Advertisement

Spatio-Temporal Evolution of Environmental Efficiency of Construction Land in Yangtze River Economic Zone

  • Huimin XuEmail author
Conference paper
  • 42 Downloads
Part of the Communications in Computer and Information Science book series (CCIS, volume 1228)

Abstract

With the rapid expansion of construction land in Yangtze River Economic Zone, problems such as shortage of land resources, low utilization efficiency and serious environmental pollution have become increasingly important. This study used Data Envelopment Analysis (DEA) model of super efficiency and Malmquist index to measure the environmental efficiency of construction land in Yangtze River Economic Zone from 2006 to 2016, and analyzed the spatial and temporal evolution characteristics, by using sulfur dioxide, carbon dioxide emissions and PM 2.5 as the environmental cost. It was found that the overall environmental efficiency of construction land in Yangtze River Economic Zone is low, which is smaller than 1. The average efficiency of the eastern coastal economic zones is the highest, which is larger than 1. In addition, from the perspective of the change trend of the environmental efficiency, Shanghai and Jiangsu have witnessed rapid growth, and technological progress is the main driving force. However, some provinces (e.g. Zhejiang, Jiangxi, Hunan and Anhui) also experienced decrease of technical efficiency. The findings provide scientific support for controlling the intensity and allocation of regional construction land under the background of ecological civilization in Yangtze River Economic Zone.

Keywords

Construction land Environmental efficiency Regional difference Super-efficiency DEA Malmquist index 

Notes

Acknowledgement

This research was supported by Youth Fund of Wuhan Donghu University under grant no. 2018dhsk004.

References

  1. 1.
    Liu, Y.J., Geng, H.: Regional competition in china under the price distortion of construction land: a study based on a two-regime spatial Durbin model. China World Econ. 27(4), 104–126 (2019)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Qu, Y.B., Jiang, G.H., Tian, Y.Y., Shang, R., Wei, S.W., Li, Y.L.: Urban - Rural Construction Land Transition (URCLT) in Shandong Province of China: features measurement and mechanism exploration. Habitat Int. 86, 101–115 (2019)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Yang, Z.W., Chen, Y.B., Qian, Q.L., Wu, Z.F., Zheng, Z.H., Huang, Q.Y.: The coupling relationship between construction land expansion and high-temperature area expansion in China’s three major urban agglomerations. Int. J. Remote Sens. 40(17), 6680–6699 (2019)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Chen, Y., Chen, Z., Xu, G., Tian, Z.: Built-up land efficiency in urban China: insights from the general land use plan (2006–2020). Habitat Int. 51, 31–38 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Zitti, M., Ferrara, C., Perini, L., Carlucci, M., Salvati, L.: Long-term urban growth and land use efficiency in Southern Europe: implications for sustainable land management. Sustainability 7(3), 3359–3385 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Cui, X.G., Fang, C.L., Wang, Z.B., Bao, C.: Spatial relationship of high-speed transportation construction and land-use efficiency and its mechanism: case study of Shandong Peninsula urban agglomeration. J. Geograph. Sci. 29(4), 549–562 (2019)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Liu, Y.S., Zhang, Z.W., Zhou, Y.: Efficiency of construction land allocation in China: an econometric analysis of panel data. Land Use Policy 74, 261–272 (2018)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Ye, Y.Y., Li, S.F., Zhang, H.O., Su, Y.X., Wu, Q.T., Wang, C.J.: Spatial-temporal dynamics of the economic efficiency of construction land in the pearl river delta megalopolis from 1998 to 2012. Sustainability 10(1), 63 (2018)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Zhang, Y., Jin, H.: Research on efficiency of urban construction land and the drive mechanism in the Mid-Yangtze river. Resour. Sci. 37(7), 1384–1393 (2015)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Jing, S., Zhang, J.: Study on the convergence of Inter-provincial energy and environment efficiency in China. J. Shanxi Univ. Finan. Econ. 40(1), 1–11 (2018)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Wu, Z., Tang, Q., Wang, Y.: Environmental efficiency evaluation of urban construction land in Jiangsu-Zhejiang-Shanghai area: based on three stage DEA and Bootstrap-DEA methods. Mod. Urban Res. 1, 90–99 (2017)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Andersen, P., Petersen, N.C.: A procedure for ranking efficient units in data envelopment analysis. Manag. sci. 39(10), 1261–1264 (1993)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Malmquist, S.: Index numbers and indifference surfaces. Trabajos de Estadistica 4(2), 209–242 (1953)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Feng, M., Li, X.Y.: Evaluating the efficiency of industrial environmental regulation in China: a three-stage data envelopment analysis approach. J. Clean. Prod. 242, 118535 (2020)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Xie, J.H., Zhou, S.C., Chen, Y.: Integrated data envelopment analysis methods for measuring technical, environmental, and eco-efficiencies. J. Clean. Prod. 238, 117939 (2019)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Zhou, Z.X., Wu, H.Q., Song, P.F.: Measuring the resource and environmental efficiency of industrial water consumption in China: a non-radial directional distance function. J. Clean. Prod. 240, 118169 (2019)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Zhong, Y., Lin, A.W., Zhou, Z.G.: Evolution of the pattern of spatial expansion of urban land use in the poyang lake ecological economic zone. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 16(1), 117 (2019)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Economics SchoolWuhan Donghu UniversityWuhanChina

Personalised recommendations