Advertisement

Augmented Reality and IoT

  • Gitanjali Rahul ShindeEmail author
  • Prashant Shantaram Dhotre
  • Parikshit Narendra Mahalle
  • Nilanjan Dey
Chapter
  • 14 Downloads
Part of the SpringerBriefs in Applied Sciences and Technology book series (BRIEFSAPPLSCIENCES)

Abstract

The technology is taking a brisk pace that the things which were not possible yesterday are possible now. Looking at the recent developments like virtual reality (VR) and augmented reality (AR), it is possible to develop several applications that deal with virtual space and physical space. The physical space around the user is a three dimensional (3D). However, traditional devices can show two-dimensional (2D) images.

References

  1. 1.
    Sutherland IE (1968) A head-mounted three dimensional display. In: Proceedings of American federation of information processing societies (AFIPS), pp 757–764Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Lee K (2012) Augmented reality in education and training. Techtrends: Link Res Pract Improve Learn 56(2):13–21Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Azuma R, Baillot Y, Behringer R, Feiner S, Julier S, Mac-Intyre B (2001) Recent advances in augmented reality. IEEE Comput Graph Appl 21(6):34–47Google Scholar
  4. 4.
  5. 5.
    Henderson S, Feiner S (2017) Augmented reality for maintenance and repair (ARMAR). http://graphics.cs.columbia.edu/projects/armar
  6. 6.
    Curran K, McFadden D, Devlin R (2011) The role of augmented reality within ambient intelligence. Int J Ambient Comput Intell (IJACI) 3(2):16–34CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Hsu YS, Lin YH, Yang B (2017) Impact of augmented reality lessons on students’ STEM interest. Res Pract Technol Enhanc Learn 12(1):1–14CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
  9. 9.
  10. 10.
  11. 11.
  12. 12.
  13. 13.
    Casas S, Olanda R, Dey N (2017) Motion cueing algorithms: a review: algorithms, evaluation and tuning. Int J Virtual Augment Real (IJVAR) 1(1):90–106CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Molina B (2016) ‘Pokémon Go’ fastest mobile game to 10 M downloads, USA Today, 20 July 2016. www.usatoday.com/story/tech/gaming/2016/07/20/pokemon-go-fastest-mobile-game-10m-downloads/87338366
  15. 15.
    Newton C (2017) Snapchat adds world lenses to further its push into augmented reality, The Verge, 18 Apr 2017. www.theverge.com/2017/4/18/15333130/snapchat-world-lenses-something-new-for-facebook-to-copy
  16. 16.
    Carmigniani J, Furht B, Anisetti M, Ceravolo P, Damiani E, Ivkovic M (2011) Augmented reality technologies, systems and applications. Multimed Tools Appl 51(1):341–377CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Kato H, Billinghurst M, Poupyrev I, Imamoto K, Tachibana K (2000) Virtual object manipulation on a table-top AR environment. IEEEGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Van Krevelen D, Poelman R (2007) Augmented reality: technologies, applications and limitationsGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Barakonyi I, Fahmy T, Schmalstieg D (2004) Remote collaboration using augmented reality videoconferencing. In: Proceedings of graphics interface 2004, Canadian human-computer communications society, pp 89–96Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Lee J-Y, Lee S-H, Park H-M, Lee S-K, Choi J-S, Kwon J-S (2010) Design and implementation of a wearable AR annotation system using gaze interaction. In: International conference on consumer electronics (ICCE), digest of technical papers, pp 185–186Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Nishimura K (2004) ARW framework and intelligent character agent. IPSJ SIG Tech Rep 2004(28):95–100 (in Japanese)Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Atzori L, Iera A, Morabito G (2010) The Internet of Things: a survey. Comput Netw 54(15):2787–2805CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Ajanki A et al (2010) An augmented reality interface to contextual information. J Virtual Real 15:1–13Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Hazlewood WR, Coyle L (2009) On ambient information systems: challenges of design and evaluation. Int J Ambient Comput Intell (IJACI) 1(2):1–12CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Park H, Kim B, Ko Y, Lee D (2011) InterX: a service interoperability gateway for heterogeneous smart objects. In: 2011 IEEE international conference on pervasive computing and communications workshops (PERCOM 2011 workshops), Mar 2011, pp 233–238Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    National Intelligence Council, Disruptive Civil Technologies—six technologies with potential impacts on US interests out to 2025 –Conference Report CR 2008–07, Apr 2008, http://www.dni.gov/nic/NIC_home.html
  27. 27.
    Texas Instruments, CC2538 powerful wireless microcontroller system-on-chip for 2.4-GHz IEEE 802.15.4, 6LoWPAN, and ZigBee Applications. Available at: http://www.ti.com/lit/ds/symlink/cc2538.pdf
  28. 28.
    Raspberry Pi platform. Available at: http://www.adafruit.com/pdfs
  29. 29.
    Arduino platform. Available at: https://www.arduino.cc/
  30. 30.
    BeagleBone platform. Available at: http://beagleboard.org/bone
  31. 31.
    TinyOS Operating System. Available at: http://www.tinyos.net/
  32. 32.
    FreeRTOS Operating System. Available at: http://www.freertos.org/
  33. 33.
    Watteyne T, Vilajosana X, Kerkez B, Chraim F, Weekly K, Wang Q, Glaser S, Pister K (2012) OpenWSN: a standards-based low-power wireless development environment. Trans Emerg Tel Tech 23:480493.  https://doi.org/10.1002/ett.2558CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Couderc P, Banâtre M (2003) Ambient computing applications: an experience with the SPREAD approach. In: Proceedings of the 36th annual Hawaii international conference on system sciences, Jan 2003. IEEE, p 9Google Scholar
  35. 35.
    Fang H, Dan X, Shaowu S (2013) On the application of the Internet of Things in the field of medical and health care. In: Green computing and communications (GreenCom), 2013 IEEE and Internet of Things (iThings/CPSCom), IEEE international conference on and IEEE cyber, physical and social computing, 20–23 Aug 2013, pp 2053–2058.  https://doi.org/10.1109/greencom-ithings-cpscom.2013.384
  36. 36.
    Sudha MR, Sriraghav K, Jacob SG, Manisha S (2017) Approaches and applications of virtual reality and gesture recognition: a review. Int J Ambient Comput Intell (IJACI) 8(4):1–18CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Zanella A, Bui N, Castellani A, Vangelista L, Zorzi M (2014) Internet of Things for smart cities. Internet of Things J IEEE 1(1):22–32.  https://doi.org/10.1109/JIOT.2014.2306328CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Biswas A, Dutta S, Dey N, Azar AT (2014) A Kinect-less augmented reality approach to real-time tag-less virtual trial room simulation. Int J Serv Sci Manage Eng Technol (IJSSMET) 5(4):13–28Google Scholar
  39. 39.
    Clements P, Kazman R, Klein M (2002) Evaluating software architectures: methods and case studies. Addison Wesley, BostonGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Craig AB (2013) Understanding augmented reality: concepts and applications, NewnesGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Ronak Dipakkumar G, Patel DS (2018) Virtual reality–opportunities and challenges. Virtual Real 5(01)Google Scholar
  42. 42.
    Cubillo J, Martin S, Castro M, Boticki I (2015) Preparing augmented reality learning content should be easy: UNED ARLE—an authoring tool for augmented reality learning environments. Comput Appl Eng Educ 23(5):778–789CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2021

Authors and Affiliations

  • Gitanjali Rahul Shinde
    • 1
    Email author
  • Prashant Shantaram Dhotre
    • 2
  • Parikshit Narendra Mahalle
    • 1
  • Nilanjan Dey
    • 3
  1. 1.Department of Computer EngineeringSTES’s Smt. Kashibai Navale College of EngineeringPuneIndia
  2. 2.Department of Information TechnologyJSPM’s Rajarshi Shahu College of Engineering (An Autonomous Institute)PuneIndia
  3. 3.Department of Information TechnologyTechno India College of TechnologyKolkataIndia

Personalised recommendations