Assessing Conceptual Understanding in Primary Science Through Students’ Multimodal Representations in Science Notebooks
- 30 Downloads
This chapter reports on a study which explored how teachers could identify gaps in their students’ conceptual understanding, and facilitate students’ use of both appropriate content vocabulary and visual representations to communicate scientific concepts through the use of science notebooks. The study pilots a framework that was developed for assessing, through students’ artefacts, the extent to which students’ conceptual understanding, specific content vocabulary, and the ability to show relationships between concepts were made explicit. Implications are discussed, with attention given to refinements of the framework.
The authors wish to thank Noorhafidzah Shaffi, Amy Tan Li-Xian, Wong Choo Lat supported by Chew Mun Wai of Ang Mo Kio Primary School for their invaluable support and contribution to this study.
- Bybee, R. W., Taylor, J. A., Gardner, A., Scotter, P. V, Powell, J. C., Westbrook, A., & N. Landes, N. (2006). The BSCS 5E instructional model: Origins and effectiveness. A report prepared for the Office of Science Education, National Institutes of Health. Colorado Springs, CO: BSCS.Google Scholar
- Edwards, N. (2015). Multimodality in science education as productive pedagogy in a PGCE programme. Perspectives in Education, 33(3), 159–176.Google Scholar
- English Language Institute of Singapore (ELIS). (2011). Whole school approach to effective communication. Retrieved from http://www.elis.moe.edu.sg/professional-learning/subject-literacy.
- Hargrove, T. Y., & Nesbit, C. (2003). Science notebooks: Tools for increasing achievement across the curriculum. Columbus, OH: ERIC Clearinghouse for Science, Mathematics, and Environmental Education. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED482720).Google Scholar
- Halliday, M. A. K., & Martin, J. R. (1993). Writing science. Literacy and discursive power. London: University of Pittsburgh Press.Google Scholar
- Jewitt, C., & Kress, G. (Eds.). (2003). Multimodal literacy. New York, NY: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
- Kress, G. (2010). Multimodality. A social semiotic approach to contemporary communication. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
- Kress, G., & van Leeuwen, T. (2001). Multimodal discourse: The modes and media of contemporary communication. London, New York: Arnold.Google Scholar
- Lemke, J. (1998). Multiplying meaning: Visual and verbal semiotics in scientific text. In J. Martin & R. Veel (Eds.). Reading science: Critical and functional perspectives on discourses of science (pp. 87–113). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
- Lim, F. V., O’Halloran, K. L., Tan, S., & E, M. K. L. (2015). Teaching visual texts with multimodal analysis software. Educational Technology Research and Development, 63(6), 915–935.Google Scholar
- Macken-Horarik, M., Love, K., Sandiford, C., & Unsworth, L. (2017). Functional grammatics. London, New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
- McDermott, M. A., & Hand, B. (2013). Improving scientific literacy through multimodal communication: Strategies, benefits and challenges. School Science Review, 97(359), 15–20.Google Scholar
- Mills, K. A., & Unsworth, L. (2017). Multimodal literacy. In Online Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Education. Retrieved from http://oxfordindex.oup.com/view/10.1093/acrefore/9780190264093.013.232.
- Reed, M. (2012). Science notebooks: Improving students’ conceptual and scientific practices. Paper submitted in partial fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Science in Science Education. Montana: Montana State University.Google Scholar
- Ruiz-Primo, M. A., Li, M. & Shavelson, R. J. (2002). Looking into students’ science notebooks: What do teachers do with them? CSE Technical Report 562. Los Angeles, CA: Centre for Research on Evaluation, Standards and Student Testing, University of California.Google Scholar
- Tang, K. S., Ho, C., & Putra, G. B. S. (2016). Developing multimodal communication competencies: A case of disciplinary literacy focus in Singapore. In B. Hand, M. McDermott, & V. Prain (Eds.), Using multimodal representations to support learning in the Science classroom (pp. 135–158). Cham, Switzerland: Springer International Publishing.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Tang, K. S. (2015). Reconceptualising science education practices from new literacies research. Science Education International., 26(3), 307–324.Google Scholar
- Unsworth, L. (2014). Investigating point of view in picture books and animated movie adaptations. In K. Mallam (Ed.), Picture books and beyond: Ways of reading and discussing multimodal texts (pp. 92–107). Sydney: Primary English Teaching Association of Australia.Google Scholar
- van Leeuwen, T. (2017). Multimodal literacy. Viden om Læsning [Knowledge About Reading], 21, 14–21.Google Scholar