Advertisement

Embodying Data pp 115-138 | Cite as

Methodology

Chapter
  • 4 Downloads

Abstract

This book focuses on investigating a possible new aesthetic approach to data visualization through gesture-based gaming technology, rather than the conventional models of producing functional, visual understandings of data. In this book, data visualization is defined as the visual representation of numeric data, which is the foundation for a data-based creative practice.

References

  1. Barrett, E. (2007). The exegesis as meme. In E. Barrett & B. Bolt (Eds.), Practice as research: Approaches to creative arts enquiry (pp. 159–163). London: I.B. Tauris & Co.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bolt, B. (2007). The magic is in handling. In E. Barrett & B. Bolt (Eds.), Practice as research: Approaches to creative arts enquiry (pp. 27–34). London: I.B. Tauris & Co.Google Scholar
  3. Borenstein, G. (2012). Making things see: 3D vision with Kinect, processing, Arduino, and MakerBot. Sebastopol, CA: O’Reilly Media.Google Scholar
  4. Boulos, M. N. K., Blanchard, B. J., Walker, C., Montero, J., Tripathy, A., & Gutierrez-Osuna, R. (2011). Web GIS in practice X: a Microsoft Kinect natural user interface for Google Earth navigation. International journal of health geographics, 10(1), 45.Google Scholar
  5. Brown, A. R., & Sorensen, A. (2008). Integrating creative practice and research in the digital media arts. In H. Smith & R. Dean (Eds.), Practice-led research, research-led practice in the creative arts (pp. 153–165). Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar
  6. Buro, M., Elio, R., Hoover, J., Nikolaidis, I., Salavatipour, M., Stewart, L., & Wong, K. (n.d.). About computing science research methodology. Retrieved from: http://webdocs.cs.ualberta.ca/~c603/readings/research-methods.pdf.
  7. Chen, C. (2005). Top 10 unsolved information visualization problems. Computer Graphics and Applications, IEEE, 25(4), 12–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Collins, H. (2010). Creative research: the theory and practice of research for the creative industries. Lausanne: AVA Publishing.Google Scholar
  9. Colson, R. (2007). The fundamentals of digital art. Lausanne: AVA Publishing SA.Google Scholar
  10. Costley, C., Elliott, G., & Gibbs, P. (2010). Developing a methodology. In C. Costley, G. Elliott, & P. Gibbs (Eds.), Doing work based research: Approaches to enquiry for insider-researchers. London: Sage.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Daichendt, G. J. (2012). Artist scholar: Reflections on writing and research. Bristol: Intellect.Google Scholar
  12. De Vaus, D. A. (2001). Research design in social research. London, UK: Sage.Google Scholar
  13. Frayling, C. (1993). Research in art and design. London: Royal College of Art.Google Scholar
  14. Ekman, P. (1957). A methodological discussion of nonverbal behavior. Journal of Psychology, 43, 141–149.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Foster, P. (2006). Observational research. In R. Sapsford & V. Jupp (Eds.), Data collection and analysis (pp. 57–92). London: Sage Publications in association with the Open University.Google Scholar
  16. Goldschmidt, G. (1991). The dialectics of sketching. Creativity Research Journal, 4(2), 123–143.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Gray, C. (1996). Inquiry through practice: Developing appropriate research strategies. No Guru, No Method, 82–95.Google Scholar
  18. Gray, C., & Malins, J. (2004). Visualizing research: A guide to the research process in art and design. Aldersho: Ashgate.Google Scholar
  19. Gray, C., & Pirie, I. (1995). ‘Artistic’ Research Procedure: research at the edge of chaos? Retrieved from http://design.osu.edu/carlson/id785/ead.pdf.
  20. Guba, E. G. (1990). The paradigm dialog. Newbury Park: Sage.Google Scholar
  21. Hall, D., & Ames, R. T. (1998). Daoist philosophy. In E. Craig (Ed.), Routledge encyclopedia of philosophy. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  22. Haseman, B. (2006). A manifesto for performative research. Media International Australia Incorporating Culture and Policy, theme issue “Practice-led Research” (118), 98–106.Google Scholar
  23. Jefferies, J. (2010). The artist as researcher in a computer mediated culture. In H. Gardiner & C. Gere (Eds.), Art practice in a digital culture. Burlington, VT: Ashgate Publishing LTD.Google Scholar
  24. Lang, A. (2008). Aesthetics in information visualization. Trends in information visualization: Hauptseminar Medieninformatik WS 2008/2009. Retrieved from http://141.84.8.93/pubdb/publications/pub/baur2010infovisHS/baur2010infovisHS.pdf#page=16.
  25. Marshall, C. (2010). A research design for studio-based research in art. Teaching Artist Journal, 8(2), 77–87.  https://doi.org/10.1080/15411791003618597.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. McKernan, J. (1991). Curriculum action research: A handbook of methods and resources for the refelctive practitioner. New York, NY: St. Martin’s Press.Google Scholar
  27. Mignonneau, L., & Sommerer, C. (2006). From the poesy of programming to research as art form. In P. Fishwick (Ed.), Aesthetic computing. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  28. Mondrian, P. (1942–43). Broadway Boogie Woogie [Painting]. Museum of Modern Art, New York.Google Scholar
  29. Nachmias, C., & Nachmias, D. (2000). Research methods in the social sciences. New York, NY: Worth Publishers.Google Scholar
  30. Norman, D. (2004). Emotional design: Why we love (hate) everyday things. New York, NY: Basic Books.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Oxford Dictionaries. (n.d.). Exegesis. Retrieved from http://www.oxforddictionaries.com/definition/english/exegesis.
  32. Paul, C. (2003). Digital art. London: Thames & Hudson.Google Scholar
  33. Pereyra, V., & Rial, J. A. (1990). Visualizing wave phenomenae with seismic rays. In G. M. Nielson, B. Shriver & L. J. Rosenblum (Eds.), Visualization in scientific computing. Los Alamitos, California: IEEE Computer Society Press.Google Scholar
  34. Ramos, E. (2012). Processing. In Arduino and Kinect projects (pp. 35–60). Apress, Berkeley, CA.Google Scholar
  35. Reas, C., & Fry, B. (2006). Processing code: programming within the context of visual art and design. In P. Fishwick (Ed.), Aesthetic computing. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  36. Schenk, P. (1991a). The changing role of drawing with specific reference to the graphic design process. In Proceedings of the DATER 1991 Conference. Loughborough: Loughborough University.Google Scholar
  37. Schenk, P. (1991b). The role of drawing in the graphic design process. Design Studies, 12(3), 168–181.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Schön, D. A. (1983). The reflective practitioner: How professionals think in action. New York, NY: Basic Books.Google Scholar
  39. Scrivener, S. (2000). Reflection in and on action and practice in creative-production doctoral projects in art and design (Working Papers in Art and Design, Volume 1). Retrieved from https://www.herts.ac.uk/__data/assets/pdf_file/0014/12281/WPIAAD_vol1_scrivener.pdf.
  40. Shien, G.-M. (1953). The epistemology of buddhism, taoism and confucianism. Philosophy, 28(106), 260–264.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Sullivan, G. (2009). Making space: The purpose and place of practice-led research. Retrieved from http://artpracticeasresearch.com/wp-content/uploads/Sull_Making_Space_Practice_Led_2009.pdf.
  42. Swift, B. (2006). Preparing numerical data. In R. Sapsford & V. Jupp (Eds.), Data collection and analysis (pp. 153–183). London: Sage Publications in association with the Open University.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Shanghai Jiao Tong University Press 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Shanghai University of Engineering ScienceShanghaiChina

Personalised recommendations