Advertisement

Materials Use: A Socio-Cultural Perspective

Chapter
  • 12 Downloads

Abstract

In this chapter, four key terms and concepts in materials use and curriculum studies are first defined. I then introduce the unique context of Chinese ELT by tracing the evolving process of the College English (CE) course and mandatory textbooks in the past five decades. An extensive review of the literature on materials use in both ELT and mainstream education is provided to position the current study in terms of the research settings and theoretical perspectives. At the end of the chapter, I draw on Rabardel and Bourmaud’s (2003) instrument-mediated activity model as the overarching theoretical lens to unpack the complex relations among teachers, students, curriculum materials and the context in materials use.

References

  1. Abdel Latif, M. M. (2017). Teaching grammar using inductive and communicative materials: Exploring Egyptian EFL teachers’ practice and beliefs. In H. Masuhara, F. Mishan, & B. Tomlinson (Eds.), Practice and theory for materials development in L2 learning (pp. 275–289). Newcastle upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars.Google Scholar
  2. Ball, D. L., & Cohen, D. K. (1996). Reform by the book: What is or might be the role of curriculum materials in teacher learning and instructional reform? Educational Researcher, 25(9), 6–14.Google Scholar
  3. Bosompem, E. G. (2014). Materials adaptation in Ghana: Teachers’ attitudes and practices. In K. Garton & S. Graves (Eds.), International perspectives on materials in ELT (pp. 104–120). England: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  4. Brown, M. (2009). The teacher-tool relationship: Theorizing the design and use of curriculum materials. In J. Remillard, B. A. Herbel-Eisenmann, & G. M. Lloyd (Eds.), Mathematics teachers at work: Connecting curriculum materials and classroom instruction (pp. 17–36). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  5. Cai, J. G. (2011). A new breakthrough in editing principles of College English teaching materials. Technology Enhanced Foreign Language Education, 141, 3–9.Google Scholar
  6. Cai, J. G. (2012). Repositioning the teaching objectives of College English course at the backdrop of the globalization. Foreign Languages and Their Teaching, 3, 5–8.Google Scholar
  7. Canagarajah, S. (2018). Materializing ‘Competence’: Perspectives from international STEM scholars. The Modern Language Journal, 102(2), 268–291.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Chen, J. (2002). Reforming textbooks, reshaping school knowledge: Taiwan’s textbook deregulation in the 1990s. Pedagogy, Culture and Society, 10(1), 39–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Chen, J. L. (2007). The current situation and reform of college English textbooks. Foreign Language Teaching and Research, 39(5), 374–378.Google Scholar
  10. Cheng, X. T. (2011). The ‘English Curriculum Standards’ in China: Rationales and issues. In A. W. Feng (Ed.), English Language across Greater China (pp. 133–150). Bristol: Multilingual Matters.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Cole, M. (1996). Cultural psychology: A once and future discipline: Belknap Press.Google Scholar
  12. Collopy, R. (2003). Curriculum materials as a professional development tool: How a mathematics textbook affected two teachers’ learning. The Elementary School Journal, 103(3), 287–311.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Davis, E. A., & Krajcik, J. S. (2005). Designing educative curriculum materials to promote teacher learning. Educational Researcher, 34(3), 3–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Dong, Y. (2003). Reading and writing as the focuses of college English teaching in China. Foreign Language World, 1, 2–6.Google Scholar
  15. Edge, J., & Garton, S. (2009). From knowledge to experience in ELT. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  16. Engeström, Y. (1999). Activity theory and individual and social transformation. Perspectives on Activity Theory, 19–38.Google Scholar
  17. Fenwick, T., Edwards, R., & Sawchuk, P. (2011). Emerging approaches to educational research: Tracing the sociomaterial. Oxford: Routledge.Google Scholar
  18. Grammatosi, F., & Harwood, N. (2014). An experienced teacher’s use of the textbook on an academic English course: A case study. In N. Harwood (Ed.), English language teaching textbooks: Content, Consumption, Production (pp. 178–204). Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Graves, K., & Garton, S. (2017). An analysis of three curriculum approaches to teaching English in public-sector schools. Language Teaching, 50(4), 441–482.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Graves, K. (2019). Recent books on language materials development and analysis. ELT Journal, 73(3), 337–354.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Grossman, P., & Thompson, C. (2008). Learning from curriculum materials: Scaffolds for new teachers? Teaching and Teacher Education, 24(8), 2014–2026.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Guerrettaz, A. M., Grandon, M., Lee, S., Mathieu, C., Berwick, A., Murray, A., et al. (2018). Materials use and development: Synergetic processes and research prospects. Filio, 18, 37–44.Google Scholar
  23. Guerrettaz, A. M., & Johnston, B. (2013). Materials in the classroom ecology. The Modern Language Journal, 97(3), 779–796.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Gueudet, G., Pepin, B., & Trouche, L. (Eds.). (2012). From text to ‘lived’ resources: Mathematics curriculum materials and teacher development. Netherlands: Springer.Google Scholar
  25. Harwood, N. (Ed.). (2010). English language teaching materials: Theory and practice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  26. Humphries, S. (2014). Factors influencing Japanese teachers’ adoption of communication-oriented textbooks. In K. Garton & S. Graves (Eds.), International Perspectives on Materials in ELT (pp. 253–269). England: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  27. Hutchinson, E. G. (1996). What do teachers and learners actually do with textbooks? Teacher and learner use of a fisheries-based ELT textbook in the Philippines. Unpublished PhD Thesis, Lancaster University.Google Scholar
  28. Hutchinson, T., & Torres, E. (1994). The textbook as agent of change. ELT Journal, 48(4), 315–328.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Jakonen, T. (2015). Handling knowledge: Using classroom materials to construct and interpret information requests. Journal of Pragmatics, 89, 100–112.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Katz, A. (1996). Teaching style: A way to understand instruction in language classrooms. In K. M. Bailey & D. Nunan (Eds.), Voices from the language classroom: Qualitative research on language education (pp. 57–87). New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  31. Keller, C. M., & Keller, J. D. (1996). Cognition and tool use: The blacksmith at work. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  32. Lee, R., & Bathmaker, A. (2007). The use of English textbooks for teaching English to ‘vocational’ students in Singapore secondary schools: A survey of teachers’ beliefs. RELC Journal, 38(3), 350–374.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Li, Z., & Harfitt, G. J. (2017). An examination of language teachers’ enactment of curriculum materials in the context of a centralized curriculum. Pedagogy, Culture and Society, 25(3), 403–416.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Li, Z., & Harfitt, G. (2018). Understanding language teachers’ enactment of content through the use of curriculum materials. Asia-Pacific Journal of Teacher Education, 46(5), 461–477.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Liu, D., & Wu, Z. (2015). English language education in China: Past and present. Beijing, China: People’s Education Press.Google Scholar
  36. Loh, J., & Renandya, W. A. (2016). Exploring adaptations of materials and methods: A case from Singapore. The European Journal of Applied Linguistics and TEFL, 4(2), 93–111.Google Scholar
  37. Madsen, H. S., & Bowen, J. D. (1978). Adaptation in language teaching. Massachusetts: Newbury House Publishers.Google Scholar
  38. Markee, N. (2015). The handbook of classroom discourse and interaction. England: Wiley Blackwell.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. McDonald, G., Le, H., Higgins, J., & Podmore, V. (2005). Artifacts, tools, and classrooms. Mind, Culture, and Activity, 12(2), 113–127.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. McDonough, J., Shaw, C., & Masuhara, H. (2013). Materials and methods in ELT: A teacher’s guide (3rd ed.). Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar
  41. McGrath, I. (2016). Materials evaluation and design for language teaching (2nd ed.). Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar
  42. Ministry of Education. (2016). Daxue Yingyu Jiaoxue Zhinan (Curriculum requirements for college English). Beijing: Higher Education Press.Google Scholar
  43. Ministry of Education (MOE). (2017). Daxue Yingyu Jiaoxue Zhinan (Guidelines on College English Teaching). Beijing: Higher Education Press.Google Scholar
  44. Moll, L. C. (2000). Inspired by Vygotsky: Ethnographic experiments in education. In C. Lee & P. Smagorinsky (Eds.), Vygotsky perspectives on literacy research (pp. 256–268). New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  45. Moll, L. C. (2014). L. S. Vygotsky and education. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  46. National Bureau of Statistics of China (NBSC). (2017). China Statistical Yearbook 2017. Beijing: China Statistics Press.Google Scholar
  47. Rabardel, P., & Bourmaud, G. (2003). From computer to instrument system: A developmental perspective. Interacting with Computers, 15(5), 665–691.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Remillard, J. T. (1999). Curriculum materials in mathematics education reform: A framework for examining teachers’ curriculum development. Curriculum Inquiry, 29(3), 315–342.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Remillard, J. T. (2005). Examining key concepts in research on teachers’ use of mathematics curricula. Review of Educational Research, 75(2), 211–216.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Remillard, J. (2009). Considering what we know about the relationship between teachers and curriculum materials. In J. Remillard, B. A. Herbel-Eisenmann, & G. M. Lloyd (Eds.), Mathematics teachers at work: Connecting curriculum materials and classroom instruction (pp. 85–92). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  51. Remillard, J. T., & Bryans, M. B. (2004). Teachers’ orientations toward mathematics curriculum materials: Implications for teacher learning. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 35(5), 352–388.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Remillard, J. T., & Heck, D. J. (2014). Conceptualizing the curriculum enactment process in mathematics education. ZDM Mathematics Education, 46(5), 705–718.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Richards, J. C., & Mahoney, D. (1996). Teachers and textbooks: A survey of beliefs and practice. Perspectives, 8(1), 40–63.Google Scholar
  54. Sawyer, R. K. (2002). Emergence in psychology: Lessons from the history of non-reductionist science. Human Development, 45(1), 2–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Schneider, R. M., & Krajcik, J. (2002). Supporting science teacher learning: The role of educative curriculum materials. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 13(3), 221–245.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Shawer, S. F. (2010). Classroom-level curriculum development: EFL teachers as curriculum-developers, curriculum-makers and curriculum-transmitters. Teaching and Teacher Education, 26(2), 173–184.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Shawer, S. F. (2017). Teacher-driven curriculum development at the classroom level: Implications for curriculum, pedagogy, and teacher training. Teaching and Teacher Education, 63, 296–313.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Sherin, M. G., & Drake, C. (2009). Curriculum strategy framework: Investigating patterns in teachers’ use of a reform-based elementary mathematics curriculum. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 41(4), 467–500.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Smagorinsky, P., Lakly, A., & Johnson, T. S. (2002). Acquiescence, accommodation, and resistance in learning to teach within a prescribed curriculum. English Education, 34, 187–213.Google Scholar
  60. Sørensen, E. (2009). The materiality of learning: Technology and knowledge in educational practice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  61. Tasseron, M. (2017). How teachers use the global ELT coursebook. In H. Masuhara, F. Mishan, & B. Tomlinson (Eds.), Practice and theory of materials development in L2 learning (pp. 290–311). Newcastle upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars.Google Scholar
  62. Tomlinson, B. (2011). Materials development in language teaching (2nd ed.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  63. Tomlinson, B., & Masuhara, H. (2018). The complete guide to the theory and practice of materials development for language learning. Oxford: Wiley Blackwell.Google Scholar
  64. van den Akker, J. (2004). Curriculum perspectives: An introduction. In J. van den Akker, W. Kuiper, & U. Hameyer (Eds.), Curriculum landscapes and trends. Dordrecht: Springer.Google Scholar
  65. van Lier, L. (2004). The ecology and semiotics of language learning: A sociocultural perspective. Boston: Kluwer Academic.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  67. Wang, Y. (1999). ‘College English’ in China. English Today, 15(01), 45–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Wartofsky, M. (1979). Models: Representation and the scientific understanding. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: D. Reidel.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Wertsch, J. V. (1991). Voices of the mind: A sociocultural approach to mediated action. Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  70. Wertsch, J. V. (1998). Mind as action. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  71. William, M., & Burden, R. L. (1997). Psychology for language teachers: A social constructivist approach. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  72. Xu, J., & Fan, Y. (2017b). The evolution of the college English curriculum in China (1985-2015): Changes, trends and conflicts. Language Policy, 16, 267–289.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of Foreign LanguagesZhongnan University of Economics and LawWuhanChina

Personalised recommendations