Advertisement

Development of a Model for the Number of Bends During Stirrup Making Process

  • S. N. WaghmareEmail author
  • Sagar D. Shelare
  • C. K. Tembhurkar
  • S. B. Jawalekar
Conference paper
  • 5 Downloads
Part of the Lecture Notes in Mechanical Engineering book series (LNME)

Abstract

Stirrup making is a process to angling reinforcement bars at expected edges into civil engineering work. Hand-operated bar bending requires vigorous physical exercise, which is generally done in a bad ergonomic atmosphere at construction site. This could begin to prolonged musculoskeletal complications such as profound back disorder among bar benders. Current research explains a numerical model for number of bends, torque and required time to process of a stirrup making method using human fortified flywheel motor based on testing data collected, applying a method of design for experimentation. Out of the above three models, the numerical model and its analysis for a number of bend for the stirrup producing process is described here. Findings obtained by the numerical model for a number of bends positively describes the degree of interaction of multiple independent parameters for stirrup producing operation.

Keywords

Stirrup Bar bending Human power Sensitivity analysis 

References

  1. 1.
    Indian Construction Industry Overview. http://www.indianconstructionindustry.com/overview.html, [online].
  2. 2.
  3. 3.
    Tam, C. M., Zeng, S. X., & Deng, Z. M. (2004). Identifying elements of poor construction safety management in China. 42, 569–586.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssci.2003.09.001.
  4. 4.
    Choudhry, R. M., Fang, D., & Lingard, H. (2009). Measuring safety climate of a construction company. 890–899.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Chi, C., Yang, C., & Chen, Z. (2009). In-depth accident analysis of electrical fatalities in the construction industry. International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics, 39, 635–644.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ergon.2007.12.003.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Accident The (1981). Accident proneness: a conceptual.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Cheng, E. W. L., Ryan, N., & Kelly, S. (2012). Exploring the perceived influence of safety management practices on project performance in the construction industry. 50, 363–365.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Group, R. B. (2006). Ergonomic assessment of bar cutting process in construction Venkatesh Balasubramanian and G. Swami Prasad.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    De, Corte W., & Boel, V. (2013). Effectiveness of spirally shaped stirrups in reinforced concrete beams. Engineering Structures, 52, 667–675.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2013.03.032.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Berke, P. Z., & Massart, T. J. (2018). Modelling of stirrup confinement effects in RC layered beam finite elements using a 3D yield criterion and transversal equilibrium constraints. International Journal of Concrete Structures and Materials.  https://doi.org/10.1186/s40069-018-0278-z.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Balasubramanian, V., & Prasad, G. S. (2007). Manual bar bending—An occupational hazard for construction workers in developing nations. 791–797.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Khope, P., Modak, J., & Singh, M. (2014). Development of human powered energy unit for fodder cutting. 4487, 158–160.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Modak, J. P., & Bapat, A. R. (1994). Formulation of a generalized experimental model for a manually driven flywheel motor and its optimization. Applied Ergonomics, 25, 119–122.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Schenck, H., Jr. Theory of engineering experimentation. New York, NY: McGraw Hill.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    ​Waghmare, S. N., Sakhale, C. N., Tembhurkar, C. K., & Shelare, S. D. (2020). Assessment of average resistive torque for human-powered stirrup making process. In: B. Iyer, P. Deshpande, S. Sharma & U. Shiurkar (Eds.), Computing in Engineering and Technology. Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing (Vol. 1025). Singapore: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-32-9515-5_79
  16. 16.
    Undirwade, S. K., Singh, M. P., & Sakhale, C. N. (2015). Experimental investigation of processing time, number of slivers and resistive torque required for human powered bamboo sliver cutting operation. Journal of Bamboo and Rattan, 14, 33–51.Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Nwakuba, N. R., Ejesu, P. K., & Okafor, V. C. (2017). A mathematical model for predicting the drying rate of cocoa bean (Theobroma cacao L.) in a hot air dryer. 19, 195–202.Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Sakhale, C. N., Waghmare, S. N., K. S., Sonde, V. M., Singh, M. P. (2014). Formulation and comparison of experimental based mathematical model with artificial neural network simulation and RSM (response surface methodology) model for optimal performance of sliver cutting operation of bamboo. Procedia Materials Science, 6, 877–891.Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Undirwade, S. K., Singh, M. P., & Sakhale, C. N. (2015). Experimental investigation of processing time, number of slivers and resistive torque required for human powered bamboo sliver cutting operation. 14, 33–51.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2021

Authors and Affiliations

  • S. N. Waghmare
    • 1
    Email author
  • Sagar D. Shelare
    • 1
  • C. K. Tembhurkar
    • 1
  • S. B. Jawalekar
    • 1
  1. 1.Priyadarshini College of EngineeringNagpurIndia

Personalised recommendations