Advertisement

Decentralized E-Learning Marketplace: Managing Authorship and Tracking Access to Learning Materials Using Blockchain

  • Patrick OchejaEmail author
  • Brendan Flanagan
  • Hiroaki Ogata
Conference paper
  • 21 Downloads
Part of the Communications in Computer and Information Science book series (CCIS, volume 1227)

Abstract

The difficulty in protecting and enforcing Intellectual Property (IP) rights has been a major obstacle to sharing intellectual works in digital forms. In this work, we present a prototype design for a decentralized e-learning market-place where teachers, authorized publishers and authors can publish their learning materials, establish conditions for allowing access, and grant or revoke access based on adherence or infringement of their rights. Using the Blockchain of Learning Logs (BOLL) and a digital book reader (BookRoll), we demonstrate how authors can be empowered to deploy smart contracts that protect and enforce these rights on their intellectual works in a distributed manner. We particularly use the blockchain in order to enable trust, trace-ability, rights protection, transparency and collaboration between authors and users of their work with no third party interference. Finally, we examine the implications of our proposed design, its limitations and directions for future work.

Keywords

Intellectual Property Copyright elearning Education privacy Security Blockchain Smart contract BOLL Bookroll 

Notes

Acknowledgement

This work was partly supported by JSPS Grant-in-Aid for Scientific Research (S)16H06304 and NEDO Special Innovation Program on AI and Big Data 18102059-0.

References

  1. 1.
    May, C.: World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO): Resurgence and the Development Agenda. Routledge, Abingdon (2006)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Anderson, A., et al.: Extensible access control markup language (xacml) version 1.0, OASIS (2003)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Lorch, M., Proctor, S., Lepro, R., Kafura, D., Shah, S.: First experiences using XACML for access control in distributed systems. In: Proceedings of the 2003 ACM Workshop on XML Security, pp. 25–37 (2003)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Cantor, S., Scavo, T.: Shibboleth architecture. Protoc. Prof. 10, 16 (2005)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Zhu, Y., Qin, Y., Zhou, Z., Song, X., Liu, G., Chu, W.C.: Digital asset management with distributed permission over blockchain and attribute-based access control. In: 2018 IEEE International Conference on Services Computing (SCC), pp. 193–200 (2018)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Janowicz, K., et al.: On the prospects of blockchain and distributed ledger technologies for open science and academic publishing. In: Semantic Web. Preprint, pp. 1–11 (2018)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Hoffman, M.R., Ibáñez, L., Fryer, H., Simperl, E.: Smart papers: dynamic publications on the blockchain. In: European Semantic Web Conference, pp. 304–318 (2018)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Ocheja, P., Flanagan, B., Ogata, H.: Connecting decentralized learning records: a blockchain based learning analytics platform. In: LAK 2018: Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Learning Analytics and Knowledge, pp. 265–269 (2018)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Ocheja, P., Flanagan, B., Ogata, H.: Managing lifelong learning records through blockchain. Res. Pract. Technol. Enhan. Learn. 14(1), 4 (2019)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Foroughi, A., Albin, M., Gillard, S.: Digital rights management: a delicate balance between protection and accessibility. J. Inf. Sci. 28(5), 389–395 (2000)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Chuang, J.C., Sirbu, M.A.: Network delivery of information goods: optimal pricing of articles and subscriptions. In: Proceedings Internet Publishing Beyond: Economic Digital Information Intellectual Property. Kennedy School of Government, Harvard University, Cambridge (2000)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    National Research Council and others: The digital dilemma: Intellectual property in the in-formation age, National Academies Press (2000)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Liu, Q., Safavi-Naini, R., Sheppard, N.P.: Digital rights management for content distribution. In: Proceedings of the Australasian Information Security Workshop Conference on ACSW Frontiers, vol. 21, pp. 49–58 (2003)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Hu, V.C., et al.: Guide to attribute based access control (ABAC) definition and considerations (draft). NIST Spec. Publ. 800(162) (2013)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Emanuel, E.J.: Online education: MOOCs taken by educated few. Nature 503(7476), 342 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Abelson, H.: The Creation of OpenCourseWare at MIT. J. Sci. Educ. Technol. 17(2), 164–174 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Thompson, C.: How Khan Academy is changing the rules of education. Wired Mag. 126, 1–5 (2011)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  • Patrick Ocheja
    • 1
    Email author
  • Brendan Flanagan
    • 2
  • Hiroaki Ogata
    • 2
  1. 1.Graduate School of InformaticsKyoto UniversitySakyo-Ku, KyotoJapan
  2. 2.Academic Center for Computing and Media Studies, Kyoto UniversitySakyo-Ku, KyotoJapan

Personalised recommendations