Advertisement

Opportunistic Science Teaching and Learning ‘Outside’ the Classroom

  • Miguel IsonEmail author
  • Sharon Bramwell-Lalor
Chapter
  • 6 Downloads

Abstract

Science is often perceived to be conducted mainly in laboratories by scientists bearing stereotypical features. This is perpetuated in schools when science practicals are conducted in laboratory settings, using ritualized procedures requiring specialized and expensive equipment and for which the relevance of activities is not established. Using the lens of opportunistic teaching, this chapter highlights the experiences of pre-service science teachers and individuals who participated in practical activities, at a Research Days event held at a Jamaican tertiary institution. Visitors to the booths made and used coin batteries and ‘invisible’ ink. This multi-method study aimed at determining whether interacting with the activities impacted visitors’ chemistry knowledge, perceptions of science and understanding of science teaching. Survey findings from 101 student visitors revealed that after participating, over 60% of the responses to knowledge items were correct. Over 80% indicated that their impressions of science had changed and 90% reported a more favourable impression of science. These results suggest that engaging in authentic practicals ‘outside’ of the classroom had a positive impact on the participants’ knowledge and perception of science. The pre-service teachers learned that opportunistic teaching experiences engage learners and that effective science teaching may require improvisation. The findings imply that science teachers should provide more activities that relate to students’ experiences. This will likely contribute to their retention of information and heightened positive attitudes towards science. The authors recommend opportunistic learning as an instructional strategy that science teachers should use to promote student engagement and learning.

References

  1. Bultitude, K. (2014). Science festivals: do they succeed in reaching beyond the ‘already engaged’? Journal of Science Communication, 13(4) C01. https://jcom.sissa.it/archive/13/04/JCOM_1304_2014_C01.
  2. Campbell, P. B., Wahl, E., Slater, M., Iler, E., Moeller, B., Ba, H., et al. (1998). Paths to success: An evaluation of the gateway to higher education program. Journal of Women and Minorities in Science and Engineering, 4(2–3), 297–308.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Caribbean Council for Science and Technology (CCST), (2007). Science technology and innovation for sustainable development: Caribbean regional framework policy for action. Caribbean Council for Science and Technology.Google Scholar
  4. Falk, J. H., Moussouri, T., & Coulson, D. (1998). The effect of visitors’ agendas on museum learning. Curator: The Museum Journal, 41(2), 106–120.Google Scholar
  5. Fenichel, M., & Schweingruber, H. A. (2010). Surrounded by science: Learning science in informal environments. Board on Science Education, Center for Education, Division of Behavioral and Social Sciences and Education. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.Google Scholar
  6. Fetters, M. D., & Molina-Azorin, J. F. (2017). The journal of mixed methods esearch starts a new decade: Perspectives of past editors on the current state of the field and future directions. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 11(4), 423–432.  https://doi.org/10.1177/1558689817729476.
  7. Johnson, A. (2005). Summative evaluation of Kinetic City afterschool. Report for the American Association for the Advancement of Science. Richmond, VA: EduMetrics. Retrieved from http://www.kcmtv.com/juneevaluation.pdf.
  8. Jolly, E., Campbell, P., & Perlman, L. (2004). Engagement, capacity, and continuity: A trilogy for student success. Minneapolis, MN: GE Foundation.Google Scholar
  9. Korn, R. (2006). Search for life: Summative evaluation. New York: New York Hall of Science. Retrieved from http://www.informalscience.org/evaluations/report_151.pdf.
  10. Krapp, A., & Prenzel, M. (2011). Research on interest in science: Theories, methods and findings. International Journal of Science Education, 33(01), 27–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Maharaj-Sharma, R. (2013). What do students want in their science teachers and their science lessons? Caribbean Curriculum, 20, 101–113.Google Scholar
  12. McComas, W. F. (2006). Science teaching beyond the classroom: The role of informal learning environments. Science Teacher, 72(10), 26–30.Google Scholar
  13. McComas, W. F. (2011). Science fairs: A new look at an old tradition. Science Teacher, 78(8), 34–38.Google Scholar
  14. McMeeking, L. B. S., Weinberg, A. E., Boyd, K. J., & Balgopal, M. M. (2016). Student perceptions of interest, learning and engagement from an informal traveling science museum. School Science & Mathematics, 116(5), 253–264.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. National Research Council. (2009). Learning science in informal environments: people, places, and pursuits. Committee on Learning Science in Informal Environments. P. Bell, B. Lewenstein, A. W. Shouse, & M. A. Feder (Eds.). Board on Science Education, Center for Education, Division of Behavioral and Social Sciences and Education. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.Google Scholar
  16. Ogunkola, B. J. (2012). Improving science, technology and mathematics students’achievement: Imperatives for teacher preparation in the Caribbean colleges and universities. European Journal of Educational Research, 1(4), 367–378.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Osborne, J., Simon, S., & Collins, S. (2003). Attitudes towards science: A review of the literature and its implications. International Journal of Science Education, 25(9), 1049–1079.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Osborne, J. (2015). Practical work in science: misunderstood and badly used? School Science Review, 96, 16–24.Google Scholar
  19. Rennie, L. (2014). Learning science outside of school. In N. Lederman & S. Abell (Eds.), Handbook of research on science education (Vol. II, pp. 120–144). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  20. Rennie, L. J., & McClafferty, T. (1995). Using visits to interactive science and technology centers, museums, aquaria, and zoos to promote learning in science. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 6(4), 175–185.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Renninger, A., Hidi, S., & Krapp, A. (2014). The role of interest in learning and development. New York: Psychology Press Schmidt, K. M., & Kelter, P. (2017). Science fairs: A qualitative study of their impact on student science inquiry learning and attitudes toward STEM. Science Educator, 25(2), 126–132.Google Scholar
  22. SCORE. (2009). Assessment of practical work in science: Summary of a seminar organised by SCORE at the Royal Society, 16th November 2009. Retrieved from http://scoreeducation.org/events/assessment-of-practical-work.
  23. Shin, S. Y., Parker, L. C., Adedokun, O., Mennonno, A., Wackerly, A., & SanMiguel, S. (2015). Changes in elementary student perceptions of science, scientists and science careers after participating in a curricular module on health and veterinary science. School Science and Mathematics, 115(6), 271–280.  https://doi.org/10.1111/ssm.12129.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Simpkins, S. D., Davis-Kean, P. E., & Eccles, J. S. (2006). Math and science motivation: A longitudinal examination of the links between choices and beliefs. Developmental Psychology, 42(1), 70–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Stewart, S. (2015). Schooling and coloniality: Conditions underlying ‘Extra lessons’ in Jamaica. Postcolonial Directions in Education, 4(1), 25–52.Google Scholar
  26. Tran, N. (2011). The relationship between students’ connections to out-of-school experiences and factors associated with science learning. International Journal of Science Education, 33, 1625–1651.  https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2010.516030.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Woodley, E. (2009). Practical work in school science—why is it important. School Science Review, 91(335), 49–51.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.The University of the West IndiesKingstonJamaica

Personalised recommendations