Advertisement

Study of Three-Way Solution for Node Movement in Mobile Ad Hoc Networks (MANETS)

  • Severin Gbetondji MichoaganEmail author
  • S. M. Mali
  • Sharad Gore
Conference paper
  • 29 Downloads
Part of the Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing book series (AISC, volume 1162)

Abstract

Mobile ad hoc network (MANET) is a subset of computer wireless networks and in its simplest form is the collection of mobile stations connected with each other by radio links to form a network. MANET is a self-configured, self-organized network where the movement of the mobile stations is random during the network. The positions of the nodes are unpredictable and have direct impact over network efficiency and its performance. For MANET network monitoring, we need to trace the motion of the node, and for controlling, we need to decide the optimal node movement. The focus for this paper is the study of three-way solutions of modeling node movement in MANET such as movement via trajectories, facilities for random mobility, and movement via programming interface. This study is followed by routing protocols performance analysis. Three routing protocols DSR, AODV, and OLSR are compared with segment-based trajectory as node movement model. OPNET is the simulation tool use, and the performances of the three routing protocols are analyzed based on the network metrics: throughput, end-to-end delay, and network load. The comparison analysis will be carried out, and at last, the conclusion will be presented.

Keywords

MANET Multihop Topology DSR OLSR AODV QOS OPNET 

References

  1. 1.
    Kumar, S., Basavaraju, T.G., Puttamadappa, C.: Ad hoc Mobile Wireless Networks, Principle, Protocols, and Application. Aeubach Publications, Taylor & Francis Group (2008)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Johnson, D.B., Maltz, D.A., Broch, J.: DSR: The dynamic source routing protocol for multi-hop wireless adhoc networks. Computer Science Department, Carnegie Mellon University Pittsburgh, PA, 15213–3891 (March, 2001). http://www.monarch.cs.cmu.edu/
  3. 3.
    Zadina, A., Fevensa, T., Bdirib, T.: Impact of varying node velocity and HELLO interval duration on position-based stable routing in mobile ad hoc networks. In: The 11th International Conference on Future Networks and Communications (FNC 2016)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Basagni, S., Conti, M., Giordana, S., Stoymenovic, I.: Mob. Ad hoc Netw. (2004)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Tanenbaum, A.S.: Computer Networks, 4th Edn. Prentice-Hall, Inc (2003)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Camp, T., et al.: A survey of mobility models for ad hoc network research. WCMC 2(5) (2002)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Ahuja, A., et al.: Performance of TCP over different routing protocols in mobile ad-hoc networks. In: Proceedings of the IEEE Vehicular Technology Conference (VTC 2000), Tokyo, Japan (2000)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Anastasi, G., Borgia, E., Conti, M., Gregori, E.: IEEE 802.11 ad hoc networks: performance measurements. In: Proceedings of the Workshop on Mobile and Wireless Networks (MWN 2003), Providence, Rhode Island (2003)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Lu, Z., Yang, H.: Unlocking the Power of OPNET Modeler. Cambridge University Press (2012)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Sanzgiri, K., Dahill, B., Levine, B.N., Shields, C., Belding-Royer, E.M.: A secure routing protocol for ad hoc networks. In: Proceedings of the 10th IEEE International Conference on Network Protocols (ICNP), Paris (2002)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Papastergiou, G., et al.: Deep-space transport protocol: a novel transport scheme for space DTNs. Comput. Commun. (COMCOM). Elsevier Science (2009)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Camp, T., et al.: A survey of mobility models for ad hoc network research. In: Wireless Communication and Mobile Computing (Special Issue on Mobile Ad Hoc Networking: Research, Trends and Applications) vol. 2, pp. 483–502 (2002)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Spyropoulos, T., et al.: An analytical study of fundamental mobility properties for encounter-based protocols. IJAACS (2008)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Wang, K., H., Li, B.: Group mobility and partition prediction in wireless ad-hoc networks. In: IEEE International Conference on Communications (ICC 2002) vol. 2, pp. 1017–1021. IEEE (2002)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Stojmenovic, I.: Position Based Routing in Ad hoc Mobile Networks. IEEE Commun. Mag. 40(7), 128–134 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Roy, R.R.: Handbook of Mobile Ad Hoc Networks for Mobility Models. Springer Science + Business Media, LLC (2011)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Bettstetter, C., Hartenstein, H., Perez-Costa, X.: Stochastic properties of the random waypoint mobility model: epoch length, direction distribution and cell-change rate. In: Proceedings of the 5th ACM International Workshop, MSWIM2002 (2002)Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Sanchez, M., Manzoni, P.: Anejos: a java based simulator for ad-hoc networks. Future Gener. Comput Syst 17(5), 573–583 (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
  20. 20.
    Bettstetter, C. et al. The node distribution of the random waypoint mobility model for wireless ad hoc networks. IEEE Trans. Mob. Comput. (2003)Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Timcenko, V., Stojanovic, M., Rakas, S.B.: MANET routing protocols vs. mobility models: performance analysis and comparison. In: Proceedings of the 9th WSEAS International Conference on Applied Informatics and Communications (AIC ‘09)Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Perkins, C., Royer, E.: Ad-Hoc on-demand distance vector routing. In: Proceedings of the Second IEEE Workshop on Mobile Computing Systems and Applications, WMCSA’99, pp. 90–100 (February, 1999)Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Clausen, T., Jacquet, P., Laouiti, A., Muhlethaler, P., Qayyum, A., Viennot, L.: Optimized link state routing protocol. In: Proceedings of IEEE INMIC, Lahore, Pakistan (2001)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2021

Authors and Affiliations

  • Severin Gbetondji Michoagan
    • 1
    Email author
  • S. M. Mali
    • 1
    • 2
  • Sharad Gore
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Computer ScienceSavitribai Phule Pune UniversityPuneIndia
  2. 2.Dr. Vishwanath Karad, MIT World Peace UniversityPuneIndia

Personalised recommendations