Advertisement

Building Shanghai as an International City: Exchange of Ideas

  • Matthew Skogstad-Stubbs
Chapter

Abstract

This paper seeks to provide a small contribution to urban development by looking beyond the narrow depiction of Shanghai’s growth as the relationship of global capital and local state power. The central hypothesis of this paper is that urban development is influenced not only by economic and political forces but also by how these two variables culminate in ideas about optimal urban environments.

References

  1. Dobbin, Frank, Beth Simmons, and Geoffrey Garrett. 2007. The global diffusion of public policies: social construction, coercion, competition, or learning? Annual Review of Sociology 449–72.Google Scholar
  2. Hay, C. 2002. Political analysis: a critical introduction. Houndmills: Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. He, S. 2007. State-sponsored gentrification under market transition: the case of Shanghai. Urban Affairs Review 43(2): 171–198.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Jessop, B., and N-L. Sum. 2002. An entrepreneurial city in action: Hong Kong’s emerging strategies in and for (inter) urban competition. Urban Studies 2287–2313.Google Scholar
  5. Marcusse, P. 2006. Space in the globalizing city. In The global cities reader, ed. N. Brenner, and R. Keil, 361–369. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  6. Marton, A.M., and W. Wu. 2006. Spaces of globalization: Institutional reforms and spatial economic development in the Pudong new area, Shanghai. Habitat International 30(2): 213–229.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. McDonald, D. 2008. World city syndrome: neoliberalism and inequality in Cape Town. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  8. Olds, K. 1997. Globalizing Shanghai: the global intelligence corps and the building of Pudong. Cities 14(2): 109–123.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Sassen, S. 1991. The global city. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  10. Skogstad-Stubbs, M. 2011. The exchange of ideas in urban development: how an international consensus on global city formation as urban best practice affected shanghai’s political economic pursuit of urban growth and global competitiveness (Master’s Thesis). Ottawa: University of Ottawa Press.Google Scholar
  11. Smith, N. 2002. New globalism, new urbanism: gentrification as global urban strategy. Antipode 427–250.Google Scholar
  12. The Greater London Authority. 2009. A new plan for London: proposals for the Mayor’s London Plan. London: City of London.Google Scholar
  13. Wang, J., and S.S.Y. Lau. 2008. Forming foreign enclaves in Shanghai: state action in globalization. Journal of Housing and the Built Environment 23: 103–118.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Wei, D.Y., C.K. Leung, and J. Luo. 2006. Globalizing Shanghai: foreign investment and urban restructuring. Habitat International 30(2): 231–244.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Wu, V. 1998. The Pudong development zone and China’s economic reforms. Planning Perspectives 13: 133–165.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Wu, F. 2000. Global and local dimensions of place-making: remaking Shanghai as a world city. Urban Studies 37(8): 1359–1377.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Wu, F. 2003. The (Post-) socialist entrepreneurial city as a state project: Shanghai’s reglobalisation in question. Urban Studies 40(9): 1673–1698.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Wu, F. 2006. Globalization, the changing state, and Local Governance in Shanghai. In Local transformations in global cities: Shanghai in comparative perspective, ed. Xiangming Chen. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Singapore 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Parrot SAParisFrance

Personalised recommendations