Advertisement

How Love Is Possible: A Christian Approach to the Problem of Social Justice in China

  • Zhibin XieEmail author
Chapter
  • 19 Downloads

Abstract

The issue of love and justice has become increasingly an outstanding moral and social problem in contemporary China. The marginalized group of people in the areas of education, job market, and social welfare in China raises various problems of conflict and inequality, which demand justice in those areas. Regarding just settlement for this group, some relevant studies in disciplines such as political science, law and sociology have attended more to institutional, distributive arrangements and economic factors. This chapter aims to understand the moral identity of this marginalized group from Christian theological perspective of love and explore its implications to the problem of social justice in China. Drawing from and attempting to integrate both Reinhold Niebuhr and Nicholas Wolterstorff’s distinctive positions on love and justice, this chapter points out the possibilities and limitations of applying Christian love in its relationship to social justice in Chinese society. It proposes that if justice is embedded into the ideal of love, justice will not become a pure and mechanic political concept, on the one hand, and the ideas of “justice in love” and “love complementing justice” will enrich and enhance the discourse on social justice in the Chinese context on the other.

References

  1. 1.
    Benedict XVI. (2019). Encyclical Letter Caritas in Veritate of the Supreme Pontiff. Retrieved October 30, 2019, from http://w2.vatican.va/content/benedict-xvi/en/encyclicals/documents/hf_ben-xvi_enc_20090629_caritas-in-veritate.html.
  2. 2.
    Bennett, J. C. (1956). Reinhold Niebuhr’s social ethics. In W. K. Charles & Bretall R. W. (Eds.), Reinhold Niebuhr: His religious, social, and political thought (p. 59).Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Ding, G. X. (1997). Learning from theology of liberation, theology of Pierre Teilhard de Chardi and process theology. In G. X. Ding (Ed.), Collected works of Guangxun Ding (p. 214). Nanjing: Translation Press.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Dorrien, G. (2011). Introduction to Reinhold Niebuhr. In The children of light and the children of darkness (p. xxii). Chicago and London: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Frederking, L. C. (2014). Reconstructing social justice (p. 97). New York, NY: Routledge.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Forrester, D. B. (2010). Forrester on Christian ethics and practical theology: Collected writings on Christianity, India, and the social order (p. 252). Surrey, England: Ashgate.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Goodin, R. E. (1985). Protecting the vulnerable: A reanalysis of our social responsibility (pp. 26–27). Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Liang, Z. (2010). Introduction. In Z. Liang (Ed.) Social justice in transformative period: Problem and prospect [Zhuanxingqi de Shehui Gongzheng: Wenti yu Qianjing 转型期的社会公正:问题与前景] (p. 5). Beijing: Three Joint Publishing House.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Lovin, R. (1995). Reinhold Niebuhr and Christian realism (p. 199). Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Niebuhr, R. (1935). An interpretation of Christian ethics (p. 140). New York, London: Harper Brothers Publishers.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Niebuhr, R. (1947). Moral man and immoral society: A study in ethics and politics (p. 81). New York: Charles Scribner’s Sons.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Niebuhr, R. (1992). Love and justice: Selections from the shorter writings (p. 25). Louisville, KY: Westminster/John Knox Press.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Niebuhr, R. (1998). Moral man and immoral society: A study in ethics and politics (p. 57). Eugene: Wipf and Stock Publishers.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Outka, G. (1972). Agape: An ethical analysis (pp. 7–54). New Haven and London: Yale University Press (1972).Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Pew Research Centre. (2017). Religious Diversity Index Scores by Country. Retrieved June 7, 2017, http://www.pewforum.org/2014/04/04/religious-diversity-index-scores-by-country/.
  16. 16.
    Pontifical Council for Justice and Peace. (2005). Compendium of the social doctrine of the church (pp. 294–295). London: Burns & Oates.Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Ramsey, P. (1956). Love and law. In C. W. Kegley & R. W. Bretall, (Eds.), Reinhold Niebuhr: His religious, social, and political thought, (p. 95). New York: The Macmillan CompanyGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Rasmussen, L. (Ed.). (1989). Reinhold Niebuhr: Theologian of public life (p. 127) London: Collins.Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Robertson, D.B. (1992). “Introduction” to Reinhold Niebuhr. Love and justice: Selections from the shorter writings (p. 12). Louisville, KY: Westminster/John Knox Press.Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    United Nations. (2019). If you want peace & development, work for social justice. Retrieved May 30, 2019, from http://www.un.org/zh/events/socialjusticeday/index.shtml.
  21. 21.
    Wolterstorff, N. (2011). Justice in love (p. 66). Grand Rapids, MI: Eerdamans.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of HumanitiesTongji UniversityShanghaiP. R. China

Personalised recommendations