Advertisement

Design Optimization of Go-Kart Chassis Frame Using Modal Analysis

  • A. A. Dere
  • Manpreet SinghEmail author
  • A. Thakan
  • Rajeev Kumar
  • Harpreet Singh
Conference paper
  • 5 Downloads
Part of the Lecture Notes in Mechanical Engineering book series (LNME)

Abstract

The chassis of automobile houses crucial mechanical component such as engine, suspension, steering and transmission system. Therefore, the chassis structure must be strong enough to absorb the static and dynamic loads generated by these mechanical components. In this work, the structural strength of go-kart chassis has been improved against static and dynamic loads through geometrical modifications. The geometrical modifications in the chassis structures were decided individually on each structural element where maximum deformation was analyzed in the modal analysis. This structural element was reanalyzed after making multiple variations in its geometry in attempt to minimize the deformation. When the minimum deformation was achieved in the structural element, then structure was finalized for stage 1. Similarly, other structural elements were also modified in the same continuous iterative process by keeping in consideration the weight constraints. After the termination of each modification torsion test, impact analysis was also carried out to examine torsional rigidity and crashworthiness. In five successive iterations, the optimum results for the chassis structure were obtained with little scope of further improvement. In the final structure, the lowest modal frequency was found to be shifted from 11.691 to 57.318 Hz to that of the initial structure. A significant reduction of 42% in maximum deformation along with a reduction in mode shapes was also witnessed in the final structure. The final structure was also found to be better in the results obtained from torsional analysis and impact testing.

Keywords

Modal analysis Chassis structure Resonance Dynamic analysis Vibration analysis 

References

  1. 1.
    Abdullah, N. A. Z., Shahrir, S., Mustafizur, R., & Izzuddin, Z. (2017). Dynamics properties of a go-kart chassis structure and its prediction improvement using model updating approach. International Journal of Automotive and Mechanical Engineering, 14(1), 3887–3897.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Kirpal, S. (2000). Automotive engineering (Vol. 1). Standard Publication.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Tuononen, A. J., & Lajunen, A. (2016). Modal analysis of different drivetrain configurations in electric vehicles. Journal of Vibration and Control, 1(11), 1–11.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Pang, H., Li, H. Y., Fang, Z. D., & Shan, N. (2010). Ride comfort optimization and test research on an 8*4 heavy truck. Noise and Vibration Worldwide, 41(10), 65–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Kim, K., & Kim, C. (2005). A study on the body attachment stiffness for the road noise. Journal of Mechanical Science and Technology, 19(6), 1304–1312.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Feng, Y., & Jun, X. (2018). Modal analysis and improvement of the frame for all-terrain vehicle. Noise and Vibration Worldwide, 1(5), 1–5.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Shrinidhi, R., & Ajay, B. (2019). Dynamic analysis and design optimization of automobile chassis frame using FEM. Lecture Notes in Mechanical Engineering (pp. 671–680). Singapore: Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Khannukar, K., Kallannavar, V., & Manjunath, B. (2015). Dynamic analysis of automotive chassis using FEA. International Research Journal of Engineering and Technology, 2(9), 2167–2170.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Jena, D. P., Singh, M., & Kumar, R. (2012). Radial ball bearing inner race defect width measurement using analytical wavelet transform of acoustic and vibration signal. Measurement Science Review, 12(4), 141–148.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Singh, M., Kumar, R., & Jena, D. P. (2009). Detection of missing ball in bearing using decomposition of acoustic signal. Asian Journal of Chemistry, 21(10), 143–147.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Singh, M., Shoor, S., & Singh, H. (2018). Shannon entropy a better indice for local defect detection and to study the effect of variable loading conditions for taper roller bearing. International Journal of Mechanical Engineering and Technology (IJMET), 9(7), 198–208.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Rajappan, R., & Vivekanandhan, M. (2013). Static and modal analysis of chassis by using FEA. The International Journal of Engineering and Science, 2(2), 63–73.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Jimin, H., & Zhi-Fang, F. (2001). Modal analysis (Vol. 1). Oxford: Butterworth-Heinemann Publication.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Antonio, F. A. R., André, L. R. P., André, C., Luiz, C. G., Moisés, D. S. P., & Anderson, B. O. (2015). Static and dynamic analysis of a chassis of a prototype car. SAE Technical Paper Series, International Congress and Display, Sao Paulo, Brazil, 2015-36-0353.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Frederico, M. A. S., Ramon, M. V., Marco, T. C. F., & Flavio, P. D. (2004). Modal analysis of a tubular structure vehicle chassis. SAE Technical Paper Series, XIII Congresso e Exposico Internacionals da Tecnologia da Mobilidade Sao Paulo, Brazil, 2004-01-3423.Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Sane, S. S., Ghanshyam, J., & Anandaraj, H. Stress analysis of light commercial vehicle using ANSYS (pp. 1–5). Piaggio Vehicles Pvt Ltd, HTC 08.Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Archit, T., & Dheer, S. (2016). Static analysis modal analysis and design modification in chassis frame to optimize weight by using composite material. International Journal of Mechanical Engineering, 5(1), 2319–2359.Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Mohammad, R. F., & Rouhollah, H. (2010). Dynamic analysis of a modified truck chassis. International Journal Advanced Design and Manufacturing Technology, 3(1), 31–37.Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Teo, H. F., & Roslan, A. R. (2007). Statics and dynamics structural analysis of a 4.5 ton truck chassis. Journal Mekanikal, 24, 56–67.Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Prasad, S., & Laxman, A. (2018). Design modification of ladder chassis frame based on dynamic analysis. International Research Journal of Engineering and Technology, 2(9), 3877–3882.Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Mousa, H., Farshid, A., Ruhollah, H., & Reza, M. (2011). A study on the vibrational effects of adding an auxiliary chassis to a 6-ton truck. Journal of American Science, 7(6), 1219–1229.Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Rashid, A. Z. Y., Haris, R. R. M. S., & Alias, A. (2014). Improving the dynamic characteristics of body-in-white structure using structural optimization. Scientific World Journal Hindawi Publishing Corporation, 1, 1–11.Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    International Go-Kart Championship Rule Book 2018.Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Oliveira, F. C. G. (2007). Contribuição ao desenvolvimento de uma estrutura veicular tipo SpaceFrame usando o método dos elementos finitos e métodos heurísticos de otimização numérica. Dissertação para obtenção do título de Mestre em engenharia mecânica. Universidade Federal de Uberlândia.Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Daryl, L. L. (2010). A first course in the finite element method (5th ed.). Boston: Cengage Learning.Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Gandhi, U. N., & Hu, S. J. (1995). Data based approach in modelling automobile crash. International Journal Impact Engineering, 16(1), 95–118.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Lam, K. P., Behdinan, K., & Cleghorn, W. L. (2003). A material and gauge thickness sensitivity analysis on the NVH and crashworthiness of automotive instrument panel support. Thin-Walled Structures, 41, 1005–1018.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Rao, S. S. (2010). Mechanical vibrations (5th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Lardies, J., & Larbi, N. (2001). Modal analysis of random vibrating systems from multi output data. Journal of Vibration and Control, 7, 339–363.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Norm FIAT. (2002). Corso Per Progettisti di Scocca, Norma Fiat; Torino.Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Leandro, P. S., & Felipe, N. (2001). Application of modal analysis and operating deflection shapes on the study of trucks and buses dynamic behavior. SAE Technical Paper Series, International Truck and Bus Meeting and Exhibition, Chicago, Illinois, 2001-01-2780.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2021

Authors and Affiliations

  • A. A. Dere
    • 1
  • Manpreet Singh
    • 2
    Email author
  • A. Thakan
    • 2
  • Rajeev Kumar
    • 3
    • 4
  • Harpreet Singh
    • 5
  1. 1.Automobile EngineeringLovely Professional UniversityJalandharIndia
  2. 2.Department of Mechanical EngineeringLovely Professional UniversityJalandharIndia
  3. 3.Department of Mechanical EngineeringLovely Professional UniversityPhagwaraIndia
  4. 4.Inder Kumar Gujral Punjab Technical UniversityKapurthalaIndia
  5. 5.Department of Planning and QualityNettbuss ASOsloNorway

Personalised recommendations