Advertisement

Pedagogical and Content Expertise in Team-Based Learning: Re-aligning Two Teaching Perspectives in an Undergraduate Medical School

  • Lishan YangEmail author
  • Emmanuel Tan Chee Peng
  • Preman Rajalingam
Chapter
  • 20 Downloads

Abstract

The Lee Kong Chian School of Medicine (LKCMedicine), an undergraduate medical school in Singapore formed from a partnership between Nanyang Technological University (Singapore) and Imperial College London (United Kingdom), has been using Team-Based Learning (TBL) as one of its main teaching strategies successfully for large student classes of up to 150 since its inception in 2014. Each TBL session is led by an interdisciplinary faculty teaching team, which consists of at least one ‘Content Expert’, who would have led the development of curriculum for the particular session and who hence would have subject matter expertise, and a ‘TBL Facilitator’, who manages productive student discussions during TBL sessions and provides pedagogical expertise before and during the educational sessions. This chapter discusses and compares the perspectives of content and process experts from the lens of the well-validated Teaching Perspectives Inventory. Using interview data and quotes from both parties, this chapter will illustrate areas of convergence and tension. In doing so, we provide a framework to enhance the teaching of science and its professional application in a large, interactive and collaborative classroom.

References

  1. Biggs, J., & Tang, C. (2011). Teaching for quality learning at university: What the student does. UK: McGraw-Hill Education.Google Scholar
  2. Collins, J. B., & Pratt, D. D. (2011). The teaching perspectives inventory at 10 years and 100,000 respondents: Reliability and validity of a teacher self-report inventory. Adult Education Quarterly, 61(4), 358–375.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Friend, M., & Cook, L. (2004). Co-Teaching: Principles, practices, and pragmatics. In New Mexico Public Education Department Quarterly Special Education Meeting, Albuquerque, New Mexico, 29 April 2004 [Participant’s Guide]. New Mexico Public Education Department.Google Scholar
  4. Gaytan, J. (2010). Instructional strategies to accommodate a team-teaching approach. Business Communication Quarterly, 73(1), 82–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Gurman, E. B. (1989). The effect of prior test exposure on performance in two instructional settings. The Journal of Psychology, 123(3), 275–278.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Marshall, J. C., Horton, R., Igo, B. L., & Switzer, D. M. (2009). K-12 science and mathematics teachers’ beliefs about and use of inquiry in the classroom. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 7(3), 575–596.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Michaelsen, L. K., & Sweet, M. (2008). The essential elements of team-based learning. New Directions for Teaching and Learning, 2008(116), 7–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Parmelee, D., Michaelsen, L. K., Cook, S., & Hudes, P. D. (2012). Team-based learning: A practical guide: AMEE Guide No. 65. Medical Teacher, 34(5), e275–e287.Google Scholar
  9. Partridge, M. R. (2013). Redefining medicine, transforming healthcare: The Lee Kong Chian school of medicine. Annals of the Academy of Medicine, Singapore, 42(4), 165–167.Google Scholar
  10. Pratt, S. (2014). Achieving symbiosis: Working through challenges found in co-teaching to achieve effective co-teaching relationships. Teaching and Teacher Education, 41, 1–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Pratt, D. D., & Collins, J. B. (2001). Development and use of the teaching perspectives inventory (TPI). American Educational Research, 1–9.Google Scholar
  12. Pratt, D. D., Selinger, S. J., Hopkins, R. M., Arseneau, R., Smulders, D., Egan, J. P., et al. (2016). Five perspectives on teaching: Mapping a plurality of the good (2nd ed.). Malabar, FL: Krieger Publishing Company.Google Scholar
  13. Rajalingam, P., Rotgans, J. I., Zary, N., Ferenczi, M. A., Gagnon, P., & Low-Beer, N. (2018). Implementation of team-based learning on a large scale: Three factors to keep in mind. Medical Teacher, 40(6), 582–588.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Rotgans, J. I., Schmidt, H. G., Rajalingam, P., Hao, J. W. Y., Canning, C. A., Ferenczi, M. A., & Low-Beer, N. (2017). How cognitive engagement fluctuates during a team-based learning session and how it predicts academic achievement. Advances in Health Sciences Education, 1–13.Google Scholar
  15. Rotgans, J. I., Rajalingam, P., Ferenczi, M. A., & Low-Beer, N. (2018). A students’ model of team-based learning. Health Professions Education.Google Scholar
  16. Thompson, B. M., Schneider, V. F., Haidet, P., Levine, R. E., McMahon, K. K., Perkowski, L. C., et al. (2007). Team-based learning at ten medical schools: Two years later. Medical Education, 41(3), 250–257.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Walsh, J. M. (2012). Co-teaching as a school system strategy for continuous improvement. Preventing School Failure: Alternative Education for Children and Youth, 56(1), 29–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Yang, L., & Rajalingam, P. (2019). Are two teachers better than one? Team teaching in TBL. Medical Science Educator, 1–5.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  • Lishan Yang
    • 1
    Email author
  • Emmanuel Tan Chee Peng
    • 1
  • Preman Rajalingam
    • 1
  1. 1.Nanyang Technological UniversitySingaporeSingapore

Personalised recommendations