Advertisement

Factors Influencing Household Expenditure on Private Tutoring in Higher Education

  • Anuneeta Mitra
  • Nivedita Sarkar
Chapter

Abstract

In the wake of higher education experiencing massive expansion, GER (Gross Enrolment Ratio) being 25.8%, on the one hand, and numerous anomalies like deteriorating teaching-learning quality, on the other, have led to the mushrooming of private coaching. It has, in turn, contributed in magnifying distortions in the realm of higher education, further eroding its public good nature. In this context, this chapter draws from NSS 71st round unit-level records, schedule 25.2, pertaining to Social Consumption: Education (2014–15) and makes an attempt to capture the pattern and cost (at the household level) of private coaching in India for higher educated individuals pertaining to the age group 18–23 years across social groups, gender, location, type of institutions and MPCE quintiles. Then, it eventually captures various social, economic, educational and locational factors influencing household expenditure on private coaching using a Tobit model for the entire country, which has been further disaggregated at the level of rural and urban sectors.

Keywords

Private coaching higher education Tobit patterns of cost 

References

  1. Alcott, B., & Rose, P. (2015). Schools and learning in rural India and Pakistan: Who goes where and how much are they learning? Prospects, 45, 345–363.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Aslam, M. & Atherton, P. (2012). The shadow education sector in India and Pakistan: The determinants, benefits and equity effects of private tutoring. ESP Working paper Series, 38. http://www.periglobal.org/sites/periglobal.org/files/WP38_Aslam&Atherton.pdf. Last Accessed on 3/9/2017.
  3. Aurini, J. (2004). Educational entrepreneurialism in the private tutoring industry: Balancing profitability with the humanistic face of schooling. Canadian Review of Sociology, 41(4), 475–491.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bhushan, S. (2009). Restructuring higher education in India. Jaipur: Rawat Books.Google Scholar
  5. Biswal, B. P. (1999). Private tutoring and public corruption: A cost-effective education for developing countries. The Developing Economies, 37(2), 222–240.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bray, M. (1999). The shadow education system: Private tutoring and its implications for planners. Fundamentals of educational planning no. 61. Paris: UNESCO International Institute for Educational Planning (IIEP).Google Scholar
  7. Bray, M. (2003). Adverse effects of private supplementary tutoring: Dimensions, implications, and government responses. Paris: UNESCO International Institute for Educational Planning.Google Scholar
  8. Bray, T. M. (2009). Confronting the shadow education system: What government policies for what private tutoring? Paris: IIEP.Google Scholar
  9. Bray, M., & Kwok, P. (2003). Demand for private supplementary tutoring: Conceptual considerations and socio-economic patterns in Hong Kong. Economics of Education Review, 22, 611–620.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Buchmann, C., Condron, D. J., & Roscigno, V. J. (2010). Shadow education, American style: Test preparation, the SAT and college enrollment. Social Forces, 89(2), 435–461.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Dongre, A, Tewary, V (2014). Impact of private tutoring on Learning Levels: Evidence from India. Accountability Initiative working paper series. http://www.educationforallinindia.com/ambirsh_dongre_vibhu_tewary_impact_of_private_tutoring-on_learninglevels_accountability_initiative.pdf. Last Accessed on 3/9/2016.
  12. Global Industry Analyst. (2016). Intense competition among students and the growing need to achieve academic excellence drive the global private tutoring market. Http://Www.Strategyr.Com/Marketresearch/Private_Home_Tutor_Services_Market_Trends.Asp. Last accessed on 3/9/2017.
  13. Goyal, Y. (2019). A policy to regulate coaching centres. The Hindu.Google Scholar
  14. Jonatahan, R. (1990). State education service or Prisoner’s dilemma: The ‘hidden hand’ as source of education policy. Educational Philosophy, 22, (1) 16–(1) 24.Google Scholar
  15. Kim, S., Lee, Ju-Ho. (2001). Demand for education and developmental state: Private tutoring in South Korea. Social Science Research Network Electronic Paper. https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=268284. Last accessed on 3/9/2017.
  16. Lakshmanasamy, T. (2017). Demand for private tuition – A quantile regression analysis of household expenditure on private coaching in India. Journal of educational Planning and Administration, 31(2), 115–139.Google Scholar
  17. Ministry of Human Resource and Development. (2016). Private tuition: Extent pattern and determinants. New Delhi: Government of India.Google Scholar
  18. Ministry of Human Resource and Development. (2018). All India survey on higher education. New Delhi: Government of India.Google Scholar
  19. Psacharopoulos, G., & Papakonstantinou, G. (2005). The real university cost in a “free” higher education country. Economics of Education Review, 24(1), 103–108.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Sabharwal, N., Malish, C. M. (2017). Achieving Academic Integration in Higher Education in India. Centre for Policy research in Higher Education, Policy Brief 2, NUEPA.Google Scholar
  21. Sen, A. (2002). Introduction. In Pratichi education report: A study in West Bengal. New Dehli: Pratichi Research Team.Google Scholar
  22. Stevenson, D. L., & Baker, D. P. (1992). Shadow education and allocation in formal schooling: Transition to university in Japan. American Journal of Sociology, 97(6), 1639–1657.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Sujatha, K. (2014). Private tuition in India: trends and issues. Revue internationale d’éducation de Sèvres. http://ries.revues.org/3796. Last accessed on 3/9/2017.
  24. Tansel, A., & Bircan, F. (2006). Demand for education in Turkey: A Tobit analysis of private tutoring expenditures. Economics of education review., 25(3), 303–313.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Tansel, A., & Bircan Bodur, F. (2005). Effect of private tutoring on university entrance examination performance in Turkey. IZA.DP 1609.Google Scholar
  26. Tilak, J. B. (2004). Public subsidies in education in India. Economic and Political Weekly, 343–359.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Anuneeta Mitra
    • 1
  • Nivedita Sarkar
    • 2
  1. 1.Researcher, Centre for Policy Research in Higher Education, NIEPANew DelhiIndia
  2. 2.Ambedkar UniversityNew DelhiIndia

Personalised recommendations