C., Oort, F. J., Peetsma, T. T. D., & Geijsel, F. P. (2011). How to improve teaching practices the role of teacher motivation, organizational factors, and leadership practices. Educational Administration Quarterly, 47(3), 496–536.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Walker, A., & Dimmock, C. (2002). Moving school leadership beyond its narrow boundaries: Developing a cross-cultural approach. In K. A. Leithwood & P. Hallinger (Eds.), Second international handbook of educational leadership and administration (pp. 167–202). Netherlands: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Walker, A., & Qian, H. Y. (2012). Reform disconnection in China. Peabody Journal of Education, 87(2), 162–177.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Wang, T. (2016). School leadership and professional learning community: Case study of two senior high schools in Northeast China. Asia Pacific Journal of Education, 36(2), 202–216.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Wenger, E. (2000). Communities of practice and social learning systems. Organization, 7(2), 225–246.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Xia, X. M. (2013). Xin youzhi xuexiao zouxiang nali: Jiyu 43 suo xuexiao biange lujing de fenxi [Where do new-high-quality schools go: Change paths analysis of 43 schools]. Shanghai jiaoyu keyan, 1, 10–14.Google Scholar
  53. Yin, R. K. (2003). Case study research: Design and methods. California: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
  54. You, Y. H. (2007). A deep reflection on the “key school system” in basic education in China. Frontiers of Education in China, 2(2), 229–239.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Youngs, P., & King, M. B. (2002). Principal leadership for professional development to build school capacity. Educational Administration Quarterly, 38(5), 643–670.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Yukl, G. A. (2010). Leadership in organizations. Upper Saddle River, N.J.: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
  57. Zhang, J., & Pang, N. S. K. (2016a). Exploring the characteristics of professional learning communities in China: A mixed-method study. The Asia-Pacific Education Researcher, 25(1), 11–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Zhang, J., & Pang, N. S. K. (2016b). Investigating the development of professional learning communities: Compare schools in Shanghai and Southwest China. Asia Pacific Journal of Education, 36(2), 217–230.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Zhong, Q. Q. (2006). Curriculum reform in China: Challenges and reflections. Frontiers of Education in China, 1(3), 370–382.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Educational AdministrationBeijing Institute of EducationBeijingChina
  2. 2.Department of Education, Faculty of EducationEast China Normal UniversityShanghaiChina
  3. 3.Department of Educational Administration and PolicyThe Chinese University of Hong KongShatinHong Kong SAR, China

Personalised recommendations