Research on Multimedia Community Teaching Platform into Problem-Based Learning (PBL) - An Empirical Study on the Teaching Mode of Creative Innovation and Entrepreneurship Courses for Technical and Vocational Students

  • Ming-Hsiu Liu
  • Ta-Feng Tseng
  • Ron Chuen YehEmail author
  • Pansy Chung
Conference paper
Part of the Communications in Computer and Information Science book series (CCIS, volume 1227)


Under the project of technical and vocational reengineering, Teachers’ teaching research and teaching practice is an indispensable step, facing the rapid change of industrial environment, Teachers use of the network community and the ability to solve the problem have become the important factors to shorten the learning gap. The purpose of this study is to explore the application of network community and problem-based learning effectiveness and learning attitude and learning satisfaction. This paper aims to understand the teaching outcomes of the network community application and problem-based learning model, and to construct relevant teaching strategies, teaching materials and teaching activities. According to the results, this study found that the integration of Google Hangouts and PBL has obvious effects on the learning of the creativity, innovation and entrepreneurship course. In particular, there are obvious differences in overall academic performance. Secondly, students’ learning attitude is also better because of real-time discussion through Google Hangouts. This result reflects that the multimedia teaching method and grouping design strategy can indeed improve the learning effect of students.


Problem-based learning Innovative and create business Learning outcome 


  1. 1.
    Barrows, H.S., Tamblyn, R.M.: Problem-Based Learning: An Approach to Medical Education. Springer, New York (1980)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Barrows, H.S.: The essentials of problem-based learning. J. Dent. Educ. 62(9), 630–633 (1988)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Watson, D., Clark, L.A.: Emotions, moods, traits, and temperaments: conceptual distinctions and empirical findings. Nat. Emot. Fundam. Questions, 89–93 (1994)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Kammann, R., Flett, R.: Affectometer 2: a scale to measure current level of general happiness. Aust. J. Psychol. 35(2), 259–265 (1983)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Garland, K.J., Noyes, J.M.: Computer attitude scales: How relevant today? Comput. Hum. Behav. 24(2), 563–575 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Hwang, G.J., Chang, H.F.: A formative assessment-based mobile learning approach to improving the learning attitudes and achievements of students. Comput. Educ. 56(4), 1023–1031 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Paas, F., Renkl, A., Sweller, J.: Cognitive load theory and instructional design: recent developments. Educ. Psychol. 38(1), 1–4 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Huang, S.H., Huang, Y.M., Wu, T.T., Chen, H.R., Chang, S.M.: Problem-based learning effectiveness on micro-blog and blog for students: a case study. Interact. Learn. Environ. 24(6), 1334–1354 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Sung, H.Y., Hwang, G.J., Chen, S.F.: Effects of embedding a problem-posing-based learning guiding strategy into interactive e-books on students’ learning performance and higher order thinking tendency. Interact. Learn. Environ. 27(3), 389–401 (2019)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  • Ming-Hsiu Liu
    • 1
  • Ta-Feng Tseng
    • 2
  • Ron Chuen Yeh
    • 1
    Email author
  • Pansy Chung
    • 1
  1. 1.MeiHo UniversityPingtungTaiwan
  2. 2.Zhaoqing UniversityZhaoqingChina

Personalised recommendations