The Philippine–American War, 1899–1913, and the US Counterinsurgency and Pacification Campaign

  • Kenneth E. BauzonEmail author


This chapter discusses the consolidation of the US colonial rule, continuing the pattern of using ruse and force against the Filipino resistance fighters but especially against the Muslims of Moroland. Throughout the process of counterinsurgency, application of ruthless violence—noted by San Juan, recalling Mark Twain’s satirical essay as among the most brutal in all of the colonial world—has been methodical, remorseless, and justified by the belief in a racial hierarchy wherein the Filipinos, including the Moros, were deemed as savages, incapable of self-government, and in need of “civilization.” Notes from San Juan indicate that the US acquisition of the Philippines, far from being benign, has actually sprung from the imperative of capital accumulation, and that colonial policies have set the stage for a clientelist Philippine–US relations, the continuing conflict in Moroland, and the diaspora under the neoliberal division of labor designed to extract surplus value from former colonies through unequal exchange.


  1. Aguinaldo, Emilio, “Inaugural Address”, Official Gazette, Government of the Philippines, January 23, 1899. In:
  2. Allen, James Edgar and John J. Reidy, The Battle of Bayan and Other Battles, Being a History of the Moro Campaign from April 17 to Dec. 30, 1902: A Record of Events Occurring during a Period of Eight Months’ Service in the Lake Region of Mindanao—Also Letters of Congratulation from His Excellency the President of the United State, Major General Adna R. Chaffee, and Others (Manila: E. C. McCullough & Co., 1903). In:
  3. Balce, Nerissa, “The American Vampire and the Filipino Journalists: Philippine Libel Laws Then and Now”, Interaksyon, February 22, 2014. In:
  4. ———, “The Filipina’s Breast: Savagery, Docility and the Erotics of the American Empire”, Social Text, 24, 2 (Summer 2006): 89–110. In:
  5. Beede, Benjamin R., ed., The War of 1898 and U.S. Interventions, 1898 to 1934: An Encyclopedia (London, UK: Routledge, 1994), 778pp.Google Scholar
  6. Fulton, Robert A., Moroland: The History of Uncle Sam and the Moros 1899–1920 (Bend, OR: Tumalo Creek Press, 2016 ed.). In:;
  7. McCoy, Alfred W., Policing America’s Empire—The United States, the Philippines, and the Rise of the Surveillance State (Madison, WI: The University of Wisconsin Press, 2009), 659pp. Print.Google Scholar
  8. McKenna, Thomas M., Muslim Rulers and Rebels: Everyday Politics and Armed Separatism in the Southern Philippines (Oakland, CA: University of California Press, 1998), 343pp.Google Scholar
  9. San Juan, E., Jr., “African American Internationalism and Solidarity with the Philippine Revolution”, Socialism and Democracy, 24, 2 (July 2010): 32–65. In: Scholar
  10. ———, “Afterword: From Development to Liberation—The Third World in the ‘New World Order’”, in Development and Democratization in the Third World: Myths, Hopes and Realities, edited by Kenneth E. Bauzon (Washington, DC: Crane Russak/Taylor & Francis, 1992), pp. 297–310.Google Scholar
  11. ———, “An African American Soldier in the Philippine Revolution: An Homage to David Fagen”, Cultural Logic (2009). In:
  12. ———, Between Empire and Insurgency—The Philippines in the New Millenium: Essays in History, Comparative Literature, and Cultural Politics (Quezon City, Philippines: University of the Philippines Press, 2015), 318pp.Google Scholar
  13. ———, Crisis in the Philippines: The Making of a Revolution (South Hadley, MA: Bergin & Garvey Publishers, 1986), 265pp. Print.Google Scholar
  14. ———, Hegemony and Strategies of Transgression: Essays in Cultural Studies and Comparative Literature (Albany, NY: State University of New York Press, 1995), 286pp.Google Scholar
  15. ———, In the Wake of Terror; Class, Race, Nation, Ethnicity in the Postmodern World (Lanham, MD: Lexington Books, 2007a), 232pp.Google Scholar
  16. ———, The Philippine Temptation: Dialectics of Philippines-U.S. Literary Relations (Philadelphia, PA: Temple University Press, 1996).Google Scholar
  17. ———, U.S. Imperialism and Revolution in the Philippines (New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 2007b), 265pp. Print.Google Scholar
  18. ———, “War in the Filipino Imagination: Filipino Writers in the United States Wrestling with the Minotaur”, The Philippines Matrix Project, Interventions Toward a National-Democratic Socialist Transformation, December 13, 2011. In:
  19. Schirmer, Daniel B. and Stephen Rosskamm Shalom, eds., “The Philippine-American War” (Editors’ Introduction), in The Philippine Reader: A History of Colonialism, Neocolonialism, Dictatorship, and Resistance (Boston, MA: South End Press, 1987), 8–19. In:,+Spain,+United+States&source=bl&ots=9855VslcAG&sig=DByMdbBDVSWMv676gLi57_lnQ8Q&hl=en&sa=X&ved=0CB0Q6AEwADgKahUKEwiM5uyV07HHAhVIbj4KHR0iA40#v=onepage&q=mock%20battle%20for%20Manila%2C%20Spain%2C%20United%20States&f=false.
  20. Veric, Charlie Samuya, “Culture from Imperialism: American Colonial Education in the Philippines”, in Back to the Future: Perspectives on the Thomasite Legacy to Philippine Education, edited by Corazon D. Villareal (Manila, Philippines: American Studies Association of the Philippines in Cooperation with the Cultural Affairs Office, US Embassy, 2003), 417pp.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.St. Joseph’s College—New YorkBrooklynUSA

Personalised recommendations