Flexible Governance: Petition, Disputes and Citizen’s Rights Protection in Contemporary China

  • Jieren HuEmail author
  • Tong Wu
  • Jingyang Fei


Blamed as a major threat to an effective judiciary, Xinfang not only often fails to resolve social disputes between the petitioners and the Party-state in the authoritarian regime but also exacerbates the conflict. Using two cases of Shanghai, this chapter shows that the innovative mechanism of involving petition social workers (PSWs) in settling disputes is a kind of “flexible governance” (FG) stressing affective care and the use of multi-pronged means of dispute resolution to relieve petition pressure and maintain social stability by the authoritarian state. Facing the surge and intensification of social conflict in recent years, “flexible governance” reflects the corporatist relations between social organizations and the local state with the state’s intensive political control over the society.


  1. 1.
    Cai, Y. (2008). Power structure and regime resilience: Contentious politics in China. British Journal of Political Science, 38(3), 411–432.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Chen, F., & Kang, Y. (2016). Disorganized popular contention and local Institutional Building in China: A case study in guangdong. Journal of Contemporary China, 25(100), 596–612.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Dahl, R. A. (1961). Who governs? Democracy and power in an American city. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Diamant, N. J., & O’Brien, K. (2015). Veteran’s political activism in China. Modern China, 41(3), 278–312.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Diamond, L. (1994). Rethinking civil society: Toward democratic consolidation. Journal of Democracy, 5(3), 4–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Goldstone, J. A., & Tilly, C. (2001). Threat (and Opportunity): Popular action and state response in the dynamics of contentious action. In R. R. Aminzade, J. A. Goldstone, D. McAdam, E. J. Perry, W. H. Sewell Jr., S. Tarrow & C. Tilley (Eds.), Silence and voice in the study of contentious politics (179–194). New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Government of the Republic of China. (2011). Ministry of Civil Affairs. Retrieved November 8, 2011, from and April 26, 2012. Retrieved March 9, 2018, from
  8. 8.
    Hill, T., & Westbrook, R. (1997). SWOT analysis: It’s time for a product recall. Long Range Planning, 30(1), 46–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Hsu, J., & Hasmath, R. (2014). The local corporatist state and NGO relations in China. Journal of Contemporary China, 23(87), 516–534.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Hu, J. (2011). Grand mediation: Mechanism and application in China. Asian Survey, 51(6), 1065–1089.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Hu, J. (2016). Shi Hexie Shequ Yunzhuan Qilai: Dangdai Zhongguo Chengshi Shequ Jiufen Huajie Yanjiu (Making Harmonious Community Work: A Study on Disputes Resolution in Urban Communities in Contemporary China). Shanghai: Shanghai People’s Press.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Hu, J., & Zheng, Y. (2016). Breaking the dilemma between litigation and non-litigation: Diversified mechanism of dispute resolution’ in China. China Perspectives, 2, 45–53.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    K District Statistical Yearbook. (2009–2014).Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Landry, P. (2008). Decentralized authoritarianism in China: The communist party’s control of local elites in the Post-Mao Era. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Lee, X., & Zhifen, L. (2016). Shegong Jieru Xinfang Gongzuo de Zhuanbian. (The Change of Involving Social Workers’ in Petition Cases). Zhongguo Shehui Gongzuo (China Social Work), 24, 32–33.Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Manning, S. S. (1997). The social worker as moral citizen: Ethics in action. Social Work, 42(3), 223–230.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Migdal, J. S. (1988). Strong societies and weak states—state-society relations and state capabilities in the third world. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Minzner, C. F. (2006). Xinfang: An alternative to formal chinese legal institutions. Stanford Journal of International Law, 42, 103–179.Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Perry, E. J. (2008). Reclaiming the Chinese revolution. The Journal of Asian Studies, 67(4), 1147–1164.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Pratchett, L. (2004). Local autonomy, local democracy and the “new localism”. Political Studies, 52(2), 358–375.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Reamer, F. (1998). Ethical standards in social work: A critical review of the NASW code of ethics. Washington, DC: NASW Press.Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Reuschemeyer, D., & Evans P. B. (1985). The state and economic transformation: Toward an analysis of the conditions underlying effective intervention. (translated by Grigory Yudin). Diagnostic & Interventional Imaging, 93(4), 232–245.Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Saich, T. (2000). Negotiating the state: The development of social organizations in China. The China Quarterly, 161, 124–141.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Schmitter, P. C. (1974). Still the century of corporatism? In F. B. Pike & T. Stritch (Eds.), The new Corporatism. London: University of Notre Dame Press.Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Su, L. (2010). Nengdong Sifa. (Active Judiciary). Falv Shiyong (Journal of Law Application), 1, 5–16.Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Teets, J. C. (2014). Civil society under authoritarianism: The China model. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Unger, J., & Chan, A. (1995). China, corporatism, and the East Asia model. The Australian Journal of Chinese Affairs, 33, 29–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Veterans. (2011). Shanghai Giye Junzhuan Ganbu gei Shanghai Shiwei Shizhengfu de Yifeng Gongkaixin, (An Open Letter from Military-transferred Cadres in Enterprises to Shanghai Municipal Government), August 4, 2011. Retrieved February 2, 2017, from
  29. 29.
    You, Y., & Qianmin, C. (2013). Minzhengju Yinjin Zhuanye Shegong Fuwu Futui Junren. (Civil Affairs Bureau Introduces Professional Social Workers to Serve Retired Soldiers), November 21, 2013. Retrieved 8 June, 2017, from

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Law SchoolTongji UniversityShanghaiP. R. China
  2. 2.School of Social DevelopmentEast China UniversityShanghaiP. R. China
  3. 3.School of International Relations and Public AffairsFudan UniversityShanghaiP. R. China

Personalised recommendations