Civil liberties remain largely intact in postcolonial Hong Kong. Opposition media continue to exist, while Hong Kong people have unbridled access to alternative information through old and new media. The degree of media freedom that Hong Kong people enjoy might seem like a nightmare to many dictators since it allows antigovernment information to propagate and restive citizens to coordinate. Indeed, Hong Kong society has been experiencing incessant waves of social movement which have been aimed at challenging the political status quo since 1997. Paradoxically, pro-establishment parties, namely, those supporting the status quo, have been receiving ever-increasing public support in popular elections. An explanation to this puzzle is outlined in this chapter, and the motivation, methodology, and plan of the book are also discussed.


Vote Share Authoritarian Regime Opposition Parti District Council Opposition Party 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


  1. Adsera, A., Boix, C., & Payne, M. (2003). Are you being served? Political accountability and quality of government. Journal of Law, Economics, and organization, 19(2), 445–490.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Black, D. (1958). The theory of committees and elections. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  3. Blaydes, L. (2010). Elections and distributive politics in Mubarak’s Egypt. Chicago: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  4. Bratton, M., & Van de Walle, N. (1997). Democratic experiments in Africa: Regime transitions in comparative perspective. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Brunetti, A., & Weder, B. (2003). A free press is bad news for corruption. Journal of Public economics, 87(7), 1801–1824.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bunce, V. J., & Wolchik, S. L. (2006). Favorable conditions and electoral revolutions. Journal of Democracy, 17(4), 5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Chan, J. M., & Chung, R. (2003). Who could mobilize half a million to take to the street?, 15–16 July 2003.Google Scholar
  8. Cheibub, J. A., Gandhi, J., & Vreeland, J. R. (2010). Democracy and dictatorship revisited. Public Choice, 143(1), 67–101. ISSN 0048-5829.Google Scholar
  9. Chwe, M. S. Y. (2003). Rational ritual: Culture, coordination, and common knowledge. Princeton: Princeton University Press. ISBN 0691114714.Google Scholar
  10. Diaz-Cayeros, A., Magaloni, B., & Weingast, B. R. (2003). Tragic brilliance: Equilibrium hegemony and democratization in Mexico. Manuscrito. Disponível em:
  11. Downs, A. (1957). An economic theory of democracy. New York: Harper.Google Scholar
  12. Edmond, C. (2013). Information manipulation, coordination, and regime change. The Review of Economic Studies, 80(4), 1422–1458.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Egorov, G., Guriev, S., & Sonin, K. (2009). Why resource-poor dictators allow freer media: A theory and evidence from panel data. American Political Science Review, 103(4), 645.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Gandhi, J. (2008). Political institutions under dictatorship. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Gandhi, J., & Lust-Okar, E. (2009). Elections under authoritarianism. Annual Review of Political Science, 12, 403–422.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Geddes, B. (1999). What do we know about democratization after twenty years? Annual Review of Political Science, 2(1), 115–144.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Geddes, B. (2005). Why parties and elections in authoritarian regimes? In Annual meeting of the American political science association (pp. 456–471). Washington, D.C.Google Scholar
  18. Gilley, B. (2010). Democratic enclaves in authoritarian regimes. Democratization, 17(3), 389–415.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Huffington Post. (2011). Egypt’s Facebook Revolution: Wael Ghonim Thanks the Social Network, 11 Feb 2011.Google Scholar
  20. King, G., Pan, J., & Roberts, M. E. (2013). How censorship in China allows government criticism but silences collective expression. American Political Science Review, 107(2), 326–343.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Levitsky, S., & Way, L. A. (2010). Competitive authoritarianism: Hybrid regimes after the cold war. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Lindberg, S. I. (2006). Democracy and elections in Africa. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
  23. Lust-Okar, E. (2009). Legislative elections in hegemonic authoritarian regimes: Competitive clientelism and resistance to democratization. In: I.-L. Staffan (Ed.), Democratization by elections: A new mode of transition (Vol. 2009, pp. 226–45). Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, c2009.Google Scholar
  24. Ma, N. (2007b). State-press relationship in post 1997 Hong Kong: Constant negotiation amidst self restraint. The China Quarterly, 192, 949–970.Google Scholar
  25. Magaloni, B. (2006). Voting for autocracy: Hegemonic party survival and its demise in Mexico. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Magaloni, B. (2008). Credible power-sharing and the longevity of authoritarian rule. Comparative Political Studies, 41(4/5), 715.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. O’Brien, K. J. & Li, L. (2006). Rightful resistance in rural China. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Schedler, A. (2002). The nested game of democratization by elections. International Political Science Review, 23(1), 103–122.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Treisman, D. (2007). What have we learned about the causes of corruption from ten years of cross-national empirical research? Annual Review of Political Science, 10, 211–244.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Washington Post. (2011). New Pages in Egypt’s Facebook Revolution, 23 Mar 2011.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Singapore 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  • Stan Hok-Wui Wong
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Government and Public AdministrationChinese University of Hong KongShatinHong Kong SAR

Personalised recommendations