Advertisement

Defining Social Media…It’s Complicated

  • Harry T. Dyer
Chapter
  • 22 Downloads
Part of the Cultural Studies and Transdisciplinarity in Education book series (CSTE, volume 11)

Abstract

This chapter deals with the seemingly simple but surprisingly complex task of defining social media. We begin with a discussion of what social media isn’t, working through some of the common and pervasive myths around social media and young people, before moving on to discuss some of the difficulties in offering a clear definition of social media. Given the continuing evolving nature of platforms, including the addition of new ways of interacting, the ever-growing diverse ways of engaging with and through platforms beyond social interaction, and the use of various social features on a wide array of platforms that may not traditionally be considered overly social spaces, we discuss where (if anywhere) the boundaries of social media sit. We then move on to discuss the importance of a platform-specific approach to understanding social media and then finally reflect on data drawn from a series of interviews with young people to discuss how they understand, define, and use social media.

Keywords

Social media Social networking Digital natives Moral panic Young people 

References

  1. Agosto, D. E., & Abbas, J. (2013). Youth and Online Social Networking. What do we know so far? In J. Beheshti & A. Large (Eds.), The information behavior of a new generation: Children and teens in the 21st century (pp. 117–142). Plymouth: Scarecrow Press.Google Scholar
  2. Anderson, C. A., & Dill, K. E. (2000). Video games and aggressive thoughts, feelings, and behavior in the laboratory and in life. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 78(4), 772.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Anderson, M., & Jiang, J. (2018) Teens, social media and technology 2018. Pew Research Center, May 2018. Accessed 08/2019: https://www.pewinternet.org/wp-content/uploads/sites/9/2018/05/PI_2018.05.31_TeensTech_FINAL.pdf
  4. Antheunis, M. L., Schouten, A. P., & Krahmer, E. (2014). The role of social networking sites in early adolescents’ social lives. The Journal of Early Adolescence, 36(3), 1–24.Google Scholar
  5. Ariel, Y., & Avidar, R. (2015). Information, interactivity, and social media. Atlantic Journal of Communication, 23(1), 19–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Barker, V., & Rodriguez, N. S. (2019). This is who I am: The selfie as a personal and social identity marker. International Journal of Communication, 13, 1143–1166.Google Scholar
  7. Barnes, R. (2015). Understanding the affective investment produced through commenting on Australian alternative journalism website New Matilda. New Media and Society, 17(5), 810–826.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Baudrillard, J. (1994). Simulacra and simulation. Michigan: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
  9. Bayne, S., & Ross, J. (2011). ‘Digital Native’and ‘Digital Immigrant’ discourses. In R. Land & S. Bayne (Eds.), Digital difference: Perspectives on online learning (pp. 159–169). Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Beer, D. (2018). The data gaze: Capitalism, power and perception. London: Sage.Google Scholar
  11. Black, E. W., Mezzina, K., & Thompson, L. A. (2016). Anonymous social media – Understanding the content and context of Yik Yak. Computers in Human Behavior, 57, 17–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Boulianne, S. (2015). Social media use and participation: A meta-analysis of current research. Information, Communication and Society, 18(5), 524–538.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Bowler, L., Knobel, C., & Mattern, E. (2015). From cyberbullying to Well-being: A narrative-based participatory approach to values-oriented design for social media. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 66(6), 1274–1293.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. boyd, d. (2015). Social media: A phenomenon to be analyzed. Social Media + Society, 2015(April–June), 1–2.Google Scholar
  15. boyd, d., & Ellison, N. B. (2008). Social network sites: Definition, history, and scholarship. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 13(1), 210–230.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Bucher, T., & Helmond, A. (2018). The affordances of social media platforms. In J. Burgess, T. Poell, & A. Marwick (Eds.), The Sage handbook of social media (pp. 223–253). London: SAGE.Google Scholar
  17. Byron, P., Robards, B., Hanckel, B., Vivienne, S., & Churchill, B. (2019). “Hey, I’m having these experiences”: Tumblr use and young People’s queer (dis) connections. International Journal of Communication, 13, 2239–2259.Google Scholar
  18. Canter, L. (2013). The misconception of online comment threads: Content and control on local newspaper websites. Journalism Practice, 7(5), 604–619.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Carpio, G. G. (2018). Racial projections: Cyberspace, public space, and the digital divide. Information, Communication and Society, 21(2), 174–190.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Carr, C. T., & Hayes, R. A. (2015). Social media: Defining, developing, and divining. Atlantic Journal of Communication, 23(1), 46–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Cho, D. & Acquisti, A. (2013). The more social cues, the less trolling? An empirical study of online commenting behavior. In Proceedings of the 12th Workshop on the Economics of Information Security (WEIS 2013), March 6th 2013. Washington, DC.Google Scholar
  22. Cohen, S. (1972). Folk devils and moral panics. Abingdon: Routledge.Google Scholar
  23. Coles, B. A., & West, M. (2016). Weaving the internet together: Imagined communities in newspaper comment threads. Computers in Human Behavior, 60, 44–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Couldry, N. (2012). Media, society, world: Social theory and digital media practice. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
  25. Curran, J., Fenton, N., & Freedman, D. (2016). Misunderstanding the internet. London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Dabbagh, N., Benson, A. D., Denham, A., Joseph, R., Al-Freih, M., Zgheib, G., & Guo, Z. (2015). Learning technologies and globalization: Pedagogical frameworks and applications. London: Springer.Google Scholar
  27. Daniels, J., Gregory, K., & Cottom, T. M. (Eds.). (2017). Digital sociologies (pp. 75–99). London: Policy.Google Scholar
  28. Davis, J. L. (2016). Identity theory in a digital age. In J. E. Stets & R. T. Serpe (Eds.), New directions in identity theory and research (pp. 137–164). Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Davis, J. L., & Jurgenson, N. (2014). Context collapse: Theorizing context collusions and collisions. Information, Communication and Society, 17(4), 476–485.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Duguay, S. (2016). Lesbian, gay, bisexual, trans, and queer visibility through selfies: Comparing platform mediators across ruby Rose’s Instagram and vine presence. Social Media+ Society, 2(2), 1–16.Google Scholar
  31. Duke, L. M., & Asher, A. D. (Eds.). (2012). College libraries and student culture: What we now know. Chicago: American Library Association.Google Scholar
  32. Dyer, H. T. (2015). All the Web’s a stage: The effects of design and modality on youth performances of identity. In Sociological studies of children and youth (Technology and youth: Growing up in a digital world) (Vol. 19, pp. 213–242).Google Scholar
  33. Dyer, H. T. (2016). Interactivity, social media, and superman: How comic books can help us understand and conceptualize interactivity online. In J. Daniels, K. Gregory, & T. M. Cottom (Eds.), Digital sociologies (pp. 75–99). London: Policy.Google Scholar
  34. Dyer, H. T. (2017) Online anonymity: The good, the bad, and the ugly. HarryTDyer.com, January 2017. Accessed 08/2019: https://harrytdyer.com/2017/01/04/online-anonymity-the-good-the-bad-and-the-ugly/
  35. Ellison, N. B., Blackwell, L., Lampe, C., & Trieu, P. (2016). “The question exists, but you Don’t exist with it”: Strategic anonymity in the social lives of adolescents. Social Media+ Society, 2016(October–December), 1–13.Google Scholar
  36. Goldman, S., Booker, A., & McDermott, M. (2008). Mixing the digital, social, and cultural: Learning, identity, and agency in youth participation. In D. Buckingham (Ed.), Youth, identity, and digital media (pp. 185–206). Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  37. Guidry, J., Zhang, Y., Jin, Y., & Parrish, C. (2016). Portrayals of depression on Pinterest and why public relations practitioners should care. Public Relations Review, 42(1), 232–236.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Hargittai, E. (2018). The digital reproduction of inequality. In D. B. Grusky & S. Szelenyi (Eds.), The inequality reader (pp. 660–670). New York: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Hermida, A., Fletcher, F., Korell, D., & Logan, D. (2012). SHARE, LIKE, RECOMMEND: Decoding the social media news consumer. Journalism Studies, 13(5–6), 815–824.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Hilbert, M., & Lopez, P. (2011). The World’s technological capacity to store, communicate, and compute information. Science, 332(6025), 60–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Hackforth, R. (1973). Plato: Phaedrus, translated with an introduction and commentary by Hackforth. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  42. Hall, C., & Zarro, M. (2012). Social curation on the website. Pinterest.com. Proceedings of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 49(1), 1–9.Google Scholar
  43. Hall, G. A. (1922). Flapper Americana Novissima. Atlantic Monthly, 129(June 1922), 771–780.Google Scholar
  44. Helsper, E. J., & Eynon, R. (2010). Digital natives: Where is the evidence? British Educational Research Journal, 36(3), 503–520.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Herring, S. C., & Kapidzic, S. (2015). Teens, gender, and self-presentation in social media. In J. D. Wright (Ed.), International encyclopedia of the social and behavioral sciences (pp. 146–152). Oxford: Elsevier.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Hill, R., Beynon-Davies, P., & Williams, M. D. (2008). Older people and internet engagement. Information Technology and People, 21(3), 244–266.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Hille, S., & Bakker, P. (2014). Engaging the social news user: Comments on news sites and Facebook. Journalism Practice, 8(5), 563–572.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Hodkinson, P. (2017). Bedrooms and beyond: Youth, identity and privacy on social network sites. New Media and Society, 19(2), 272–288.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Hughes, D. J., Rowe, M., Batey, M., & Lee, A. (2012). A tale of two sites: Twitter vs. Facebook and the personality predictors of social media usage. Computers in Human Behavior, 28(2), 561–569.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Irwin, S. O. (2016). Media ecology and the internet of things. Explorations in Media Ecology, 15(2), 159–171.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Jones, K., & Glynn, M. (2019). How children use social media for brand interactions. Young Consumers, 20(2), 91–108.Google Scholar
  52. Jones, C., & Shao, B. (2011). The net generation and digital natives: Implications for higher education. York: Higher Education Academy.Google Scholar
  53. Judd, T. (2018). The rise and fall (?) of the digital natives. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 34(5), 99–119.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Karapanos, E., Teixeira, P., & Gouveia, R. (2016). Need fulfillment and experiences on social media: A case on Facebook and WhatsApp. Computers in Human Behavior, 55, 888–897.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Katz, J. E., & Crocker, E. T. (2015). Selfies and photo messaging as visual conversation: Reports from the United States, United Kingdom and China. International Journal of Communication, 9, 1861–1872.Google Scholar
  56. Karimov, F. P., Brengman, M., & Van Hove, L. (2011). The effect of website design dimensions on initial trust: A synthesis of the empirical literature. Journal of Electronic Commerce Research, 12(4), 272–301.Google Scholar
  57. Khazaei, T., Xiao, L., Mercer, R., & Khan, A. (2016). Privacy behaviour and profile configuration in twitter. In Proceedings of the 25th international conference companion on world wide web. April 11–15, 2016, Montréal (pp. 575–580).Google Scholar
  58. Kim, B. K. (2005). Internationalizing the internet: The co-evolution of influence and technology. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Kitchin, R. (2013). Big data and human geography opportunities, challenges and risks. Dialogues in Human Geography, 3(3), 262–267.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Korhan, O., & Ersoy, M. (2016). Usability and functionality factors of the social network site application users from the perspective of uses and gratification theory. Quality and Quantity, 50(4), 1799–1816.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Kowert, R., Domahidi, E., & Quandt, T. (2016). Networking and other social aspects of technology use: Past developments, present impact, and future considerations. In D. Faust, K. Faust, & M. N. Potenza (Eds.), Oxford handbook of digital technologies and mental health. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  62. Kunze, P. (2014). Kidding around: Children, comedy, and social media. Comedy Studies, 5(1), 2–11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Kwak, H., Lee, C., Park, H., & Moon, S. (2010). What is twitter, a social network or a news media? In 19th international conference on world wide web. April 26–30, North Carolina (pp. 591–600).Google Scholar
  64. Lancaster, K. (1994). Do role-playing games promote crime, Satanism and suicide among players as critics claim? Journal of Popular Culture, 28, 67–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Lange, P. G. (2007). Publicly private and privately public: Social networking on YouTube. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 13(1), 361–380.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Leavitt, A., & Clark, J. A. (2014, April). Upvoting hurricane Sandy: Event-based news production processes on a social news site. In Proceedings of the 32nd annual ACM conference on human factors in computing systems (pp. 1495–1504). ACM.Google Scholar
  67. Lefebvre, H. (1991). The production of space. (D. Nicholson-Smith, Trans.). Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar
  68. Leiner, B. M., Cerf, V. G., Clark, D. D., Kahn, R. E., Kleinrock, L., Lynch, D. C., Postel, J., Roberts, L. G., & Wolff, S. (2009). A brief history of the internet. [Online]. Accesses 08/2019: https://arxiv.org/html/cs/9901011?
  69. Lenhart, A. (2015). Teen, social media and technology overview 2015. Pew Research Center, April 2015. Accessed 08/2019: https://www.pewresearch.org/wp-content/uploads/sites/9/2015/04/PI_TeensandTech_Update2015_0409151.pdf
  70. Light, B., Burgess, J., & Duguay, S. (2018). The walkthrough method: An approach to the study of apps. New Media and Society, 20(3), 881–900.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Livingstone, S., Mascheroni, G., & Staksrud, E. (2018). European research on children’s internet use: Assessing the past and anticipating the future. New Media and Society, 20(3), 1103–1122.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Livingstone, S., & Ólafsson, K. (2018). When do parents think their child is ready to use the internet independently? Technical Report. LSE, May 2018. Accessed 08/2019: http://eprints.lse.ac.uk/87953/1/Livingstone_Parenting%20Digital%20Survey%20Report%202_Published.pdf
  73. Malvini Redden, S., & Way, A. K. (2017). ‘Adults don’t understand’: Exploring how teens use dialectical frameworks to navigate webs of tensions in online life. Journal of Applied Communication Research, 45(1), 21–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Manosevitch, E., & Walker, D. (2009). Reader comments to online opinion journalism: A space of public deliberation. In 10th international symposium on online journalism, Austin, TX, 17–18 April.Google Scholar
  75. Mararike, S., Harper, T., & Gilligan, A. (2018) Drill, the ‘demonic’ music linked to rise in youth murders. April 8th 2018. The Times. Accessed 08/2019: https://www.thetimes.co.uk/article/drill-the-demonic-music-linked-to-rise-in-youth-murders-0bkbh3csk
  76. Marsh, J., Plowman, L., Yamada-Rice, D., Bishop, J., & Scott, F. (2016). Digital play: A new classification. Early Years, 1–12.Google Scholar
  77. Massanari, A. (2017). # Gamergate and the Fappening: How Reddit’s algorithm, governance, and culture support toxic technocultures. New Media and Society, 19(3), 329–346.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. Mazzoni, E., & Iannone, M. (2014). From high school to university: Impact of social networking sites on social capital in the transitions of emerging adults. British Journal of Educational Technology, 45(2), 303–315.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  79. McRobbie, A., & Thornton, S. L. (1995). Rethinking ‘Moral Panic’ for multi-mediated social worlds. The British Journal of Sociology, 46(4), 559–574.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  80. Mihelj, S., Leguina, A., & Downey, J. (2019). Culture is digital: Cultural participation, diversity and the digital divide. New Media and Society, 21(7), 1465–1485.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  81. Miller, D. (2011). Tales from Facebook. London: Polity.Google Scholar
  82. Morgan, H. (2014). Using digital story projects to help students improve in reading and writing. Reading Improvement, 51(1), 20–26.Google Scholar
  83. O’Hara, K. P., Massimi, M., Harper, R., Rubens, S., & Morris, J. (2014, February). Everyday dwelling with WhatsApp. In Proceedings of the 17th ACM conference on computer supported cooperative work and social computing (pp. 1131–1143). ACM.Google Scholar
  84. Ophir, Y., Lipshits-Braziler, Y., & Rosenberg, H. (2019). New-media screen time is not (necessarily) linked to depression: Comments on Twenge, joiner, Rogers, and Martin (2018). Clinical Psychological Science, 1–5.Google Scholar
  85. Orben, A., & Przybylski, A. K. (2019). The association between adolescent Well-being and digital technology use. Nature Human Behaviour, 3, 173–182.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  86. Oz, M., Zheng, P., & Chen, G. M. (2018). Twitter versus Facebook: Comparing incivility, impoliteness, and deliberative attributes. New Media and Society, 20(9), 3400–3419.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  87. Pangrazio, L. (2018). Young People’s literacies in the digital age: Continuities, conflicts and contradictions. London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  88. Pearson, G. (1983). Hooligan: A history of respectable fears. Basingstoke: Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  89. Perrin, A. (2015). Social networking usage: 2005–2015. Pew Research Center, October 2015. Accessed 08/2019: http://www.pewinternet.org/2015/10/08/2015/Social-Networking-Usage-2005-2015/
  90. Perrin, A., & Anderson, M. (2019) Share of U.S. adults using social media, including Facebook, is mostly unchanged since 2018. PEW Research Center, April 2019. Accessed 08/2019: https://www.pewresearch.org/fact-tank/2019/04/10/share-of-u-s-adults-using-social-media-including-facebook-is-mostly-unchanged-since-2018/
  91. Postigo, H. (2016). The socio-technical architecture of digital labor: Converting play into YouTube money. New Media and Society, 18(2), 332–349.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  92. Prensky, M. (2001). Digital natives, digital immigrants part 1. On the Horizon, 9(5), 1–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  93. Qualman, E. (2009). Socialnomics: How social media transforms the Way we live and do business. Hoboken: Wiley.Google Scholar
  94. Rieder, B., Matamoros-Fernández, A., & Coromina, Ò. (2018). From ranking algorithms to ‘ranking cultures’ investigating the modulation of visibility in YouTube search results. Convergence, 24(1), 50–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  95. Robards, B. (2014). Mediating experiences of “growing up” on Facebook’s timeline: Privacy, ephemerality and the reflexive project of self. In A. Bennett & B. Robards (Eds.), Mediated youth cultures (pp. 26–41). London: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  96. Rowe, I. (2015). Civility 2.0: A comparative analysis of incivility in online political discussion. Information, Communication and Society, 18(2), 121–138.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  97. Ruthfield, S. (1995). The Internet’s history and development: From wartime tool to fish-cam. Crossroads, 2(1), 2–4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  98. Safko, L. (2010). The social media bible: Tactics, tools, and strategies for business success. London: John Wiley and Sons.Google Scholar
  99. Salomon, I., & Brown, C. S. (2019). The selfie generation: Examining the relationship between social media use and early adolescent body image. The Journal of Early Adolescence, 39(4), 539–560.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  100. Schivinski, B., & Dabrowski, D. (2016). The effect of social media communication on consumer perceptions of brands. Journal of Marketing Communications, 22(2), 189–214.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  101. Seidman, G. (2013). Self-presentation and belonging on Facebook: How personality influences social media use and motivations. Personality and Individual Differences, 54(3), 402–407.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  102. Shah, N., & Abraham, S. (2009). Digital natives with a cause? A knowledge survey and framework. Humanist Institute for Cooperation with Developing Countries (Hivos) Report 2009. Accessed 08/2019: https://cis-india.org/digital-natives/blog/uploads/dnrep1
  103. Shirky, C. (2011). The political power of social media: Technology, the public sphere, and political change. Foreign Affairs, 90(1), 28–41.Google Scholar
  104. Şimşek, B., Abidin, C., & Brown, M. L. (2018). Musical. ly and microcelebrity among girls. In C. Abidin & M. L. Brown (Eds.), Microcelebrity around the globe, Emerald Publishing Limited (pp. 47–56). Bingley.Google Scholar
  105. Smith, A., & Anderson, M (2018) Social media use in 2018. Pew Research Center, March 2018. Accessed 08/2019: https://www.pewinternet.org/2018/03/01/social-media-use-in-2018/
  106. Smock, A. D., Ellison, N. B., Lampe, C., & Wohn, D. Y. (2011). Facebook as a toolkit: A uses and gratification approach to unbundling feature use. Computers in Human Behavior, 27(6), 2322–2329.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  107. Springhall, J. (1998). Youth, popular culture and moral panics: Penny gaffs to gangsta-rap, 1830–1996. Basingstoke: Macmillan International Higher Education.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  108. Stroud, N. J., Scacco, J. M., & Curry, A. L. (2016). The presence and use of interactive features on news websites. Digital Journalism, 4(3), 339–358.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  109. Syvertsen, T. (2017). Media resistance. Protest, dislike, abstention. Cham: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  110. Tarsa, R. (2015). Upvoting the exordium: Literacy practices of the digital interface. College English, 78(1), 12–33.Google Scholar
  111. Tekobbe, C. K. (2013). A site for fresh eyes: Pinterest’s challenge to “traditional” digital literacies. Information, Communication and Society, 16(3), 381–396.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  112. Toepfl, F., & Piwoni, E. (2015). Public spheres in interaction: Comment sections of news websites as counterpublic spaces. Journal of Communication, 65(3), 465–488.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  113. Turkle, S. (2011). Alone together: Why we expect more from technology and less from each other. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
  114. Twenge, J. M. (2019). More time on technology, less happiness? Associations between digital-media use and psychological Well-being. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 28(4), 372–379.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  115. Twenge, J. M., Martin, G. N., & Campbell, W. K. (2018). Decreases in psychological well-being among American adolescents after 2012 and links to screen time during the rise of smartphone technology. Emotion, 18(6), 765–780.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  116. Utz, S. (2015). The function of self-disclosure on social network sites: Not only intimate, but also positive and entertaining self-disclosures increase the feeling of connection. Computers in Human Behavior, 45, 1–10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  117. Valkenburg, P. M., & Peter, J. (2007). Preadolescents’ and adolescents’ online communication and their closeness to friends. Developmental Psychology, 43(2), 267–277.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  118. Van der Nagel, E., & Frith, J. (2015). Anonymity, pseudonymity, and the agency of online identity: Examining the social practices of r/Gonewild. First Monday, 20(3).Google Scholar
  119. Van Dijck, J., & Poell, T. (2013). Understanding social media logic. Media and Communication, 1(1), 2–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  120. Van Doorn, N. (2011). Digital spaces, material traces: How matter comes to matter in online performances of gender, sexuality and embodiment. Media, Culture and Society, 33(4), 531–547.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  121. Vickery, J. R. (2015). I don’t have anything to hide, but…’: The challenges and negotiations of social and mobile media privacy for non-dominant youth. Information, Communication and Society, 18(3), 281–294.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  122. Wang, J., Yu, C. T., Yu, P. S., Liu, B., & Meng, W. (2015). Diversionary comments under blog posts. Transactions on the Web, 9(4). Article 18, e1-34.Google Scholar
  123. Wartella, E., Rideout, V., Montague, H., Beaudoin-Ryan, L., & Lauricella, A. (2016). Teens, health and technology: A National Survey. Media and Communication, 4(3), 13–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  124. Waters, M. (2016). The public shaming of England’s first umbrella user. Atlas Obscura. July 2016. Accessed 08/2019: https://www.atlasobscura.com/articles/the-public-shaming-of-englands-first-umbrella-user
  125. Waterson, J. (2019) Viral ‘Momo challenge’ is a malicious hoax, say charities. The Guardian, 28th February 2019. Accessed 08/2019: https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2019/feb/28/viral-momo-challenge-is-a-malicious-hoax-say-charities
  126. Wood, M. A., Bukowski, W. M., & Lis, E. (2016). The digital self: How social media serves as a setting that shapes Youth’s emotional experiences. Adolescent Research Review, 1(2), 163–173.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  127. Wu, T. Y., & Atkin, D. J. (2018). To comment or not to comment: Examining the influences of anonymity and social support on one’s willingness to express in online news discussions. New Media and Society, 20(12), 4512–4532.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  128. Yang, C., & Brown, B. B. (2013). Motives for using Facebook, patterns of Facebook activities, and late adolescents’ social adjustment to college. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 42(3), 403–416.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  129. Zhou, Z., Su, C., Zhou, N., & Zhang, N. (2016). Becoming friends in online brand communities: Evidence from China. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 21(1), 69–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  • Harry T. Dyer
    • 1
  1. 1.University of East AngliaNorwichUK

Personalised recommendations