Advertisement

Developing a Conceptual Framework for Smart Teaching: Using VR to Teach Kids How to Save Lives

  • Tone Lise DahlEmail author
  • Siw Olsen Fjørtoft
  • Andreas D. Landmark
Conference paper
  • 33 Downloads
Part of the Smart Innovation, Systems and Technologies book series (SIST, volume 188)

Abstract

We describe a conceptual framework that teachers can utilize when embedding immersive virtual reality with HMDs in their classroom for educational purposes. The concept is based on an ongoing research project where an immersive virtual reality application is being produced and will be used in K-12 education for learning first aid. By using virtual reality, we redefine the way students learn first aid by exposing them to real-life scenarios in an immersive virtual environment where they feel a sense of presence, that otherwise would not have been possible due to resources, risks and ethical reasons. The conceptual framework we have developed is an attempt to close a gap between the focus on the benefits of this promising learning technology and the practical considerations and guidelines from a teacher’s perspective in an educational context. We believe that there is immense value in providing teachers with a framework they can use when embedding immersive virtual reality in the dynamic environment of classrooms.

Keywords

Smart teaching Pedagogical framework Virtual reality (VR) Head-mounted display (HMD) Educational technology First aid Immersive VR Smart education 

Notes

Acknowledgements

The ongoing research project (#296188) is funded by the Regional Research Fund Hovedstaden.

References

  1. 1.
    Blau, I., Shamir-Inbal, T.: Re-designed flipped learning model in an academic course: The role of co-creation and co-regulation. Comput. Edu. 114, 69–81 (2017).  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2017.07.014
  2. 2.
    Bucher, K., Blome, T., Rudolph, S., von Mammen, S.: VReanimate II: training first aid and reanimation in virtual reality. J. Comput. Edu (2018).  https://doi.org/10.1007/s40692-018-0121-1CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Böttiger, B.W., Bossaert, L.L., Castrén, M., Cimpoesu, D., Georgiou, M., Greif, R., Grünfeld, M., Lockey, A., Lott, C., Maconochie, I., Melieste, R., Monsieurs, K.G., Nolan, J.P., Perkins, G.D., Raffay, V., Schlieber, J., Semeraro, F., Soar, J., Truhlář, A., Van de Voorde, P., Wyllie, J., Wingen, S., et al.: Kids save lives—ERC position statement on school children education in CPR. Resuscitation, 105, A1–A3Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Fjørtoft, S.O., Thun, S., Buvik, M.P.: Monitor 2019—En deskriptiv kartlegging av digital tilstand i norske skoler og barnehager. SINTEF Digital, Trondheim (2019)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Hwang, G.: Definition, framework and research issues of smart learning environments—a context-aware ubiquitous learning perspective. Smart Learn. Environ. 1, 4 (2014).  https://doi.org/10.1186/s40561-014-0004-5CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Jensen, L., Konradsen, F.: A review of the use of virtual reality head-mounted displays in education and training. Educ. Inf. Technol. 23, 1515–1529 (2018).  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-017-9676-0CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Kim, S., Song, S.M., Yoon, Y.I.: Smart learning services based on smart cloud computing. Sensors 11(8), 7835–7850 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Koehler, M.J., Mishra, P., Kereluik, K., Shin, T.S., Graham, C.R.: The Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge Framework, In: J.M. Spector, et al. (eds.) Handbook of Research on Educational Communications and Technology (2014).  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-3185-5_9
  9. 9.
    Loewenberg Ball, D., Thames, M.H., Phelps, G.: Content knowledge for teaching: what makes it special? J. Teach. Edu. 59(5), 389–407 (2008).  https://doi.org/10.1177/0022487108324554CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Makransky, G., Lilleholt, L.: A structural equation modeling investigation of the emotional value of immersive virtual reality in education. Edu. Tech. Res. Dev. 66, 1141–1164 (2018).  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-018-9581-2CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Southgate, E., Smith, S.P., Cividino, C., Saxby, S., Kilham, J., Eather, G., Scevak, J., Summerville, D., Buchanan, R., Bergin, C.: Embedding immersive virtual reality in classrooms: ethical, organisational and educational lessons in bridging research and practice, Int. J. Child-Comput. Interact. 19, 19–29 (2019). ISSN 2212-8689.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijcci.2018.10.002
  12. 12.
    Tondeur, J., van Braak, J., Ertmer, P.A., Ottenbreit-Leftwich, A.: Understanding the relationship between teachers’ pedagogical beliefs and technology use in education: a systematic review of qualitative evidence. In: Educational Technology Research and Development. Springer, September 2016.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-016-9481-2
  13. 13.
    Wissenberg, M., Lippert, F.K., Folke, F., et al.: Association of national initiatives to improve cardiac arrest management with rates of bystander intervention and patient survival after out-of-hospital cardiac arrest. JAMA 310, 1377–1384 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Zhu, Z., Yu, M., Riezebos, P.: A research framework of smart education. Smart Learn. Environ. 3, 4 (2016).  https://doi.org/10.1186/s40561-016-0026-2CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  • Tone Lise Dahl
    • 1
    Email author
  • Siw Olsen Fjørtoft
    • 1
  • Andreas D. Landmark
    • 1
  1. 1.SINTEF DigitalTrondheimNorway

Personalised recommendations