Advertisement

Enacting Bodies: The Multiplicity of Whey Protein and the Making of Corporealities

  • Samantha KingEmail author
  • Gavin Weedon
Chapter

Abstract

This chapter is situated within the long and diverse tradition of Sport Studies scholarship focused on how best to conceptualize the body. Drawing on the work of Science and Technology Studies (STS) scholar, Annemarie Mol, we contrast a perspectival approach, in which bodies are articulated as singular, passive things about which people hold different views (the dominant orientation in the disciplines of kinesiology and sport science today), with an ontological approach that centres bodies as they come into being—or fall apart—through practices. In advocating for a focus on practice, and the multiplicity of objects it implies, Mol seeks to show how different versions of bodies are coordinated in different locations and thus how they might be enacted otherwise. We put Mol’s ideas to work in our ongoing study of whey protein powder, a nutritional supplement best known for enacting fit bodies. Tracing whey’s multiplicity, and its shift from toxic byproduct of dairy production to ostensibly healthy commodity, helps trouble notions of individual, physically bounded, human embodiment. “Following” whey has also led us to broader considerations of body-environment relations, thereby extending the scope of Mol’s work and demonstrating the ecological embeddedness of the moving body in sport and physical culture.

References

  1. Abrahamsson, S., Bertoni, F., Mol, A., & Martin, R. I. (2015). Living with omega-3: New materialism and enduring concerns. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space, 33, 4–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Alaimo, S. (2010). Bodily natures: Science, environment and the material self. Bloomington: University of Indiana Press.Google Scholar
  3. Barad, K. (2007). Meeting the universe halfway: Quantum physics and the entanglement of matter and meaning. London: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
  4. Bennett, J. (2010). Vibrant matter: A political ecology of things. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Berg, M., & Mol, A. (1998). Differences in medicine: Unraveling practices, techniques and bodies. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bergquist, L. (2008, October 31). Dairy plant to pay fine in river whey spill that killed fish. Journal Sentinel. Retrieved from http://archive.jsonline.com/news/wisconsin/33670594.html/.
  7. Braidotti, R. (2016). Posthuman critical theory. In D. Banerji & M. R. Paranjape (Eds.), Critical posthumanism and planetary futures (pp. 13–32). Springer, India.Google Scholar
  8. Braidotti, R. (2018). A theoretical framework for the critical posthumanities. Theory, Culture and Society, Online First.Google Scholar
  9. Bunds, K., & Casper, J. (2018). Sport, physical culture, and the environment: An introduction. Sociology of Sport Journal, 35, 1–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Deleuze, G., & Guattari, F. (1987). A thousand plateaus: Capitalism and schizophrenia. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
  11. Environmental Protection Agency. (2011). Summary of criminal prosecutions. Retrieved from https://cfpub.epa.gov/compliance/criminal_prosecution/index.cfm?action=3&prosecution_sumary_id=2138.
  12. Erisman, J., Galloway, J., Dise, N., Sutton, M., Bleeker, A., Grizzetti, B., et al. (2013). Nitrogen: Too much of a vital resource. World Wildlife Fund Netherlands. Retrieved from http://www.nprint.org/WWFReport.
  13. Guthman, J., & Mansfield, B. (2012). The implications of environmental epigenetics: A new direction for geographic inquiry on health, space, and nature-society relations. Progress in Human Geography, 37(4), 486–504.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Haraway, D. (2008). When species meet. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
  15. Ingham, A. G. (1997). Toward a department of physical cultural studies and an end to tribal warfare. In J. M. Fernandez-Balboa (Ed.), Critical postmodernism in human movement, physical education, and sport (pp. 157–182). Albany: State University of New York Press.Google Scholar
  16. James, M. (2015). Cheese whey spill: $80,000 fine. Retrieved from https://www.siskinds.com/envirolaw/cheese-whey-spill-80000-fine/.
  17. King, S., & Weedon, G. (Accepted). Embodiment is ecological: The metabolic lives of whey protein powder. Body & Society.Google Scholar
  18. Latour, B. (2004). Why has critique run out of steam? From matters of fact to matters of concern. Critical Inquiry, 30, 225–248.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Latour, B. (2005). Reassembling the social: An introduction to actor-network theory. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  20. Latour, B., & Woolgar, S. (1979). Laboratory life: The construction of scientific facts. Beverly Hills: Sage.Google Scholar
  21. Law, J., & Mol, A. (2002). Complexities: Social studies of knowledge practices. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Lougheed, S. (2013). An actor-network theory examination of cheese and whey production in Ontario (Unpublished master’s thesis). Queen’s University, Kingston, Ontario.Google Scholar
  23. Millington, B., & Wilson, B. (2016). The greening of golf: Sport, globalization and the environment. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Millot, J. (2016, December 22). Do you even lift bro? Weighing protein powder performance online. 1010Data. Retrieved from https://www.1010data.com/company/blog/do-you-even-lift-broweighing-protein-powder-performance-online/.
  25. Mol, A. (1999). Ontological politics: A word and some questions. The Sociological Review, 47(1), 74–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Mol, A. (2002). The body multiple: Ontology in medical practice. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Mol, A. (2008). The logic of care: Health and the problem of patient choice. London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Mol, A. (2012). Layers or versions? Human bodies and the love of bitterness. In B. Turner (Ed.), The Routledge handbook of the body (pp. 119–129). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  29. Mol, A. (2018). Multiple bodies, political ontologies, and the logic of care: An interview with Annemarie Mol. D. Martin, M. J. Spink & P. P. G. Pereira. Interface: Comunicacão Saúde Educação, 22(6), 5–8.Google Scholar
  30. Mol, A., & Law, J. (2004). Embodied action, enacted bodies: The example of hypoglycaemia. Body & Society, 10(2–3), 43–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Mol, A., Mosser, I., & Pols, J. (Eds.). (2010). Care in practice: On tinkering in clinics, homes and farms. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
  32. Page, A. (2016). ‘The greatest victory which the chemist has won in the fight (…) against Nature’: Nitrogenous fertilizers in Great Britain and the British Empire, 1910s–1950s. History of Science, 54(4), 383–398.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Pronger, B. (2002). Body fascism: Salvation in the technology of physical fitness. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Schmidt, C. (2014, April 8–9). The rise of protein in the global health and wellness and supplement arenas. Global Food Forums. Retrieved from https://www.globalfoodforums.com/wpcontent/uploads/2014/04/Chris-Schmidt-Euromonitor-2014-Protein-Trends-Technologies.pdf.
  35. Senanayake, N., & King, B. (2017). Health-environment futures: Complexity, uncertainty, and bodies. Progress in Human Geography, Online First.Google Scholar
  36. Smithers, G. (2008). Whey and whey proteins: From ‘gutter-to-gold’. International Dairy Journal, 18(7), 695–704.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. United States Department of Agriculture. (2014). Whey to ethanol: A biofuel role for dairy cooperatives? Research Report 214. Retrieved from http://www.rd.usda.gov/files/RR214.pdf1.01.
  38. Waterton, C., & Yusoff, K. (2017). Indeterminate bodies: Introduction. Body & Society, 23(3), 3–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Queen’s UniversityKingstonCanada
  2. 2.Nottingham Trent UniversityNottinghamUK

Personalised recommendations